The Palestinian Authority has
chosen an interesting method of trying to promote Palestinian statehood.
The Palestinians on Monday made a formal bid to have the no-longer-so-little town of Bethlehem, birthplace of Jesus Christ, added to UNESCO's list of World Heritage sites.
"We are very proud to announce that we have submitted the nomination file of Bethlehem: birthplace of Jesus -- Church of the Nativity and the Pilgrimage Route ... to the World Heritage Centre," tourism minister Khulud Daibes told reporters.
The addition of the West Bank town to the UNESCO list should have been almost automatic and accomplished a long time ago, but like most issues in the Holy Land, it has become entangled in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
And the Palestinians are hoping that getting the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization to recognise Bethlehem as a part of Palestinian cultural heritage will give impetus to their struggle to establish a state.
"This timing is crucial for us, it is part and parcel of our plan to end the (Israeli) occupation and build the institutions of the state of Palestine," Daibes said.
In the absence of constructive peace talks with Israel, Palestinian prime minister Salam Fayyad has been leading an effort to build institutions for a de-facto state.
They feel they have a strong case for Bethlehem's recognition when the UN committee meets to decide on the nominations in July 2012.
And UNESCO officials agree.
"Who can question that the Nativity Church is a world heritage site?" said Louise Haxthausen, head of UNESCO's Ramallah office, who has worked with the Palestinian tourism ministry in preparing the bid.
But in the end, UNESCO may not even be able to consider the bid for the same reason that it has not been added to the list to date: Palestine is not yet a recognised state.
At the same time as filing the nomination, the Palestinians have also applied for membership of the World Heritage Committee.
The tourism minister said she was hopeful the application would be accepted, though she conceded there was "no plan B."
The efforts by the Palestinian Authority--its authority limited to the West Bank, granted--to build its competence, going for more and better governance,
have been getting results, with a slew of Latin American countries recognizing a Palestinian state and many western European countries upgrading their representation.
I'm quite for this. Apart from protecting a critical space for world culture, anything that brings the Palestinian Authority deeper into the international system, requiring it to fulfill legal obligations, is a good thing. Who knows? Maybe the explicit protection of a Christian site might help in a revival of the old tradition of Palestinian secular nationalism.
Besides, one thing that WikiLeaks has proven is that the Israeli government has proven decidedly unwilling to make any concessions to the Authority, notwithstanding the concessions that the Authority has offered to Israel. Israel--like Palestine, true--needs to be pressured into being an honest partner. Broader recognition of Palestinian statehood will hopefully do that.