rfmcdonald: (Default)
[personal profile] rfmcdonald
Due to laptop troubles, [livejournal.com profile] pauldrye unfortunately couldn't make it to this week's meeting. Myself, James B., and [livejournal.com profile] schizmatic were all in attendance, shifting by 1:30 to Volo Caffè.


  • The first part of the meeting concerned largely non-uchronical matters, particularly concerning the decline of ideological hegemonies like Communism (in the Soviet Union) and radical Islam (in the Islamic Republic of Iran, perhaps soon enough to be followed by other states). Mass terror, as Ernest Gellner observes, doesn't contradict radically utopian ideologies since it makes instinctual sense to believe that great gains can come only after great sacrifices. Squalor, as in the Brezhnev-Andropov-Chernenko epoch in the Soviet Union, spoils great ideological hopes.

  • Following a discussion on the superiorities of Roman law to Chinese law (particularly in terms of property), there was a general debate on how to intensify contact between the Roman Empire and Han China. A Roman coquest of Persia was generally agreed to be one way, perhaps following a successful annexation of Germania and Bohemia, providing additional manpower; another was a Trajan who engaged in an earlier conquest of Dacia. The conquest wouldn't have to be permanent, which is good since retaining Persia for more than a few generations would be impossible. If it was enough to ensure Roman contact across central Asia, though, it might be enough. Other possibilities included a Roman conquest of Yemen and the establishment of contact not through Persia but through the plains of the North Caucasus and central Asia.

  • Returning to the topic of ideology decaying in squalor, there was another discussion about the consequences of a successful Soviet Third World War in Europe resulting in a conquest of West Germany specifically or of western Europe generally. Of course, thanks to Cold War-era disclosures we now know that Soviet war plans involved the use of tactical nuclear warheads from the start, and that the logic of deterrence would have quickly chained up to a full exchange of nuclear warheads between two sides that, directly and indirectly, would have killed most of the population of the Northern Hemisphere in a year's time. If, however, the nuclear-weapons usage could either be avoided altogether or could be stopped at a level short of the general decimation of western Europe, interesting things could result. Consider, for instance, how a West Germany with a GDP only slightly behind that of the entire Warsaw Pact would be dealt with, much less a western Europe taken as a whole. Most interestingly, consider how Soviet conscripts taken from the depths of Ukraine, provincial Russia, or Central Asia would react to a rich, liberal, and hedonistic West Germany (or western Europe). If you'd like to unite Europe from the Atlantic to the Urals using Soviet military force but eventually ending in West German dominance ...

  • Two visions from the previous situation: The Baader-Meinhof Gang, decide to kidnap not West German industrialists for their implementation of capitalism, but rather Soviet generals for implementing a false and oppressive Communism. David Bowie, in the Berlin of this setting records his trilogy of Low, Lodger, and Heroes. ("We can be heroes/just for one day.") I would really like to write a story around this.

  • Towards the end in a spare moment, I checked my E-mail via my cell phone and found this question by [livejournal.com profile] sharp_blue. [livejournal.com profile] schizmatic was of the opinion that Caesar's survival wouldn't alter things, since he himself was fairly committed to the Republic as an ideal and couldn't have overcome its legacy by himself.

Page generated Jan. 31st, 2026 04:14 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios