rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • The Burgh Diaspora's Jim Russell takes issue with an American conservative's criticism of an anti-fracking film as state propaganda for the United Arab Emirates. No, the oil/natural gas market doesn't work that way.

  • Crooked Timber's Corey Robin wonders why Matthew Yglesias sees state repression--state policies, more broadly--as key to the problems of independent unions in China but not so in the United States.

  • [livejournal.com profile] pauldrye's False Steps examines the abortive British effort in the late 1950s to build its own space launch vehicle.

  • GNXP's Razib Khan argues, in commenting on free speech laws outside of the United States, in that the repression of speech on grounds of potential harm to the community isn't done from a consistent philosophical position. Thoughts?

  • James Bow recounts his experience on the last trip of the Northlander train into northern Ontario. It does sound like it had a lot of potential for tourism and whatnot that went unexploited.

  • Robert Farley at Lawyers, Guns and Money shares links to commentary on China's launch of its first aircraft carrier, the Liaoning.

  • Maximos discusses Australia's seasonal, El Nino-dependent, Lake George.

  • Estonia as a Nordic nation, not that different from Sweden is the theme of the latest Itching for Eestimaa post.

  • Eugene Volokh notes rioting in Bangladesh inspired by a Facebook image of a desecrated Koran that led to attacks on that country's Buddhist minority.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
In the end, I'm almost ashamed to say, it was the presence of former Mr. Governor-General and prominent public philosopher John Ralston Saul as MC for Beyond Exile that made me decide to attend, Friday night at 7 o'clock. Co-hosted by PEN Canada and the Toronto Public Library as part of their Freedom to Read Week, Beyond Exile was presented on a posters as a night when three (named) Canadian journalists would interview three (unnamed) writers who'd received refuge in Canada. This is a noble cause, but I have to say that it was Saul's presence that's a clincher.

The evening was a busy night, Saul introducing the event, pointedly mentioning the empty chair that was left for Akbar Ganji, an Iranian journalist imprisoned by the Islamic Republic since 2000 before going on to introduce the pairings. First up was Toronto print journalist Haroon Siddiqui, who interviewed Ameera Javeria, a Peshawar-based journalist who with her husband contributed to Pakistan's The Frontier Post and The Friday Times until the publication of an allegedly blasphemous letter in the first newspaper and her relentless exposure of Pakistani honour killings resulted in death threats against her. CBC veteran Christopher Waddell followed with Sheng Xue from China, a writer of poetry and prose who fled China after the 1989 Tiannamen massacre and later became an activist of the Chinese overseas democracy movement. Last was Jian Ghomeshi, who interviewed Iran's fiction and drama writer Reza Baraheni.

The condition of being an exilic writer, installed in a foreign environment far from a dangerous homeland, was explored in these conversations. Of the three interviewees, English-speaking Javeria was best off, feeling at home in a sort of secular, left-wing and academic environment. Sheng Xue, for her part, suffered so severely from culture shock on arriving that it was only after her father's death in 1994 that she could start to write again. Fear, for their lives, their families and friends, and their countries' future was something that all three felt. Baraheni stood out for his remarkable good humour, first demonstrated when Ghomeshi asked him to respond to news reports that Iran was now the country most hated by polled Americans. Each writer read aloud a sample of their work for five minutes or so, Javeria reading the introduction to her unpublished book on honour killings, Sheng her prose elegy to her father, and Baraheni a sample of a dramatic monologue along with an English-language poem.

As I left at 9:30, clutching my Starbucks gift bag including a most excellent autographed copy of PEN Canada's travel anthology Writing Away, I worried. Sheng talked about the intensification of the Chinese government's control over Chinese society, Javaria of the rise of violent religious bigotry in her Pakistan, Baraheni more obliquely about his hopes that there wouldn't be a war over Iran, Ganji of course didn't talk at all. I take full advantage of my rights to freely express myself--in writing, in conversation--and the three writers interviewed do the same in Canada, but our counterparts in those three countries with more than one and a half billion people can't do the same. I know that good things can't come of this, and I think that I will commit myself to PEN Canada somehow. Without sounding trite, I just had the sinking feeling that it may not be enough.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Right here, the first hyperlink added by me.

Moscow has now canceled its Gay Pride parade. It was canceled after the chief Muslim leader in Russia warned that marchers would be "bashed" if they dared to walk the streets. Money quote:

"Earlier this week Chief Mufti Talgat Tadzhuddin warned that Russia's Muslims would stage violent protests if the march went ahead. "If they come out on to the streets anyway they should be flogged. Any normal person would do that - Muslims and Orthodox Christians alike ... [The protests] might be even more intense than protests abroad against those controversial cartoons." The cleric said the Koran taught that homosexuals should be killed because their lifestyle spells the extinction of the human race and said that gays had no human rights."


Notice this is not al Qaeda. It is the official mainstream Muslim leadership. Bob Wright today makes the case for self-censorship to avoid offense to religious groups and others. In principle, this makes sense. Gratuitous, arbitrary offense of someone else's faith is not a laudable exercize of free speech. It's an abuse of such freedom. But context is vital. Bob cites an example of portraying Jesus with a crown of thorns made up of dynamite sticks, after an abortion clinic bombing. I'd say that's a perfectly legitimate comment after an act of violence performed in the name of a religious figure who preached non-violence. Many Christians would share the sentiments of the cartoonist. It's ironic, as the Muhammad cartoon was. And if it's defensible in that case, it is exponentially more so in the case of Islam in 2006.

The world has been terrorized for decades now by murderers who specifically cite Muhammad as their inspiration. It is completely legitimate speech to point that out. Not to point it out - to remain silent in the face of it - is an act of denial.The reason that so many Muslims are offended is not just because any depiction of Muhammad is taboo; but because the conflation of Islam and murder is now firmly fixed in the global consciousness. I can understand why the repetition of that fact should upset many peace-loving Muslims. But that is not the fault of cartoonists. It's the fault of the Muslim terrorists, and the failure of mainstream Muslims to condemn them sufficiently, ostracize them completely, and prevent them effectively from further mayhem. At this point, in my judgment, further appeasement of these religious terrorists is counter-productive - and actually enables the extremists in their simultaneous intimidation of moderate Muslims.

To take another example: Would Bob urge the gay marchers in Moscow not to parade, because it offends so many religious people, Orthodox and Muslim? Should gay people censor themselves to avoid offending others? Should women who object to the brutal subjugation of half the human race in many Islamic societies silence themselves? Maybe Bob would indeed argue for self-censorship in these cases. Maybe he wouldn't. After all, Islam is very clear about the fate of homosexuals and the role of women. But self-censorship is a slippery slope. Practising it after acts of mass murder runs a real risk of inviting more of them. As ACT-UP used to say, "Silence = Death." Which is why the Islamists want as much silence as possible.
rfmcdonald: (Default)


Visit and view, if you dare.

UPDATE (4:35 PM) : HTML corrected.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
My first alma mater, rather.

At the University of Prince Edward Island, a student newspaper became one of the first Canadian papers to reprint the incendiary editorial cartoons when it published them in its Wednesday edition.

The drawings were included in 2,000 copies of the UPEI Cadre that were distributed on campus. University administration promptly ordered the papers taken off the stands, however.

Ray Keating, the editor-in-chief of the campus newspaper, defended his decision to print the cartoons. He said they were published along with commentary to provide the information people require to make an informed decision.

"We decided that prefaced with our comments, showing the cartoons for what they are was the only way to allow people to have their own opinion on the matter (of) whether they're offensive or not," Keating told CTV Newsnet.

"So many people seemed to be ready to condemn the cartoons and say it was a terrible thing based on the events that were happening in Syria. But most of the people, if not all of the people we spoke to had never seen the cartoons."

The university's administration took a strong stance against the publication of the cartoons, calling it a "reckless move," and defending the decision to pull the newspapers.

"The administration has taken this action on grounds that publication of the caricatures represents a reckless invitation to public disorder and humiliation," said a statement. "The university acknowledges the debates about press freedom and responsibility generated by this matter."


My thanks to [livejournal.com profile] london_calling for calling this news item to my attention. I'm just sorry that this news item didn't cover the school administration's straightforward defense of The Cadre.

More on this later.
Page generated Apr. 3rd, 2026 12:24 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios