![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rfmcdonaldSocial network pioneer Friendster, as we know it, will be gone on May 31. The company today announced to members that as part of its conversion from would-be Facebook competitor to "the social gaming destination of choice," it would be keeping accounts alive but deleting all user photos, comments, blog posts, and other profile content. Users interested in preserving that data are encouraged to use a tool to export their profiles to their hard drives.
It's another sad chapter for the company that could have become the social network that everyone used--basically, what Facebook is now. Or maybe it never could've been. For the past few years, after losing out first to MySpace and then Facebook in the U.S., Friendster has been focusing on the Southeast Asian markets where it's proven to have some lasting power. Late in 2009, it sold to MOL Global, a digital payments company based in Malaysia.
[. . .]
Friendster would miss its chance to be the first social network to "make it big" among mainstream users. But it was the first site that actually had a chance. The people who used Friendster were, for the most part, young adults looking to add a digital extension to their real-world social lives. They weren't necessarily the uber-geeks who populated early social sites like Tribe.net, nor were they the angsty teenagers typing out anonymized accounts of high school cafeteria drama. (Disclosure: I may or may not have been one of them circa 2000.) This was the first glimpse we had of the Internet as a place where everyone would be socializing online, where the physical and virtual were blurred.
But while Friendster became a sensation, it didn't get big enough. Its users hadn't lain down the roots that would keep them interested even when something newer and shiner came along. That's the hurdle that Facebook got over that MySpace didn't, and that Friendster before it didn't either--becoming such a routine part of so many peoples' lives that it no longer seems to require any effort. Of course you check your Facebook news feed. You're not about to forget about it.
Or maybe Friendster's mini-heyday in 2003 was still just too early. I knew plenty of people who created Facebook profiles as soon as the young social network was available at their colleges in 2004 because, given that it was restricted to people who shared their university affiliation, they were finally comfortable joining a social network. In the early 2000s, the idea of creating a profile on a social network was something unusual to most people--potentially dangerous, potentially creepy, and potentially an indicator that you didn't have enough going on in your real life and so were forced to turn to the Internet. Friendster was on the right track by encouraging members to only "friend" people they knew in real life. But just by offering a worldwide network of membership, it might have been too much too soon.
A much higher than average percentage of internet users in the Netherlands are using social networking sites like Twitter and LinkedIn. So much so that the country ranks number one worldwide in penetration for the two social networks.
LinkedIn and Twitter reach 26.1 percent and 26.8 percent respectively of the total internet-using population in the Netherlands.
Local social network Hyves sees even higher rates of usage in the country but may soon be eclipsed by Facebook, a site which has seen a 76 percent increase in local visitors in just one year.
[. . .]
Ninety-six percent of the online population (about 11.5 million people, out of a total population of about 16.67 million) in the Netherlands visited a social network in March, up 18 percent from last year's 9.7 million visitors.
Around 7.6 million people in the Netherlands visit Hyves each month while just under 6.6 million internet users in the Netherlands head to rival social network Facebook.
