This is a sign of St. Michael Archangel, a church of the Serbian Orthodox denomination located at 212 Delaware Avenue just north of Bloor Street West.



In May, New England's fishermen will again see a cut to the number of fish they can catch, this time so deeply that the historic industry's existence is threatened from Rhode Island to Maine. But as hard as the cuts are likely to hit fishing communities, local seafood eaters may not notice at all. In the region's markets, grocery stores and restaurants, imported fish dominate, and the cuts make that less likely to change.
The cuts will shrink the catch limit 77 percent for cod in the Gulf of Maine and 61 percent for cod in Georges Bank, off southeastern Massachusetts. That's the worst of a series of reductions to the catch of bottom-dwelling groundfish, such as haddock and flounder, that many fear could be fatal to the industry.
[. . .]
For fish consumers, a sharp drop in the local groundfish catch may jar a select group of diners who seek fish caught that day. But the cut's effects may not ripple further than that.
Just 9 percent of the seafood eaten in the United States is domestically caught, the federal government estimates. In New England, locally caught cod was just a slightly larger fraction of all cod eaten, 12 percent, according to fisheries economist Jenny Sun of the Portland, Maine-based Gulf of Maine Research Institute. And she estimates that could drop to 4 percent after the coming cuts.
Much of the imported cod is caught and frozen in Norway and cut in China, and there's plenty of it, Sun said. If the local cod catch dips to near nothing, fish processors "could easily fill in with imports," Sun said.
In fact, the biggest issue for one Maine seafood processing executive has been the perception that the New England industry's troubles mean he won't have fish.
The Pacific Ocean is home to almost 20 percent of the world’s languages, especially with the great diversity of indigenous languages across Melanesia. In New Caledonia, there are twenty-eight Kanak languages, eleven dialects and one creole (Tayo), with an estimated 70,000 speakers from a total population of 254,000. For the director of the Academy of Kanak Languages, Weniko Ihage, this diversity is an asset for society. “There’s a panoply of 28 Kanak languages, each of them very different from the other,” Ihage told Islands Business at his office in Noumea.
“Most Kanak languages exist only in spoken form, so the mission of the ALK is to establish rules of usage and to help promote and develop all Kanak languages and dialects.”
While there are thousands of people fluent in four or five of the major Kanak languages, other smaller languages and dialects are endangered.
Colonisation has disrupted the transmission of language between generations and today many parents value fluency in French for their children, as a pre-requisite for advancement, jobs and higher education.
“The number of speakers varies from one island to another, from one area to another,” Ihage says. “There are four main languages: Drehu spoken on Lifou; Nengone spoken on Mare; Paicî around the town of Poindimie; and Ajië, which is spoken in the Houailou region.
“These four languages have the largest number of speakers, they’re also the languages taught in school, which senior students can study at the level of the baccalaureate, just as they might study other regional languages in France like Breton or Corsican.” The usage of Kanak languages is tied to official French attitudes to cultural policy. As France joined the European Union in 1992, Article 2 of the French Constitution was changed to state for the first time that “the language of the Republic is French.”
France puts significant resources into promoting the French language through its education system, the Organisation Internationale de la Francophonie (OIF) and institutions like the Alliance Française.
For colonised people within the French empire, however, the use of their own language is tied to broader questions of identity, culture and sovereignty.
He has a history of sometimes characterizing the school in an unflattering light and his actions often put students and staff under a harsh glare.
So parents from Don Bosco Catholic Secondary — the Etobicoke school some parents says is too-often described as “Rob Ford’s” — met Tuesday night to discuss whether the costs outweigh the benefits of having the high-profile mayor as their football coach.
[. . .]
The TCDSB launched an investigation earlier this month into statements Ford made about the school during an interview with Sun News — including that some students would have “no reason to go to school” if not for football.
“You can’t tell them to get an education. But I use the football as a carrot,” he said.
Following the broadcast, a “significant” number of teachers signed an anonymous letter sent to senior board officials — saying Ford’s comments were “disgusting” and depicted the school in a “demeaning way that was filled with untruths” — prompting the board’s investigation.
[. . .]
While [Teresa Bridport, vice-chair of the school’s parent council] acknowledged that may be cause for concern at Tuesday’s meeting, the problems with Ford stem back to the previous football season, she said.
“Just the chaos it created in our school to have the mayor as our coach, how disruptive it was, for the administration, staff, for the teachers, for the students, just because he’s such a high profile person now — it certainly puts our school under a microscope.”