![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
rfmcdonaldhings like this LifeSite article, describing a Spanish bishop's denuncation of a new abortion law, confuse me.
This is fiery language, but yet. If Bishop Hellín really did believe that this law was authorizing the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocents a year, mightn't this horror inspire him and his followers to not merely denounce the Spanish parliament's laws but to form an active resistance to this genocidal tyranny, shooting down the mass murderers who took the lives of innocents for money and the degenerate politicians and public figures who condoned this and--obviously--the slatterns who chose to deal with the miracle of life by commissioning hits on the ultimate helpless?
"If," I think, is the operative word.
In a statement published on the bishops' Catholic Information Service, Gil Hellín laments the recent promulgation of the law, an "evil law which is directly opposed to right reason and the most elemental justice. Such is the law that establishes that the Spanish have the right to kill the unborn, as long as they do it before 14 weeks."
"Let us diagnose it with total clarity: this law is no law, although it is presented as such by some political and legislative bodies. And it isn't because no one has the right to eliminate an innocent. For that reason, it doesn't obligate. Even more, it demands a head-on opposition without reservation. Right reason cannot admit as a right the killing of an innocent person."
The new abortion law, which is being contested before Spain's Constitutional Tribunal, abolishes penalties for all abortions during the first 14 weeks of pregnancy. It also allows minors to obtain abortions without parental permission, although they must first inform their parents of their intention to do so.
The archbishop rejects arguments that claim the law is somehow valid because it was passed by the legislature and approved according to the required legal processes.
"It is a fallacy to affirm that this law has been approved by the majority of the Parliament and that this represents the majority of the citizens, or to say that if the Constitutional Tribunal decrees its conformity [with the Constitution] it would be disobedience to oppose it, and would deserve a punishment. The fallacy consists in attributing to politicians, judges, or citizens a right that they don't have, and no one has the right to legislate that an innocent can be killed."
This is fiery language, but yet. If Bishop Hellín really did believe that this law was authorizing the murder of hundreds of thousands of innocents a year, mightn't this horror inspire him and his followers to not merely denounce the Spanish parliament's laws but to form an active resistance to this genocidal tyranny, shooting down the mass murderers who took the lives of innocents for money and the degenerate politicians and public figures who condoned this and--obviously--the slatterns who chose to deal with the miracle of life by commissioning hits on the ultimate helpless?
"If," I think, is the operative word.
