[LINK] "Asteroid Miners Can Learn a Lot From Philae’s Bumpy Landing"

[rfmcdonald]

Wired's Sarah Zhang reports

When Rosetta’s probe, Philae, landed on a comet last November, it had the opposite problem of pretty much every other landing in human history: too little gravity. Rather than going kerplunk on impact, it bounced twice before finally coming to rest sideways—a harrowing landing a new Science paper describes in detail.

Landing on a jagged spinning comet with little gravity is absurdly hard, and it didn’t help that two out of three of Philae’s landing systems failed. But even this bumpy landing has importance for asteroid mining companies eager to excavate small bodies in space—potentially proving that their business is not as much like science fiction as it sounds.

The extremely low gravity of near earth asteroids is, after all, both a challenge and their primary advantage in space travel. Getting to space is expensive because of the massive amounts of fuel needed to escape Earth’s relatively mighty gravity. If asteroids can be mined for water, which can be broken down into hydrogen and oxygen for fuel, they could become depots for spaceships traveling into deep space—no return trip to Earth necessary to refuel, and a relatively inexpensive liftoff after the pit stop is over. “It’s not so much you are landing on the comet, as you are docking with it,” says Chris Lewicki, president and chief engineer of the asteroid mining company Planetary Resources.

Planetary Resources and its competitors such as Deep Space Industries are still developing equipment to scout for valuable asteroids. Actually mining one is far off. But the Rosetta mission proves that landing on a small body and getting back physical and chemical data to assess its mining value is very much possible—even when things don’t go perfectly. Today’s issue of Science includes seven papers from the Rosetta team, detailing everything from the comet’s rock structures to organic molecules.

The hardness of the comet surface will be a key piece of knowledge for future small body landings. Prior to landing, scientists didn’t know whether to expect a snow-like surface in which Philae might sink or a hard, icy one on which it might bounce. (Comets and asteroids are both small bodies, with asteroids generally rockier and comets icier. However, the line between the two has blurred with the discovery of bodies like Wilson–Harrington, a comet that lost its tail, turned black, and was then “rediscovered” as asteroids.) “We proved that bouncing is the major problem, though we didn’t want to do that,” says Philae landing manager Stephan Ulamec, alluding to the botched landing.

Much more there.