May. 6th, 2009

rfmcdonald: (Default)
I may well be excessively sensitive to be upset by the misspelling in this sign at the City of Toronto's Christie Pits park but it really grates. The team is called the Toronto Maple Leafs, hockey team and minor league baseball team both. Judging by context, there shouldn't even be an apostrophe here. Does the city lack anyone capable of proofreading a simple sign?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I was right when I predicted a firestorm over the European Union's seal ban.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper flew into a fight over the seal hunt Tuesday night, landing in Prague to launch free-trade negotiations with European leaders just as Canadian lawyers geared up for a legal challenge against an EU seal ban.

The European Parliament voted 550 to 49 for a trade ban on seal products only hours before Mr. Harper's Airbus touched down in Prague, sparking calls for tit-for-tat trade retaliation from angry sealers on Canada's East Coast.

In Prague, Trade Minister Stockwell Day said the ban and the “exciting” prospect of a free-trade deal with the EU are “separate tracks” – but Newfoundland's government seethed that Mr. Harper will be abandoning the province if he does not demand the EU drop the ban before a pact is struck.

“Obviously the seal hunt and perhaps us as Newfoundlanders and Labradorians are not important,” said Fisheries Minister Tom Hedderson. “We joined this country in '49 and we became full Canadians. And we expect our Prime Minister to stand up for us.”

The ban must still be approved by the EU Council, comprised of ministers from the 27 member countries. But Tuesday's vote provided a clear signal that the ban is all but certain to go ahead, despite Canadian arguments that the seals are killed in a humane way. Mr. Day said that if the EU Council does approve the ban, Canada will launch a World Trade Organization challenge “within minutes.”

[. . .]

Trade lawyer Simon Potter, of McCarthy Tétrault, said the EU will have a hard time invoking the animal-protection or ethics clauses in existing trade rules, because the seal hunt doesn't harm its livestock or wildlife, and the EU has its own hunting and animal slaughters.

But that would likely take two or three years.

“By that time, the seal industry will be gone,” said Frank Pinhorn, managing director of the Canadian Sealers Association.


Good.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Conservative federal cabinet minister Vic Toers is outraged that parliamentarians suspect him incapable of implementing official bilingualism in the Treasury Board on account of the fact that he doesn't speak French.

Tory cabinet minister Vic Toews accused Liberals of insulting all unilingual anglophones Tuesday after two MPs questioned his ability to implement official languages policy without being able to speak French.

The flap erupted as the Treasury Board president was being questioned at a Commons committee about his responsibility for language policy in the federal public service.

“Do you speak French?” inquired Liberal MP Pablo Rodriguez. “Don't you think someone who has responsibility such as yours should be bilingual?”

Mr. Toews — who speaks English and Spanish as well as his first language, German — was incensed.

“I should feel free to be able to speak the official language of my choice and for you to even ask that question is an insult,” he raged.

But Jean-Claude D'Amours, another Liberal MP, pursued the matter.

“It seems to me that when we talk about official languages and bilingualism in Canada, you should be a bilingual person to better be able to serve the people,” Mr. D'Amours said. “For you that's an insult. I think it's an insult to me that you should be so bold as to make such a comment.”

Mr. Toews then accused the Liberals of suggesting unilingual Canadians are second-class citizens.

“For some reason, I'm less of a Canadian, I'm less entitled to hold public office because I only speak one of the official languages,” he fumed.


One thing that has never ceased to amused me is the fact that, although English Canadians commonly complain that Québec is discriminating against the English language and Anglophones, in actual fact Québec Francophones are far more likely to speak English than their English Canadian counterparts are to speak French: "Nearly 95% of Quebecers can speak French, but only 40.6% know how to speak English. In the rest of the country, 97.6% of the population is capable of speaking English, but only 7.5% know how to speak French. Because knowledge of English in Quebec is over five times higher, in percentage terms, than knowledge of French in the rest of the country, personal bilingualism is largely limited to Quebec itself, and to a strip of territory sometimes referred to as the “bilingual belt”, that stretches east from Quebec into northern New Brunswick and west into parts of Ottawa and northeastern Ontario. Thus, a majority of bilingual Canadians are themselves Quebeckers, and a high percentage of the bilingual population in the rest of Canada resides in close proximity to the Quebec border." This is the case even in the national capital of Ottawa, home to many Francophones and including as a sister city the QUébécois city of Gatineau on the other side of the Ottawa River. Many Americans I've talked to have been frankly surprised that more English Canadians they encounter can't speak French.

The ongoing assimilation of Francophone communities outside Québec, like the large Franco-Ontarian community, is something that I've blogged about before, and is a phenomenon that can be traced in part to the lack of French language fluency--indeed, sometimes to outright hostility towards the French language. It's worth noting that Québec's Anglophone community, despite some issues, is continuing to grow sharply even in the context of Québec's language laws. Any dream of a more symmetrical, balanced English-French bilingualism may as well be an alternate history.
Page generated Mar. 28th, 2026 12:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios