Utopian Thoughts
Feb. 4th, 2004 06:59 pmI did a presentation today for my Renaissance cultural capital class, on the ways that education was used by 16th century Tudor statesmen (More, Cromwell, Bacon, Cecil, Smith in passing) to generate social capital for the Tudor monarchy's plan of empire, of a future-looking retroactive justification for England's separation, trying to tie it to More's Utopia. (I tried to tie it in to the Utopians' desire to socialize and enculturate their populations.) I choked on a question about Cromwell, and I thought it ruined the presentation, but apparently it went well. If nothing else, the question period went well--the Tudors' cultural engineering, engaged in both actively and passively, was a point I didn't touch upon in my main speech but which seemed quite important.
I was also able to connect More's internal debate about whether or not to take up a job with the Privy Council, at the time he wrote book 1, with the social ideals represented by the Utopians, by noting that the end of book 2. Here, he wrote that although he found many social elements implausible, there were many he felt Europe could benefit from adopting. More's New World society, though, was peopled by humans from an alternate reality, who were naturally moral and rational in their actions, and who did not need coercive state authority. More's reality required the state; and so, he joined up with the promising second Henry of the Tudor dynasty, intent on employing the coercive powers of the state to improve society.
I'll have to write the entire speech up in an essay for submission. It should work fairly well, I hope-it sounded plausible enough, at least, at the time.
After this, I've the LSAT Saturday, then a presentation on Locke and Sterne Wednesday. I'll need to check some essays over Reading Week, but that shouldn't be an issue. Job and apartment searching for Toronto will go on, though I don't think I'll be visiting as I'd expected.
I was also able to connect More's internal debate about whether or not to take up a job with the Privy Council, at the time he wrote book 1, with the social ideals represented by the Utopians, by noting that the end of book 2. Here, he wrote that although he found many social elements implausible, there were many he felt Europe could benefit from adopting. More's New World society, though, was peopled by humans from an alternate reality, who were naturally moral and rational in their actions, and who did not need coercive state authority. More's reality required the state; and so, he joined up with the promising second Henry of the Tudor dynasty, intent on employing the coercive powers of the state to improve society.
I'll have to write the entire speech up in an essay for submission. It should work fairly well, I hope-it sounded plausible enough, at least, at the time.
After this, I've the LSAT Saturday, then a presentation on Locke and Sterne Wednesday. I'll need to check some essays over Reading Week, but that shouldn't be an issue. Job and apartment searching for Toronto will go on, though I don't think I'll be visiting as I'd expected.