rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Dangerous Minds notes "Mingering Mike", a fictional soul music star created by an outsider artist.

  • Noisey takes a look at the roots of Madonna in the post-punk music scene of New York City in the late 1970s and early 1980s.

  • Dangerous Minds looks at the Alex Chilton anti-AIDS song of 1986, "No Sex."

  • NOW Toronto interviewed iskwe in February about her music commemorating dead Indigenous people in Canada.

  • Damon Krukowski writes at Pitchfork about the implications of the accidental deletion by Myspace of a decade and a half worth of music there. How can libraries and archives be preserved against the vagaries of technology?

rfmcdonald: (Default)
GNXP's Razib Khan created an interesting infographic the other day.

A tale of three firms via Google Trends. I’ve been checking in on Facebook’s numbers in Google Trends for years to see if I can see evidence of plateauing. Not quite yet. Interestingly all three companies were drawing similar search traffic on Google at the end of 2008, after which Myspace began its long descent, while Facebook had an inverted trajectory, and Yahoo! kept muddling along….




For the record, I'm active on Facebook, I use my Yahoo! account as a public E-mail address, for my E-mail discussion lists, and for my Flickr account, and I've not touched MySpace not least because each time I visit a MySpace page on my old desktop the browser crashes.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Wired isn't very positive about MySpace's future.

First, the audience it stole from Friendster left for Facebook. Now, Owen Van Natta, the former Facebook executive Rupert Murdoch hired less than a year ago to reverse the site’s declining fortunes, has also left, MySpace announced late Wednesday night.

The bell has been tolling for MySpace for years, with users leaving the site pretty much as they found it: as a place to hear what a band sounds like and see what they look like in a matter of seconds, rather than as a place where they establish an online identity and communicate with friends.

After signing on last April, Van Natta wisely acknowledged this change in how people were using MySpace — as a media site rather than as a social network — by doubling down on the ad-supported MySpace Music service. However, the company was not able to fix problems with the service including poor integration with existing band pages, which left many users confused or uninterested in the service.

According to an Ad Age source, Van Natta bailed on MySpace because he was frustrated by the company’s “slow pace of change” and “entrenched culture.” A dearth of fast, competent, loyal software engineers in the Los Angeles area reportedly slowed things down even further. MySpace is headquartered in Beverly Hills, in southern California. Facebook, which evolves its design and feature set so often that some users can’t keep up with the changes, is located in the more technology-oriented Palo Alto, California.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
This Techcrunch map breaks down the countries of the world by dominant social networking system. As the title suggests, Facebook is in the lead globally.



Facebook, with over 350 million users, is the undisputed leader of social networking in the English speaking parts of the world, and has been making strides in Latin-America, Europe and Africa as well. Based on Alexa data only, Facebook has even taken over Orkut in India, historically a high-flyer in those parts. Google’s social network remains the most trafficked in Brazil, however.

Facebook clone Vkontakte.ru has been able to resist and stop Facebook from becoming the leader in Russia. It’s worth noting that Vkontakte is largely owned by Digital Sky Technologies, which also owns a significant stake in Facebook, so you can see how they could potentially melt together in the future.

Hi5 has also seen Facebook take over most of the territories where it was leading, and has only been able to stop the social network from dominance in Peru, Portugal, Romania, Thailand and Mongolia. Meanwhile, QQ is still ahead of everyone else in China, where the number of Internet users is expected to double and reach a staggering 840 million by 2013.

Nowhere to be seen on the map: MySpace (which only leads on the Island of Guam).
rfmcdonald: (Default)
What did MySpace miss out on? According to Slate's Farhad Manjoo, the chance to become the Internet's glue. It's popular, sure:

Nearly a year ago—in the course of cajoling people into joining the ubiquitous social network—I marveled at Facebook's astonishing growth rate: The site had just signed up its 150 millionth member, and about 370,000 people were joining every day. "At this rate," I wrote, "Facebook will grow to nearly 300 million people by this time next year." I confess, though, that I didn't think it was possible for the site to keep growing at that rate. Every hot Web site begins to fade at some point, and back then, the tech world was enamored of an upstart that was gaining lots of attention from celebrities and the media—Twitter. Even Facebook seemed scared of the micro-blogging site. In June, it redesigned its user pages to display updates as quickly as Twitter does, a move that prompted a barrage of threats to quit.

