Jul. 18th, 2009

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Forty years ago plus two days, Apollo 11's lunar module landed on the Mare Tranqillitatis and Neil started out on the historic first walk ever on the moon



Readers of my blog have probably noticed that I've tried to follow space-related news, as evidenced by tags like "space science", "space travel", and so on. I am excited by the fact that new space probes are being readied for launch to many different destinations, by established and new spacefaring powers, and the idea of suborbital flights as tourism appeals to me (the idea of suborbital spacecraft as the poor man's ICBM, not so much).

But manned space travel? Space colonization? What's the point, really? (Please please don't cite lunar helium-3.) Yes, active selenological research bases would be nice; yes, a terraformed Mars and clouds of O'Neill habitats at any number of LaGrange points would be fantastic; yes, a world like Tirane serenly and greenly orbiting Alpha Centauri A would be a great place to visit.

But will any of these things happen in my lifetime, or even start to happen? I doubt it. Projects too costly, too difficult to achieve with current technology, and with too little support from the general population aren't going to happen, at least not until human societies become wealthier and more technologically advanced and so convince potential objectors that the project's worth the expense. Why do you think that it took forty years after the Apollo missions before the world as a whole became interested putting people on the Moon? Cold War tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union drove the manned missions of the 1960s, and it's worth noting that the abortive Chinese manned space program using Shuguang vehicles was driven by the demons of the People's Republic in the early 1970s. As for the drama of space, well, David Bowie's Major Tom song cycle starts with a man who's a detached if noble hero and makes him into a junkie who's probably also closeted. The mythos of the noble astronaut is dead; space is just another place to live and work and die.

Before I die I can imagine different national bases on the Moon, then, I can easily imagine clouds of unmanned space probes scattered across the greater Solar System, I can even imagine at least one manned landing on Mars. Anything more than that? Silliness.

What do you think?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
In violation of my established protocols of doing only one text-content post and one or two media-content posts a weekend, I'll start this second [FORUM] post by reproducing this item from WIRED's Danger Room blog.

In response to rumors circulating the internet on sites such as FoxNews.com, FastCompany.com and CNET News about a “flesh eating” robot project, Cyclone Power Technologies Inc. (Pink Sheets:CYPW) and Robotic Technology Inc. (RTI) would like to set the record straight: This robot is strictly vegetarian.

On July 7, Cyclone announced that it had completed the first stage of development for a beta biomass engine system used to power RTI’s Energetically Autonomous Tactical Robot (EATR™), a Phase II SBIR project sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Defense Sciences Office. RTI’s EATR is an autonomous robotic platform able to perform long-range, long-endurance missions without the need for manual or conventional re-fueling.

RTI’s patent pending robotic system will be able to find, ingest and extract energy from biomass in the environment. Despite the far-reaching reports that this includes “human bodies,” the public can be assured that the engine Cyclone has developed to power the EATR runs on fuel no scarier than twigs, grass clippings and wood chips – small, plant-based items for which RTI’s robotic technology is designed to forage. Desecration of the dead is a war crime under Article 15 of the Geneva Conventions, and is certainly not something sanctioned by DARPA, Cyclone or RTI.

“We completely understand the public’s concern about futuristic robots feeding on the human population, but that is not our mission,” stated Harry Schoell, Cyclone’s CEO. “We are focused on demonstrating that our engines can create usable, green power from plentiful, renewable plant matter. The commercial applications alone for this earth-friendly energy solution are enormous.” (emphasis in the original)



Yes, they have said repeatedly that say that the robot's vegetarian. Do you really believe that it has to be vegetarian?

Technology as a whole is advancing so quickly that I don't see any reason why Baltar's seduction by a comely Cylon leading to the destruction of the Twelve Colonies couldn't develop parallels in the real world. Cloaking devices, ion drives for spacecraft, self-maintaining robots, remarkable biotechnologies, immensely powerful and swift computer networks, new theories describing the behaviour of humans as individuals and in groups ... we have the potential to map our world more completely than any preceding generation of humans, and do with it almost what we will.

And this prospect terrifies me. Most technologies don't spread uniformly across the world, each getting to different places at different times thanks to things like widely varying income levels and degrees of cultural receptivity and the simple ease of physical access, among many other variables. Do my readers think it likely that the advent and deployment of these technologies could help entrench existing global inequalities, leaving the developed world and perhaps the BRIC and other notable economies to dominate the rest of the planet, and different social clases within these victors to dominate others?

Thoughts?
Page generated Apr. 14th, 2026 12:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios