[BRIEF NOTE] Ethnocracy in Kirkuk
Feb. 22nd, 2006 01:51 pmOn Monday, Michael Totten made a subtly disturbing post. "Our Jerusalem" examines the city of Kirkuk in northern Iraq, located just south of the border between autonomous Iraqi Kurdistan and the rest of the country. Kirkuk had a Kurdish majority before Saddam's rule, and the Iraqi Kurds want it back. Saddam's demographic maneuverings, however, created a much larger Arab population, through immigration and the displacement of Kirkuk Kurds. Iraqi Kurdistan wants it back, reasonably enough. Unreasonably enough, they don't want all of its people.
Why am I reminded of those posters on soc.culture.baltics who, when asked how the newly independent Baltic States should deal with Soviet-era Baltic Russian immigrants, simply say that there are plenty of trains heading east to the Russian Federation? Not to worry, Totten assures us, the Kurds aren't engaging in vengeance, why they're trying to attract Arab Christians to Kirkuk: "They don’t care about race, and they don’t care about religion. They are concerned strictly with numbers and security. It's just that some groups are more trusted than others. Arab Christians will never join an Islamist jihad, as everyone knows. And the Kurds trust Arab Christians not to join the Baath either." As you might remember, Iraq's former foreign minister Tariq Aziz was not only a Christian but a member of the Baath party.
The Baltic States were sensible enough, after initial shocks, to deal with the Soviet-era immigrants as potential members of their society. Here's hoping Iraqi Kurdistan is smart enough to follow suit.
The trouble with taking the city honorably is that they first want to kick out the Arabs moved there by Saddam Hussein. They don’t want to evict all the Arabs. As I’ve mentioned before, Iraqi Kurds have no interest in creating an ethnic-identity state. They only want to reverse Saddam’s Arabization campaign and make the city safe and secure as Erbil, Suleimaniya, and Dohok already are. Those Arabs who lived there before, those who are actually from there, are welcome to stay.
The Kurdistan Regional Government wants to financially compensate those Arabs who are asked to leave. Simply reversing one unfair population transfer with another isn’t right, and the Kurds know it. They might not even care about this at all if Kirkuk weren’t a playground for terrorists. But it is a dangerous place and there are no easy answers. The aftershocks of Saddam’s divide-and-rule strategy are still explosive.
Why am I reminded of those posters on soc.culture.baltics who, when asked how the newly independent Baltic States should deal with Soviet-era Baltic Russian immigrants, simply say that there are plenty of trains heading east to the Russian Federation? Not to worry, Totten assures us, the Kurds aren't engaging in vengeance, why they're trying to attract Arab Christians to Kirkuk: "They don’t care about race, and they don’t care about religion. They are concerned strictly with numbers and security. It's just that some groups are more trusted than others. Arab Christians will never join an Islamist jihad, as everyone knows. And the Kurds trust Arab Christians not to join the Baath either." As you might remember, Iraq's former foreign minister Tariq Aziz was not only a Christian but a member of the Baath party.
The Baltic States were sensible enough, after initial shocks, to deal with the Soviet-era immigrants as potential members of their society. Here's hoping Iraqi Kurdistan is smart enough to follow suit.