Those threats were empty. And so, it seems, was any threat posed by Twitter. Facebook's growth rate has actually accelerated during the past year. In September, it announced that it had reached 300 million members, and this week, it passed 350 million. About 600,000 people around the world now sign up every day. Twitter hasn't released any recent usage numbers, but traffic to its site is flattening. Indeed, it's likely that Twitter has fewer members than the number of people who play the Facebook game FarmVille (69 million!).


The site's impact goes beyond numbers.

With Facebook Connect, the company is expanding its footprint beyond Facebook.com, spidering into every far-flung corner online. You can now update your Facebook status, add comments, or chat with your friends while surfing CNN, the Huffington Post, Yelp, Digg, and Slate, among other sites. On Wednesday, Yahoo announced that it would integrate Facebook Connect with all of its services. Though Yahoo hasn't explained how the partnership will work, you'll presumably be able to share your photos between Flickr (owned by Yahoo) and Facebook or comment on stories at Yahoo News using your Facebook profile. This huge partnership will bring Facebook closer to becoming what has long been a holy grail in the Web business—a kind of universal sign-on service, the one place that stores the world's social information.

Facebook's continued rise prompts several questions. Why do people keep joining? Will it peak and begin to decline, like so many social networks that came before? And more importantly, do we want a universal sign-on service, a single Web site that stores all our relationships, comments, pictures, and status updates?

Yes, I think we do. In fact, I'd argue that's why Facebook keeps growing and won't peak anytime soon—it is becoming part of the infrastructure of the Web, every bit as indispensable to our daily wanderings as Google or e-mail. When I pushed people to join Facebook in January, I reasoned that the site had become "a routine aid to social interaction, like e-mail and antiperspirant." In the months since, that has only become more true. It's the first place you think of to find new pictures of your nephew, to share an amusing anecdote with your college friends, or even to look for a job. The New York Times' Nick Bilton points out that Facebook's mutual-friends list transforms new relationships: "When I go to a meeting or party, I take a minute to look up who's attending and quickly explore friends we might share," he writes. "It's the perfect digital icebreaker."
rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Financial Times's Matthew Garrahan profiles MySpace's decline from social networking hegemon to increasingly sickly competitor for market share. The cause? According to Garrahan, the ignorance of News Corp's Rupert Murdoch of the Internet, clashes between an unprofessional culture at MySpace and demanding News Corp people, and a fatal failure to actually innovate (blame it on both sides, since they're blaming each other). Garrahan ends with a note of skepticism about plans to use the strong MySpace sense of communtity and strength in music and video to relaunch the platform, since these plans have apparently been afoot for a while. Besides, as I've blogged several times (1, 2, 3), many of MySpace's core demographics have already defected to Facebook, and the ones that remain aren't necessarily very attractive. MySpace isn't going to disappear, it has its own core user population, but it has lost to Facebook.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Something about the way I sank into the chair and yawning last night around 8 o'clock caused my to pop my my right temporomandibular joint, since it has caused me a lot of hassle. First I had to call Telehealth to be sure and get told that I should check it one, then I had to go to a walk-in clinic downtown to be told that I should see my dentist, then I walk down the street to my dentist and make an appointment for a week's time, then I have to go home with the strong suggestion that I should rest the jaw for the next bit, this rest including no "jaw jaw jaw." This unpleasantness, along with the strong desire to keep my dull pain from becoming actual shooting pain never mind wake-up-screaming-in-the-night pain, means that a pleasant night based on oral communication isn't going to be. Tabernac.

What will I do instead? Electronic communication will suffice nicely for the next bit, which works out since I wanted to write a blog post that began with Tumblr. A microblogging site like Twitter that includes an ability to readily share photos and video, this social networking service got some coverage recently in the free daily TTC-ubiquitous Metro, "Ups and Downs of a Tumblette's Life". "Tumblette."

Canadian Jaime-Leigh Fairbrother (a.k.a jaimeleigh) is supposedly a Tumblette: young, sexy and an over-sharer. The Tumblette — a vogue-ish tag for a female type who blogs on the website Tumblr — “lifecasts” with an edge.

[. . . ]

On her “for the story goes” Tumblr, the Toronto-based Jaime-Leigh Fairbrother bares all daily — from a series of self-point-and-shoot photos the 20-something blond snapped for a Semi-Naked-Picture-Day, to a controversial posting that included a spreadsheet mapping her bed-hopping history.

