Mar. 30th, 2005

rfmcdonald: (Default)
There are, on Yonge Street between College and Bloor streets, several used book stores. One used bookstore, on the west side of Yonge and north of Wellesley, is dirtier than the rest, with battered books lying on cheap bookshelves and in slightly grimy white plywood-lined bins by the street. I wasn't even going into the store, I was just passing by on the street when I saw, lying in one of those bins, Abraham Shumsky's 1955 The Clash of Cultures in Israel: A Problem for Education (Teachers College, Columbia University: 1955) available for only one dollar.

One of the most notable facts about Israel is the sheer scael of Jewish immigration to Israel (aliya), via the Jewish Agency for Israel and through other ways and for reasons not directly related to Zionism. The scale of the immigration led to very rapid population growth, with an almost tenfold multiplication since the end of the country's population since the 1948 war of independence. Naturally, the scale of this immigration created significant tensions between the different population segments, and in the years immediately following Israeli independence the conflict between Ashkenazim and Oriental Jews--between European and non-European Jews, briefly put--was central. In many ways, it still is central, with the massive growth of a Jewish community originating from the former Soviet Union and the increasing assertiveness of the Israeli Arab community simply overshadowing a cotninued conflict.

Shumsky's text is a fascinating piece of period sociology, dating from a time when everyone agreed that social engineering was a good thing and relating to a country where the conscious construction of nationality is an ongoing goal. Shumsky focuses upon education as the tool for integrating Jews of Oriental background into an Israeli polity and society defined by Ashkenazim-founded structures and norms. He notes the collapse of Oriental Jewish communal institutions and the alienation experienced by children relative to their more conservative parents, and worries about the possibility of the creation of a permanent Oriental underlcass. His final conclusions--that teachers become aware of inter-ethnic issues in schools, and try to sensitize their students to these issues and to the positive benefits of Jewish ethnic diversity--come across as insufficient to the task at hand, at least to an early 21st century reader still aware of continued disparities. He was aware of the intractability of this division, though. Shumsky was simply concerned with creating hope.

The Clash of Cultures in Israel is a fascinating period analysis of a fascinating subject.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Marta Dolecki's article "Que signifie, aujourd’hui, être francophone en Ontario?" in L'Express, Toronto's free French weekly, is an interesting meditation on the mutations of la francophonie in Ontario after its entry to the 21st century.

À ce propos, quel est l'avenir de la francophonie en Ontario? Qu'en est-il de la vie quotidienne dans une province où les francophones ne représentent seulement que 5% de la population totale? Et puis d'abord, que signifie, aujourd'hui, être francophone en Ontario? Est-ce d'abord être Franco-Ontarien, Ontarien, Canadien-français? Ce terme est-il toujours porteur, comme autrefois, d'une identité forte et distincte?


Her interviews with four Ontario Francophones are interesting, with her dialogue with Guinea-born Niguepa Camara being a particular must-read. Ontario's Francophone community is still the largest Francophone community in Canada outside of Québec, and like Québec French Ontario is a community affected by mass immigration. Whether French Ontario will be as effective in incorporating these immigrants into itself as Québec is a question for the future, though L'Express' equivocal portrait in this and past issues at least suggests that something positive is happening.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Reading my free copy of Metro Toronto on the subway this morning, and not being a viewer of The West Wing, I was shocked to discover that aforementioned television show--supposedly about, by, and for policy wonks--identified Turkey as an Islamic republic that executed women for the crime of adultery. Journal of Turkish Weekly covers NBC's apology:

Television network NBC President Jeff Zucker apologized by letter to Turkey's Ambassador to Washington, Frank Logoglu, after broadcasting an inaccurate portrayal of Turkey in a recent episode of the show "West Wing".

The show portrayed Turkey to be a country ruled by Islamic law that had ordered the beheading of a woman for the crime of adultery.

Both Zucker and the executive producer of the show, John Well's, offered their apologies for the unflattering portrayal and worte that they had been misinformed about Turkey and its laws.

"In the future we will not only visit Turkey, a country that we admire, but also present a better and correct portrayal of your country." Zucker and Wells said in an attempt to correct the defamation.


I'm still surprised that apparently the writers never heard of Ataturk. No, Muslims are not all alike. [livejournal.com profile] optimussven can go into much more detail than me.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
This morning on CBC Radio's The Current, there was a disturbing documentary about the spread of HIV/AIDS in Canada's First Nations. Canadian aboriginals make up perhaps 3% of the national population, but according to some alarming estimates account for up to a quarter of new HIV infections. The situation is dire; and unsurprisingly, there is no money to do anything. So, impending catastrophe ahead.

Yesterday I finished rereading Randy Shilts' 1987 And The Band Played On, returning my borrowed library copy at the Toronto Reference Library. Shilts' magisterial (if controversial) survey of the early HIV/AIDS epidemic in the United States left with me with the distinct impression, this time just as on the other occasions I've read the book, that worst-case scenarios with HIV/AIDS have a funny way of coming true.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
[livejournal.com profile] alecsebastien links to selected quotes from Jefferson, Adams, and Madison. I'm surprised at how anti-clerical they tended to be.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Now that the veil of secrecy has been lifted, might I congratulate the charming couple of [livejournal.com profile] serod and [livejournal.com profile] runyon on their upcoming nuptials?
Page generated Apr. 14th, 2026 08:28 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios