Aug. 5th, 2005

rfmcdonald: (Default)
I turned up early for my weekly session of RPGing and I was hungry, so I decided to dine at Vesta Lunch (474 Dupont Street). [livejournal.com profile] bitterlawngnome and [livejournal.com profile] danthered had pointed out this traditional diner several months ago en route to Stouffville, and I was always curious about diner culture, the Island's sole examples seemingly having disappeared by the time I became an adult.

Inside, I was pleased to see that it looked the part, all chrome countertops and swiveel stools and fogged-over display cases. I ordered a deluxe hamburger, including coleslaw and fries. The hamburger was decent enough, grilled and put on a nuked bun with toppings, but there was no vinegar for Upper Canadian-style fries. As I chewed, I looked around at the decor. Alongside the Greek-language tourist posters put up by the owner, I saw magazine covers, photocopies and others, pasted on the walls: A Toronto Life cover from 1999, a Saturday Star picture of a Chinese ballerina leaping in front of the window from 2000, the front page of a National Post Toronto section from 2001, others. Curiously, many of these pictures were taken at night, likely in conscious recall of Edward Hopper's 1942 painting Nighthawks.



I recommend Vesta Lunch for what it is, a good diner with plenty of atmosphere, something that has progressed beyond a contemporary reality to an active cultural artifact. And yes, the food's good, too.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Walking home this early morning, I realized that the last time I was on this stretch of Bloor was back in April 2003, when I had dinner with a friend at the excellent Frommer's-recommended Ethiopian restaurant Lalibela (869 Bloor Street West). I noticed at the time that this neighbourhood, bordering upon the Korean Business Area, was heavily Ethiopian and Eritrean, with plenty of signs in Amharic script. I hadn't noticed the sizable Greek cluster midway on my walk, and as I walked at half past one I wondered if there was any connection to the sizable Greek--especially Greek-Cypriot--mercantile diaspora in central and eastern Africa. Likely not, but still I wonder.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Via Crooked Timber, Cosma Shirazi's essay on the ills of creationism and intelligent design deserves broader quoting.

The thing is, this leads to bad science, and, if an unbeliever can say so, bad religion. The stakes are more serious here than with silly “devotionals with mathematical content”, but the issues are not that different. Doing what you must know is shoddy science, in the hope that it will provide cover for propagating the gospel, shows a poor opinion of your fellow creatures, of the gospel, and of God. Of your fellow creatures, because you are resorting to trickery, rather than honest persuasion or the example of your own life, to win converts. Of the gospel, because you do not trust its ability to change lives and win souls. Last and worst, of God, because you are perverting what you believe to be the divine gift of intelligence, and refusing to learn about the Creator from the creation. And for what? To protect your opinion about what measure you think it fitting for God to employ.

One of the greatest passages in the Bible is when "the Lord answered Job out of the whirlwind":

Where was thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding. Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it? Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof; when the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy?


Creationism is a way of responding to this profound challenge by saying "I know! I know! You did it
just like I woulda!"
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Though I am a fan of coffee in all its forms, is it morally permissible for me to drink Nescafé instant coffee for want of proper coffee-making facilities?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Bruno Coppens' article at La Libre Belgique, "Vive le rattachisme!", posted early this June, on rattachisme, deserves to be read if only for its innovative response to French problems.

Je vous le dis, le rattachisme n'est pas loin! Alors aidons notre voisin en difficulté (3 millions de chômeurs, Giscard toujours en activité, Navarro à la retraite, Francis Lalanne en tournée,...)! Et même si la langue demeure une barrière, on saura pouvoir faire avec! Prenons la France sous notre aile, ne fût-ce que pour voir la tête que tireront les Flamands se retrouvant soudain face à un partenaire représentant non plus 4 millions et demi de francophones mais près de 65 millions d'habitants! Ah ah! Je jubile déjà! Imaginez, le nouveau rapport de force...


As Coppens points out, picking the capital of the Belgian kingdom's new "Communauté Wallonie-Bruxelles-France-Corse" will of course be a problem--will it be Namur, Mons, Rochefort? Despite this difficulty, Coppens deserves commendation for his creative thinking. Forget Greater France, or Greater America. Be innovative and try Greater Wallonia and Greater Canada!
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Tuesday evening, I was wandering with [livejournal.com profile] raphinou through Toronto's Chinatown on Spadina, looking for chinoiserie. In one store, I came across a world globe inlaid with what looked to be semi-precious stones, available for almost four hundred dollars Canadian. As I looked at it, for a moment I thought that the globe's makers had given Korea a good-sized chunk of northeastern China. It was just the angle of the light.