“People have a weird love for these sexual things,” says Fairbrother, who in person, is surprisingly demure. “We all talk about it... yet if you’re honest and shameless about it, you’re judged.”

At first glance, Fairbrother’s Tumblr is a female version of Tucker Max, whose drunken bro-ish hijinks recently made it to the big screen in I Hope They Serve Beer in Hell.

It’s made Fairbrother a love-her-or-hate-her Tumblette: She’s garnered a cult of 800 to 900 active followers and, last week, was ranking higher than other micro-celebrities and fellow oversharers, like Internet star Julia Allison.

Fairbrother’s quick to recognize her Tumblr began over a year ago as a lonely, soliloquy-ing stream.

Her postings quickly garnered followers, especially through Tumblr’s unique re-blogging feature — the re-posting of content allows users to trace how one post is amplified or subverted by other users — which created a dialogue that would bounce between her, her followers and even non-followers.


(Jamie-Leigh's Tumblr blog is here. I like.)

Many of the Tumblr elements described above--the ability to share and reshare links, the ability to construct communities of readers, and so on--have been active functions of any number of blogging platforms and social networking systems for years. boasts about the Telegraph that "the smart thing to be doing online these days is tumblelogging, which is to weblogs what text messages are to email - short, to the point, and direct."

What interested me most about the article apart from its content was the way it positioned a certain demographic as core, 20-something women who are quite active and often very open online. This sort of association with an online social networking service with a stereotype isn't unfamiliar, and may not even be inaccurate, since social networks are famously lumpy. We're familiar with how MySpace is especially common among musicians and certain American socioeconomic classes, how Orkut surprisingly came to dominate the Brazilian and take off in absolute numbers in India, how English Canada went Facebook-mad long before French Canada, the networks which ensure LinkedIn is populated very largely by professionals and professional-wannabes, and, closer to home, the way that Livejournal is famously big among Russophones. My own blog presence is based on Livejournal since that's the platform where my friends and acquaintances were, and I'd be surprised if that wasn't the sort of thing that influenced all my readers at some point. One may as well be amazed that Flickr's users use that service to store and reproduce images.

Some stereotypes are accurate, even useful. Others, not so much. The use of the diminuitive "ette" to describe hard-core users of Tumblr struck me as interesting, inasmuch as "ette" is one of those terms that is either sexist or reclaimed from sexism. The latter is the one that applies here, but real stigma is elsewhere. I think particularly about how some talk about Livejournal as an embarrassing wasteland populated by whiny teenagers. While I was flattered when one blogger years ago cited A Bit More Detail as one of the few good things on Livejournal, I was not impressed even more by the insult paid to the hundreds of Livejournal users who are as interesting bloggers as anyone. Are Blogspot and Typepad really that much better? This prejudice has even been internalized: the maintainers of the very interesting [livejournal.com profile] russiamagazine community preface most of their posts by saying that the "Russian blogosphere conveniently, if bafflingly, revolves around LJ."

I don't like this prejudice. Negative stereotypes are always bad, especially the sweeping ones, never mind how these particular ones discourage some from taking full ("Why use Livejournal if people won't take me seriously?") and lead others to ignorantly reject huge, perfectly enjoyable, swathes of our great global online community. It's inevitable that the prejudice that infects humanity generally would manifest itself in this specific form, I suppose, and the sheer size of the online community makes picking-and-choosing inevitable regardless of the motives involved, too, but I still feel let down. What happened to the dreams of unfettered global community? More, was wanting to believe in them really inevitable?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
CBC refers to Eszter Hargittai's research on social class and social networking. (A while ago, I blogged about that research here.

Unpublished research by Eszter Hargittai of Northwestern University in Chicago found big differences between American users of Facebook and users of MySpace.

"Existing social divisions translate online," said the associate professor in the communications studies department. "These sites are mainly used for hanging out with people you already know."

Hargittai's research found a difference by race, ethnicity and parental education in the U.S. Hispanic students, for example, are more likely to use MySpace because that's where "their friends hang out."

Facebook users were more likely to have grown up in a household where parents had graduate degrees, she found.


Facebook also dominates Canada, with previous trends continuing strongly.

Class divisions exist between those who use Facebook versus MySpace, with the former attracting a better educated clientele, at least in the U.S., new research suggests.

In Canada, Facebook is the hands-down dominant social media web tool, and it's not because everyone in Canada is better educated than their U.S. counterparts.

"We are a Facebook country," said Rhonda McEwen, who teaches in the faculty of information studies at the University of Toronto and specializes in new media and the information practices of young people.

