Via the Global Sociology Blog, via Boing Boing, over as Roscott, Inc. originally created by H. Caldwell Tanner and SystemComic.com:



Unlike Belgium, Luxembourg has been able to generate a fairly solid sense of national identity. This process was helped by the partitions of the formerly multi-lingual Grand Duchy, whose French-speaking areas were annexed by France and Belgium. The German-speaking rump-state sought to culturally differentiate itself from Germany by elevating its own local dialect to a national language after World War II. From a linguistic standpoint, Luxembourgish (Letzeburgesch, locally) is a French-influenced variant of a group of local Germanic dialects known as Moselle Franconian. The boundaries between Germanic dialects do not correspond with national boundaries anywhere in the greater Netherlands, as the 1890 German dialect map posted above shows. Local dialects, however, are in decline, gradually being replaced by national languages. Outside of Luxembourg, Moselle Franconian is yielding to standard German to the east and north and French to the south and west. Inside the country, it is thriving. Due both to its national status and to the fact that speakers of standard German cannot generally understand it, Luxembourgish is now classified as a language rather than a mere dialect.
Europe’s feudal remnants, incongruous bits of territory that escaped state-building aggregation, are often viewed as quaint anachronisms. But Luxembourg and Lichtenstein can also be viewed as highly important and utterly modern geo-political formations: small places that have leveraged their anomalous sovereignty into lucrative positions in the global financial system. Whether the roles that they have carved out for themselves serve the interests of the world at large is another question.
Years ago, I got to meet a few people who did the Paris – Dakar, and they were discussing the norms of the race. One such norm was that if you or someone from your team ran over some natives, you should NOT stop under any circumstances. Keep going, as these people might get brutal if you run over their kids. The bottom line was that the local population was either a hindrance (they force you to slow down and waste precious minutes to the finish line), or straight a hostile force to avoid, which was hard to do as the race got through populated areas.
One of the characteristics of the pleasure periphery is that norms are suspended for Westerners, whether we are talking about drug us or sex trafficking or any other kind of activities that are either frowned upon or downright illegal in Western countries.
In the example I gave above, race organizers actively encouraged a hit-and-run attitude. In exchange for the ability to transgress norms for one’s own pleasure, the host country gets money and does not ask too many questions.
Canada has no indigenously satellite launch capability and until the last decade it wasn't even an issue people within the industry contemplated too seriously. However global security events such as 9/11, arctic sovereignty, earth observation needs have all increased Canada's need and reliance on satellites. So does Canada need an indigenous satellite launch capability? It's a question worth exploring as we consider whether Canadian sovereignty is at risk by not having our own launch capability.
[. . .]
Every single country that has built their own launch capability always done it first and foremost for security needs. Russia, the United States, China, Japan, the European Union through France, India, and Israel all have the capability to launch a satellite into orbit while South Korea, North Korea, Iran and Brazil have launcher programs underway.
[. . .]
Any foreign country will put its interests ahead of what Canada wants. Case in point is the launching of a satellite that could be considered a threat to the national interests of the country who would be launching the satellite. If the foreign country determined that it could not be in its best interest to launch the satellite, it could just say no. And this in fact has already happened to Canada. Radarsat-2 was launched in December of 2007 after being delayed six years because Canada had to find another launch provider, ultimately the Russians, as the U.S. backed out of launching the satellite. This also forced Canada to find another satellite bus provider. These two changes proved to be costly as they added an additional $191.1 million to the total mission cost of $528.8 million.
[. . .]
With 10 launches pending in the next five years and more likely in the future it would seem there's an economic benefit to having these launches take place in Canada as well. After all, each satellite launch comes with a launch cost, which right now is spent in foreign countries. Those Canadian tax dollars could be spent at home which would also create new jobs and foster the growth of the domestic industry. An industry that would also benefit the scientific community. With more opportunities for space science, Canadian universities and research centres could be able to contribute more to our scientific knowledge base which in turn would help other related industries.
I mentioned a few days ago that the geek has become, in recent years, an uncommon figure of strength and legitimacy uncommon, so much so that a film like Kick-Ass has seen a surprising reversal: the super-hero is replaced by the geek. Other examples could be cited, but it is certain that geek culture has been widely disseminated. It is in Becker is rereading that I found a clue to help me understand where it comes from.
[. . .]
But where does this geek culture come from? What are its roots? I would like to advance a hypothesis from this classic of sociology that is Outsiders . In Chapter 5, Howard Becker studies "the culture of a deviant group", namely "dance musicians" in the 1950s and 1960s in the United States. Drawing on his own field experience - he himself was a jazz musician - he clearly identifies a particular culture, actually not that different in its operation from our own geek culture.In particular, these musicians made a clear distinction between them and the "squares" [. . .], namely those who are not musicians. How could you not see a parallel with how the geeks monitor carefully the boundaries of their group?
But what united this culture? Why did it develop? The dance musicians all faced common problems, and in returning to interact with them, they developed shared meanings. These problems have to do with the nature of their profession[.]
My hypothesis is that the geek culture finds its roots here. Originally, computing was an activity of enthusiasts, often gathered on American campuses, who were able to define their own criteria for good programs because they were interacting with each other. With the spread of computers, they have faced in business and elsewhere people who have other needs of computers, and different criteria of assessment criteria. They come into conflict with those computer scientists who derive a significant part of their identity around computer-generated graphics. This requires that they manage this conflict, and geek culture gives them that opportunity by drawing a space of independence for them. Thus, specialized knowledge in areas that some would regard as trivial, eg science fiction, Star Trek or another, all are means to express their exceptionality in relation to all-comers, this however imposing specific ways of working. [. . .]
The comparison between a group of artists, dance musicians, and computer workers should not be surprising. The independence of the artist, his creative abilities, his strong personality, his talent to take part in projects where he can bring in something new, in brief all the classical representation and some exaggerated activities are central principles of the functioning of contemporary capitalism[.] Therefore, it is not surprising that geek culture is spreading: it is deeply consistent with the "new spirit of capitalism." Hackers of all stripes maybe do not always realize how they are ultimately conformist.