[FISKING] Siddiqui on Ontario and sharia
Jun. 15th, 2004 04:32 amThis is the first fisking of an article this year. So far as I remember, my last fisking of an article was done in March 2003. Still, when I read Haroon Siddiqui's article "Global issues, agendas colour sharia debate", published in the Sunday, June 13th edition of the Toronto Star, page F1 in the print edition, I felt that I just had to do it.
* * *
For starters, it's interesting to note how Siddiqui begins by defining the debate as "emotional." In Siddiqui's reading of the debate, emotion isn't merely a background feature of the debate, nor is it one foreground feature among many. No, the debate itself is "emotional," raising the question in Siddiqui's readers' minds of whether or not emotion is overriding the good judgement of one side or the other. And guess which side of the debate is excessively emotional?
( Time for some fun. )
I know that Siddiqui's arguing a particular point. It would just be nice if he'd concede that his opponents aren't either anti-Muslim bigots or weak-minded Muslims. Intellectual honesty is always nice in commentators.
( Counter )
"Nobody thinks the extreme sections of sharia will be carried out. But still, if Canada accepts this, it means it will give credibility to the sharia law around the world."
That admission by Sheila Ayala of the Humanist Association of Canada shows how the emotional debate on the proposed religious arbitration for Muslims is not about Ontario alone.
For starters, it's interesting to note how Siddiqui begins by defining the debate as "emotional." In Siddiqui's reading of the debate, emotion isn't merely a background feature of the debate, nor is it one foreground feature among many. No, the debate itself is "emotional," raising the question in Siddiqui's readers' minds of whether or not emotion is overriding the good judgement of one side or the other. And guess which side of the debate is excessively emotional?
( Time for some fun. )
I know that Siddiqui's arguing a particular point. It would just be nice if he'd concede that his opponents aren't either anti-Muslim bigots or weak-minded Muslims. Intellectual honesty is always nice in commentators.
( Counter )