Facebook users in Canada include everyone from teens to grandparents, she said.

"The younger teens here don't know MySpace. They don't even recognize the term, which is really surprising to me, given how big it is in the United States."


Facebook is triumphing over MySpace in the United States.

Facebook is leaping ahead of MySpace to turn into the most popular social networking site in the U.S. Yet although Facebook nailed down 58.6 percent of all U.S visits to social networking sites in September -- for an increase of 194 percent -- use of Twitter surged even more astoundingly, according to Experian Hitwise.

Only a year ago, MySpace held a commanding lead of 66.8 percent among the 155 social networking sites studied. But since then, U.S. users' visits to MySpace have plummeted by 55 percent to a total of just 30.2 percent, leaving Facebook the new winner in the social networking sweepstakes, say statistics released by the number cruncher last week.


As for MySpace? Um, there's issues.

Most people I went to college with had Facebook accounts before MySpace, since I went to one of the earliest schools whose students and alumni were invited to Facebook. But MySpace soon became a much more popular site, and anyone could join. So lots of my other friends quickly signed up. Many of them, including myself, have since left the site, but remain active on Facebook. So what's going on?

I almost equate it with the Microsoft-Yahoo/Apple-Google disparity. Products from the former grouping generally gave its users more power over the interface and had an early mover advantage, so they dominated initially. But since then, consumers have shifted to prefer the simpler, more elegant interface in the Apple-Google style.

For example, one of the reasons I left MySpace was because I would receive entirely too many sketchy friend or band requests that did not interest me. A few times I clicked on pages and narrowly escaped getting infected with malware/viruses. Even though I had a lot more control over customizing my MySpace page, I began not to care. Some people's pages were also too customized -- it became annoying. I came to prefer Facebook's simplicity and functionality. I made a similar shift from Yahoo to Google, though I have not weaned myself off Yahoo services entirely, since its offerings are broader than Google's.



Have I mentioned that I never got a MySpace page in the first place, and that the only two people I know who have those pages use it to redirect people to their Facebook and Livejournal profiles?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Via Facebook, I've come across an interesting study on Facebook and MySpace use, summarized here by The Globe and Mail's Matthew Ingram.

Danah Boyd, a sociologist and researcher in the U.S. who specializes in youth culture and online social networks such as Facebook and MySpace, has posted a draft version of a new paper she is writing on what might loosely be referred to as "class divisions" between the two popular social networking sites. Although she says that the differences between the two audiences are not strictly class-based, in the sense that they don't really follow economic lines, there appears to be a clear difference between teens who gravitate to MySpace and those that tend to join Facebook.

For the most part, Ms. Boyd says, the younger users on MySpace are what she calls "subaltern" -- a term meaning subordinate, or lower in station -- in the sense that they are outcasts in some way or another, either because they are involved in a social sub-group of some kind (i.e., they are gay, or goth, or interested in punk music) or they are a member of a racial or cultural group that is non-mainstream (i.e., black, Hispanic, Asian, etc.). Teens that join Facebook, she says, are what she calls "hegemonic," meaning they are sympathetic to mainstream society in some way.


Boyd's paper is here, and her blog posting announcing the paper's initial findings is here. One blogged criticism of her work is telling.

The conclusions coincide, satisfyingly, with the presumptions of Facebook users with snobbish disdain for the ghetto design of Myspace pages. They're probably true. And Boyd's essay has the patina of academic credibility, obtained through the liberal use of lingo from critical theory such as "hegemonic" -- by which I think the author means the cool kids. But, astonishingly, there's a complete lack of survey data to support the thesis. If this Berkeley PhD candidate really had six months for the project, how hard would it be to recruit a few hundred survey respondents? And some of the conclusions are truly pedestrian: the research suggests that Facebook users are more likely to go to college. Well, Mark Zuckerberg's social utility started -- duh -- as an online facebook for college students, so it's hardly so surprising that it would do well among that demo.


The statistical sampling that she describes--formal interviews in eight states which capture a variety of variables, analyses of apparently random MySpace profiles, very limited access to Facebook profiles, an undersampling of users from "rural environments and [...] the deep south"--certainly has its flaws, though I do think that this paper might still indicate certain interesting trends. For the sake of her--at least superficially plausible--thesis I only hope Boyd can get much better data.
Page generated Jan. 29th, 2026 11:19 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios