rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Sociologist Dan Hirschman is unimpressed by Mark Regnerus' claim that porn viewing predisposes heterosexual men to support same-sex marriage. Yes, it's actually a causal claim.

  • Centauri Dreams' Paul Gilster notes a new method for detecting planets, one relying on patterns in the dust clouds orbiting stars.

  • At Crooked Timber, Daniel Davies uses a metaphor to explore the insufficient nature of criticisms of religion to believers. Who, after all, believes in Canada?

  • Marginal Revolution's Alex Tabarrok takes issue with the New York Times' claims that its coverage of poor conditions at Chinese factories have led to improved wages. In actual fact, wages have been increasing for a decade as part of China's growth.

  • At Registan, Myles G. Smith notes the extent to which the Kazakh-language Wikipedia appears to be dominated by state-sponsored volunteers.

  • Torontoist recounts the successful restoration of a decrepit building downtown on Yonge Street.

  • Window on Eurasia notes Russian commentary on regionalism in the eastern Latvian region of Latgale.

  • Wonkman tells us why we should care about Susan Sontag--her controversial 1982 suggestion that the left got it wrong on Communism speaks to an admirable intellectual honesty.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
I was so caught up in reading the 1980 book by Susan Sontag (Wikipedia, official site), essay collection Under the Sign of Saturn, that I missed my subway transfer to a northbound route and overshot to Sherbourne station, and would certainly have come in late to work if not for the kind lady who said that the escalators provided a much quicker route to the westbound platform than the stairs. I returned the book that day to the friend who'd lent it to me and cherished it, pasting a poicture of Sontag in Sarajevo on the back cover.

What is it about this book that inspires such devotion? It was Sontag's beautiful prose style, at once langourous and critical, conversational and disciplined. It was also Sontag's beautiful critical mind that did it for me, that marvellous instrument that was profoundly informed and profoundly honest. It's that mind that inspired Andrew Sullivan to create the "Susan Sontag Award" as a club with which to beat people whose opinions he didn't like, one reason among several, incidentally, why I think he deserves to be hit, repeatedly. It's this mind that wrote the six wonderful essays contained in Under the Sign of Saturn, five of which were biographies of intellectuals one sort or another--Roland Barthes, Elias Canetti, Antonin Artaud, Walter Benjamin and Paul Goodman. These biographical essays were written about all kinds of intellectuals--people she knew and people she could never have known, people she liked as people and people she didn't, avant-garde playwrites and Marxist social theorists alike--and were, again, rigourous and honest. The centrepiece of the book is her famous 1975 essay "Fascinating Fascism", the essay that begins with a withering takedown of Leni Riefenstahl's claims to be an honest person and a critical director and an innovative one, passing from there to examine the cult of the perfect body and the transformation of Nazi ideology into sexual fetishes.

I haven't read much of Sontag's work, but I still miss her. We all need wonderful public intellectuals like her plying their crafts, saving us from ourselves and letting us make sense of the past. Everywhere.
Page generated Jul. 18th, 2025 03:38 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios