On the subjects of good old-fashioned family values and the strongly negative effects of tribalism on women, a while ago someone on my friends list linked to Maged Thabet Al-Kholiody's article "There must be violence against women", published in the Yemen Times. It's an interesting read.
Yemen is a country where tribalism has historically been strong, product of a geography that encouraged the country's fragmentation into small semi-sovereign political units, long more powerful on the ground than any state claiming sovereign power on the ground. The tribe--a social unit held together by claims that its membership shares common ancestry--may well have the potential to undermine the position of women who, if they were autonomous, might threaten these claims. The imposition of strict religious law certainly wouldn't help the matter.
It's perhaps for this reason that, as Carmen Niethammer documents in her 2005 World Bank paper for the World Bank "Gender and Development in Yemen: Women in the Public Sphere," women in Yemen lack access to education, health care, the political system, and the labour market to a degree virtually without precedents elsewhere in the Middle East. It might also explain how, as Amira Al-Husseini at Global Voices Online reported last May, a recent study that found that 70% of a sample of 191 Yemeni women suffered abuse at the hands of their husbands and fathers.
Relationships between fathers and daughters or sisters and brothers also provoke argument from human rights organizations, which propose the suggested solutions for all relationships. Personally, I don’t think fathers or brothers would undertake such behavior unless there was a reason for it.
Fathers are responsible for their daughters’ behavior, but human rights organizations deny this too. Brothers also should take action regarding their sisters’ behavior, especially if their parents are too old or dead. If a daughter or sister makes a mistake--especially a moral one--that negatively affects the entire family and its reputation, what’s the solution by such organizations?
According to them, women should complain to the courts about any type of violence against them. Likewise, should fathers and brothers complain to police if their daughters or sisters violate moral, Islamic or social norms?
Fathers should handle their daughters via any means that suits their mistake; thus, is it better to use violence to a certain limit or complain to the police? Shall such women then complain to the police against their fathers or brothers? It’s really amazing to hear this.
Yemen is a country where tribalism has historically been strong, product of a geography that encouraged the country's fragmentation into small semi-sovereign political units, long more powerful on the ground than any state claiming sovereign power on the ground. The tribe--a social unit held together by claims that its membership shares common ancestry--may well have the potential to undermine the position of women who, if they were autonomous, might threaten these claims. The imposition of strict religious law certainly wouldn't help the matter.
It's perhaps for this reason that, as Carmen Niethammer documents in her 2005 World Bank paper for the World Bank "Gender and Development in Yemen: Women in the Public Sphere," women in Yemen lack access to education, health care, the political system, and the labour market to a degree virtually without precedents elsewhere in the Middle East. It might also explain how, as Amira Al-Husseini at Global Voices Online reported last May, a recent study that found that 70% of a sample of 191 Yemeni women suffered abuse at the hands of their husbands and fathers.