We have a war in Libya, now.
What next?
Over at Lawyers, Guns and Money, Robert Farley argues that the
Libyan no-fly zone is
not a no-fly zone so much as an air supremacy zone, that is, that the coalition air strikes will be aimed not only at keeping Gadaffi's military forces out of the air but at supporting the rebels in their counteroffensives. In another post, he
plausubly argues that Gadaffi's forces will be hard-pressed to deal with these ground-support attacks, on technological and morale grounds. The problem with this is that, as Noel Maurer
suggests in a recent post, the Libyan civil war seems ready to become a protracted conflict.
Minimally-trained infantry should be able to outflank government forces outside the cities, but the rebels seem to be worse than minimally-trained. Maybe this is my own experience talking, but they seem like mobs with guns, rather than a serious fighting force. The West could send in advisors, which would, of course, be serious mission creep. If it happens, I’d bet on the British doing it, not the United States.
The truth is, neither side the Libyan civil war appears to be particularly competent. (This should not be surprising.) In the words of a former RAF officer (and personal friend): “I think holding onto small cities was a mistake, the rebels have bogged themselves down there and waited for the fight to come. Ideally, defence should have been based on the ‘restricted block methodology’ (ie: Stalingrad) freeing up manpower to build SUV mobile platoons heading for Tripoli and locking the government in. Not rocket science, infantry 101 which concerns me about the skills of the regular Libyan NCO/Officers.” This graduate of Fort Benning, for what little that is worth (and truly, it is not worth much at all; the only times I have been in a combat zone have been as a civilian) concurs. Andrew Exum also concurs. (Oh man did his post bring back memories of digging. And getting tear-gassed. But I digress.)
[. . .]
In this war, the logistical advantage is gone: the U.N. forces are going to make sure of that. In the east, you are going to have ugly ugly irregular fighting until the last of the Gaddafi forces are gone. In the west, though, it depends. One smart policy would be to promise financial rewards to defecting Libyan forces, including foreign-born militia. With economic sanctions on, Gaddafi is down to paying to his troops from his cash reserves. He can’t export oil or gas, he can’t access his foreign assets. Libya is also an importer of gasoline (this is not unusual for oil producing countries). The rebels knew this, and hijacked vessels headed to Gaddafi-held territory, but now NATO navies are enforcing a blockade. Moreover, the Ras Lanouf refinery is damaged and on fire.
Another smart policy would be to call off the International Criminal Court and offer a blanket amnesty. I am sure that Venezuela would be happy to take the Colonel. (Once upon a time, I would have thought Saudi Arabia, and that might still be a possibility, even with the recent collapse in U.S.-Saudi relations.)
In short, the U.N. coalition is going to dismantle Gaddafi’s air defenses and enforce a no-drive zone. The rebels will root out government forces in the east in awful fighting to which the press will probably not pay much attention. Then we are going to get a waiting game. Even with sanctions, Gaddafi can hold out for a long time, especially if his troops think that the alternative is death. Thus, bribes ... but somehow I do not think that is going to happen. In short, we could have a long waiting game, unless
Who knows? Maybe we
will see a separation, at least
de facto, of
Cyrenaica from the rest of Libya.
What do you think will happen next? If I had to bet I'd assume that the at least temporary separation of Cyrenaica from the rest of Libya, combined with nasty urban warfare and a general tactical stalemate, is most likely. How long Gadaffi's regime will be able to hold up in western Libya given sanctions and continuing airstrikes is another question, one I don't feel competent in predicting weighted predictions for.
You?