Jill Mahoney AND Leyland Cecco's photo-heavy article in The Globe and Mail looks at the complexities of urban forestry in Toronto.
[There] are among at least 20 victims of falling tree limbs in Toronto in the past seven years, according to a Globe and Mail investigation that found the city has paid out more than $2-million in liability claims.
In addition, countless others have had close calls, saved by a few lucky moments that kept them out of harm’s way or by their ability to hear the cracking of a branch and sprint to safety.
The toll raises difficult questions about whether the city is doing enough to prevent such mishaps by adequately maintaining its 4.1 million trees – one-fifth of which are in fair, poor or even worse condition – and protecting people from the rare but sometimes catastrophic damage they can cause.
[. . .]
Toronto, which bills itself as “a city within a park,” is facing sweeping challenges in caring for its trees, with pressure from all sides. With a chronic budget crunch, the city admits it is not pruning public trees as often as its own experts recommend and acknowledges that it relies heavily on residents to report possibly dangerous trees.
At the same time, Toronto’s park, street and ravine trees have been hit hard by the destructive emerald ash borer, the 2013 ice storm and summer droughts, which can all weaken trees.
Despite this, officials are under pressure to increase the canopy and the significant benefits that trees provide to cities, including cleaning the air, cooling neighbourhoods, conserving energy and increasing property values. In addition, many residents have strong attachments to trees and vehemently oppose cutting them down.













































