[REVIEW] Marie Antoinette
Nov. 1st, 2006 12:05 amUPDATE (12:05 AM, 1 November): Edited since I'd not recognized at the time just what a good bottle of Fuller's London Porter will do to my writing style. (Hi Andy!)
I bought a brioche from the Asian bakery in the mall where i work this morning. The brioche is, of course, famous as the subject of the infamous line falsely attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette of France, "qu'ils mangent du broiche," or "Let them eat cake." I didn't particularly like the brioche. Yes, it was pleasant to eat, but it lacked any particularly distinguishing taste.
The same can't be said of Sofia Coppola's film Marie Antoinette, which I caught on the weekend with J. Coppola, as a director, might be caught up on the theme of making films about young women trapped on the cusp of maturity in an unforgiving world, and certainly I got, in Coppola's film, a sense that the French royal court in the late 18th century was pretty much like high school in modern North America, the significant difference being that the nobles caught in the court were caught up in this for their entire lives.
The more that I watched the film, caught up in Kirsten Dunst's convincing portrayal of the desperate young woman of the title and Jason Schwartzman as her ineffectual but well-meaning husband Louis XVI, filmed with a rather nice supporting cast with skilled on Versailles' grounds and given extra force by a rather nice soundtrack composed of 1980s popular music that helped anchor the film in a contemporary mindset, the more that I liked it. It might not be good history sensu strictu but it is good enough. It's certainly a good film.
(See here for another, certainly more learned, opinion, courtesy of
charlemagne77.)
I bought a brioche from the Asian bakery in the mall where i work this morning. The brioche is, of course, famous as the subject of the infamous line falsely attributed to Queen Marie Antoinette of France, "qu'ils mangent du broiche," or "Let them eat cake." I didn't particularly like the brioche. Yes, it was pleasant to eat, but it lacked any particularly distinguishing taste.
The same can't be said of Sofia Coppola's film Marie Antoinette, which I caught on the weekend with J. Coppola, as a director, might be caught up on the theme of making films about young women trapped on the cusp of maturity in an unforgiving world, and certainly I got, in Coppola's film, a sense that the French royal court in the late 18th century was pretty much like high school in modern North America, the significant difference being that the nobles caught in the court were caught up in this for their entire lives.
The more that I watched the film, caught up in Kirsten Dunst's convincing portrayal of the desperate young woman of the title and Jason Schwartzman as her ineffectual but well-meaning husband Louis XVI, filmed with a rather nice supporting cast with skilled on Versailles' grounds and given extra force by a rather nice soundtrack composed of 1980s popular music that helped anchor the film in a contemporary mindset, the more that I liked it. It might not be good history sensu strictu but it is good enough. It's certainly a good film.
(See here for another, certainly more learned, opinion, courtesy of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)