Scott James' New York Times article about San Francisco's famous hippie
Haight-Ashbury neighbourhood took me by surprise. Why?
[A]s World AIDS Day on Wednesday approaches, [Arthur] Evans wants to be sure that a chapter in local history is not forgotten: that Haight-Ashbury, now the Hippy Incorporated tourist destination, is remembered as a once-thriving, influential gay enclave.
“I called the Haight ‘the outer Castro,’ ” he said.
Mr. Evans, 68, a mannered dapper intellectual, is among perhaps only a handful of gay men who have continuously lived in the Haight since the 1970s. Gay men and lesbians were first attracted to the neighborhood during the sexual revolution of the 1960s. Later, the area’s “lost gay heyday” peaked from about 1975 to 1985, according to historians.
“Everyone knows that the Castro was decimated” by AIDS, Mr. Evans said.
“The same actually happened to gay men in the Haight,” he continued. “The Castro mostly recovered its gay population. The Haight did not.”
From his apartment overlooking the intersection of Haight and Ashbury Streets, Mr. Evans has had a unique front-row seat to the neighborhood’s evolution. When he arrived in 1974 (paying $180 a month in rent), he said, it was a decrepit, drug-infested slum; a few years later, the neighborhood was populated by as many as a dozen gay clubs, where Sylvester and other disco stars performed at haunts like the I-Beam.
The Haight had its own shade of gay, distinct from the political and commercial Castro — more embracing of a counterculture of artists and free spirits. “Many of the gay people in the Haight saw themselves as part of a larger community of bohemians,” said Don Romesburg, assistant professor of women’s and gender studies at Sonoma State University. “Gays were part of a broader mosaic.”
Then, what Mr. Evans called the “great wave of death” appeared in the early 1980s.
Paul Boneberg, executive director of the GLBT Historical Society, said, “Half the gay men in San Francisco were infected in the first wave” of AIDS, “and most died.”
I'd like to imagine myself at least somewhat knowledgeable of queer history and queer San Francisco, but I never heard of that Haight-Ashbury affectation. Certainly a
January 2009 travelogue from the same newspaper makes no mention of it. No one seems to have been left to publicize the queer past of Haight-Ashbury; at least, the few survivors don't seem to have been listened to, if they did speak.
HIV/AIDS is an epidemic that destroys neighbourhoods and communities so utterly that there may be little to no trace of them, only fragments from survivors. One reason the late Torontonian
Rick Bébout's online
Promiscuous Affections project--an online subjective history of Toronto's and Canada's queer community from the 1970s onwards--is such a valuable project is that it preserves much that would have been lost without Bébout and his effort to preserve things. Toronto's queer community fared lightly next to San Francisco's, mind, with infection rates--I recall--being less than half of those in that American city and a more tight-knit (since smaller) community, so much must have been preserved, but still ...
My various
History and Futility posts on information should make it clear what I think about collective memory and archiving. I love them both. The idea that an epidemic disease cold annihilate a community so completely--and the knowledge of just how horribly the community's members were annihilated, killed by a disease that no one had any reason to expect--horrifies me. And Toronto and the Haight-Ashbury were just two communities so lobotomized. Consider it just another reason to be horrified by the full flush of AIDS in the pre-protease inhibitor era, and another to be appalled by what's going in communities around the world not so privileged as others.