That said, Korea might well have acquired that territory north across the Yalu. 20th century Korea has always been a more porous society than contemporary Japan; of the 75 million Koreans now alive, almost five million live outside the peninsula. China, particularly in its northeastern regions, is home to two million ethnic Koreans, ranking alongside the United States as a centre for this diaspora. The Korean community implanted along the North Korean frontier is ancient, with the ancient Koguryo kingdom basing itself partly in this region and modern immigration to what was then the underpopulated Manchu homeland beginning in the 16th century. Korean immigration kicked up in the late 19th century, owing to poverty in Korea and the onset of Japanese colonialism. Japan tried, and failed, to make the Koreans in Manchuria Japanese agents, while under the People's Republic of China Koreans managed to gain a certain amount of autonomy in the Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture and the Changbai Korean Autonomous County. The border area, referred to be some as a "Third Korea", has begun to receive significant attention from the outside world, especially South Korea. The Third Korea has become part of the complicated Chinese-South Korean relations relationship, marked by growing trade and tourism and cultural exchange and by migration issues (ethnic Koreans migrating to work in South Korea, North Korean refugees taking refugee among their co-ethnics).

One reason that China's quietly hostile to the idea of Korean reunification, apart from the prospect of having a pro-American state bordering some of its most important industrial areas, is the possibility that a unified Korea might lay claim to these areas. The idea of Korean irredentism isn't wholly without foundation. Just after Korea was made a Japanese protectorate in 1905, Japan signed with China the Jian Dao/Gando Convention renouncing Korea's rights to much of this border region. Recent statements from the South Korean foreign ministry to the effect that this convention is without value produced the expected uproar in the People's Republic, complicated by a 1999 citizenship law that would have given ethnic Koreans near-equality with South Korean citizens, and perhaps also by South Korea's new cultural outreach programs. Expansionism isn't likely even after reunification, given China's strength and Korea's certain preoccupations with the North.

Over on soc.history.what-if, I wondered if it might have been possible for Korea to include at least some of these territories, if, perhaps, Japan might have demanded that China transfer historically Korean lands to Japan's Korean protectorate. That might have happened, but as a commenter pointed out China likely would have gotten these territories back from Korea after the Soviet invasion of Japan's mainland holdings in 1945 (assuming, of course, that the Pacific War follows on track). Any ethnic Koreans living in these lands would, judging by precedents elsewhere in Eurasia after the Second World War, be repatriated to their ethnic homeland, bringing the Third Korea to a premature end. This Korea is still likely to come to a premature end, owing to the demands of South Korea's immigrant-attracting economy and aging population.

The government will establish a training system to produce more qualified Korean-language teachers and develop both online and offline language study programs. More scholarship programs will be offered for ethnic Koreans interested in studying Korean language and culture, ministry officials said.

"The government is considering making it easier for ethnic Koreans, especially those in China, to come to Korea as the labor shortage is feared to weaken the nation’s competitiveness," a ministry official told The Korea Times.

"No detailed plan has been fixed yet, but the Presidential Committee on Aging and Future Society will be in charge of developing new programs after discussing it with related offices including the Ministry of Culture and Tourism, the Ministry of Education and Human Resources Development and the Overseas Koreans Foundation."

According to the ministry, some 2.14 million ethnic Koreans live in China, the second largest ethnic Koreans’ group in the world. The figure is slightly lower than 2.15 million in the U.S.

Japan placed third with some 630,000 ethnic Koreans, followed by Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States with some 550,000 people.

The National Statistical Office (NSO) said earlier this month that the number of Koreans able to participate in production activities will begin to decrease in 2016, considering the falling birth rate and the growing number of the elder population.


If ethnic Koreans in China are likely to be sucked up, so too are ethnic Koreans living in other relatively poorer countries. The Koryo Saram, the ethnic Koreans of Central Asia, transplanted by Stalin from the Far East, are also likely candidates. German N. Kim, an ethnic Korean from Kazakhstan, wrote last year for The Korea Times that the Koryo Saram were rooted in Kazakhstan, while Kim's quarter-million Uzbekistani counterparts were largely responsible for Daewoo's dubious investments in that country. Diaspora identities are always valid, but attractive homelands exert an inexorable pull. Look at how Germany's open door has absorbed almost the whole of the German diaspora left in central and eastern Europe after the Second World War, or how Estonia may yet attract the Eastern Estonian diaspora. The idea of a Third Korea, or a Greater Korea, seems destined to have been ephemeral in almost any plausible history akin to ours. It's perhaps a pity, but at least it had a lifespan at all.
Page generated Mar. 24th, 2026 07:36 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios