rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • With new translation facilities in place, MP Robert-Falcon Ouellette has delivered the first speech translated from the Cree delivered in the House of Commons. Global News reports.

  • La Presse looks at the newly-lodged land claim of the Attikamekw to much of the Haute-Mauricie region.

  • Brielle Morgan at The Discourse looks at the necessary, but neglected, role of "roots workers" in keeping indigenous children in care in British Columbia connected with their cultures.

  • Tanya Talaga at the Toronto Star looks at the serious impact of climate change on many Indigenous communities, starting with the High Arctic.

  • The New Yorker takes a look at the literary success of queer Greenlandic writer Niviaq Korneliussen.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • I entirely agree with the argument of Aluki Kotierk, writing at MacLean's, who thinks the Inuit of Nunavut have been entirely too passive, too nice, in letting Inuktitut get marginalized. Making it a central feature in education is the least that can be done. (Québec-style language policies work.)

  • Although ostensibly a thriving language in many domains of life, the marginalization of the Icelandic language in the online world could be an existential threat. The Guardian reports.

  • As part of a bid to keep alive Ladino, traditional language of the Sephardic Jews, Spain has extended to the language official status including support and funding. Ha'aretz reports.

  • A new set of policies of Spain aiming at promoting the Spanish language have been criticized by some in Hispanic American states, who call the Spanish moves excessively unilateral. El Pais reports.

  • isiXhosa, the language of the Xhosa people of South Africa, is getting huge international attention thanks to its inclusion in Black Panther. The Toronto Star reports.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Bag News Notes comments on one of the iconic photos of the Boston Marathon bombing aftermath, of an elderly man on the ground in front of three cops. It turns out that the man, a jogger, ended up coming second in his age class.

  • Burgh Diaspora's Jim Russell notes that migration and economic development are quite compatible, even emigration--migrating professionals often return to their community of birth, bringing skills and connections acquired abroad with them.

  • Centauri Dreams' Paul Gilster notes the few surveys of the nearby universe for Dyson spheres, vast artifacts of extraterrestrial civilizations. Nothing has been found so far!

  • Bostonian Daniel Drezner posts about the necessity of reacting to the Boston Marathon bombings calmly and rationally.

  • Joe. My. God. picks up on a Paraguayan presidential candidates vitriolic condemnation of same-sex marriage and non-heterosexuals, and on the response to said.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money observes that left-wing terrorism in the United States is pretty marginal, certainly more so than right-wing terrorism.

  • The New APPS Blog notes that a great way to ensure the full development of young children is to talk to them.

  • Normblog's Norman Geras is quite unimpressed with an article expressing opposition to same-sex marriage (here, in New Zealand) that amounts to "just because."

  • The Power and the Money's Noel Maurer lists the numerous severe economic problems facing post-Chavez Venezuela. Perhaps, for the sake of multi-party democracy in that country, the defeat of Capriles by Chavez's successor Maduro is for the best.

  • Towleroad notes the success of same-sex marriage in New Zealand.

  • The Volokh Conspiracy's Sasha Volokh is very unimpressed with the content of Russian school history textbooks, propagandizing on behalf of empire and minimizing state atrocities as they do.

  • Window on Eurasia notes that wealthy China is starting to take an interest in the Arctic, perhaps at the expense of Russia.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Barrie McKenna's Globe and Mail article discussing what seems to be growing discussion in Iceland about replacing the Icelandic króna with the Canadian dollar has gone viral across my Facebook feed.

For many Canadians who read this, learning that any country--even one as small as Iceland--wants to unite in some fashion with Canada on grounds of our economic strength is a massive ego boost. McKenna does highlight the importance that the extension of Canadian money elsewhere in the Arctic might have on Canadian heft, at least the perceived importance. As far as I can tell, the Icelanders are still debating the question (to put it mildly), while very few people in Canada have been thinking about Iceland at all since the stabilization of the economy.

One note: Adoption of the Canadian dollar would also complicate Iceland's emergent relationship with the European Union. How would it work for a European Union member-state that adopted the currency of a non-member, indeed, the currency of a non-European country? (I've joked in the past that maybe Canada should join the European Union since someone has to pay for Romania, but seeing what's going on with Greece takes the fun out of that joke.) [livejournal.com profile] nwhyte?

[T]iny Iceland, still reeling from the aftershocks of the devastating collapse of its banks in 2008, is looking longingly to the loonie as the salvation from wild economic gyrations and suffocating capital controls.

And for the first time, the Canadian government says it’s open to discussing the idea.

In brief remarks to be delivered Saturday in Reykjavik, Canadian ambassador Alan Bones will tell Icelanders that if they truly want the Canadian dollar, Canada is ready to talk.

But he will warn Icelanders that unilaterally adopting the loonie comes with significant risk, including complete loss of control over their monetary policy because the Bank of Canada makes decisions only for Canadians and the Canadian economy. He’ll caution, for example, that giving up the krona in favour of the Canadian dollar (CAD/USD-I1.01-0.004-0.36%) will leave the country with few levers, short of layoffs, to counter financial shocks and fluctuations in the loonie.

[. . .]

There’s a compelling economic case why Iceland would want to adopt the Canadian dollar. It offers the tantalizing prospect of a stable, liquid currency that roughly tracks global commodity prices, nicely matching Iceland’s own economy, which is dependent on fish and aluminum exports.

There’s also a more sentimental reason.

“The average person looks at it this way: Canada is a younger version of the U.S. Canada has more natural resources than the U.S., it’s less developed, has more land, lots of water,” explained Heidar Gudjonsson, an economist and chairman of the Research Center for Social and Economic Studies, Iceland’s largest think tank.

“And Canada thinks about the Arctic.”

In a recent Gallup poll, seven out of 10 Icelanders said they would happily dump their volatile and fragile krona for another currency. And their favoured alternative is the Canadian dollar, easily outscoring the U.S. dollar, the euro and the Norwegian krona.

Iceland is also in a bind. The country imposed strict currency controls after its spectacular banking collapse in 2008. Foreign-exchange transactions are capped 350,000 kronas (about $3,000). A major downside of those controls is that foreign investors can’t repatriate their profits, making Iceland an unattractive place to do business.

Those capital controls are slated to come off next year. And many experts fear a return to the wild swings of the past -- in inflation, lending rates and the currency itself. Iceland is the smallest country in the world still clinging to its own currency and monetary policy. The krona soared nearly 90 per cent between 2001 and 2007, only to crash 92 per cent after the financial crisis in 2008.

The official government plan is to go to the euro. Iceland has applied to join the European Union and eventually the euro zone. But that’s not looking like a very attractive option these days. And formal entry could take a decade, experts said.

The other options are to peg the krona to another currency, such as the yen, greenback or euro.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
This Geocurrents post outlines the interesting situation of the peculiar Arctic archipelago of Svalbard. Briefly, the islands can be described as almost Norwegian.

Svalbard, about the size of Sri Lanka or Tasmania, is [. . .] notable for its geopolitical anomalies. The coal-rich archipelago came to Norway through the Svalbard Treaty of 1920. The treaty, signed* by the United States, Denmark, France, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden, ostensibly granted Norway “full and absolute sovereignty” over the entire landmass. Svalbard, the Wikipedia stresses, is not a dependency of Norway, but is fully part of the kingdom. In actuality, the situation is more complicated. Norway’s sovereignty over Svalbard is limited and the islands remain legally distinct from the mainland. Norwegian tax laws, for example, do not apply to Svalbard, and immigration rules compromise Norwegian dominion. The 1920 treaty stipulates that residents of all countries are entitled to residency in Svalbard and are granted the right to establish commercial enterprises. In terms of residency potential, the archipelago is something of a global commons.

Several foreign communities have taken advantage of Svalbard’s open borders. The islands have long supported a significant Russian population. A Russian state-owned coal company maintains Svalbard’s second largest settlement, Barentsburg, population 500 or so. Coal mining is no longer very profitable, however, and thus requires heavy subsidies from Moscow. Oddly, Thais form the second largest foreign group. In the 1970s, evidently, a number of local miners took a tropical vacation, several returning with Thai wives. Other citizens of Thailand followed, attracted by Svalbard’s relatively high wages. According to a recent story, the local supermarket “now has an ‘Asian corner’ with rice, chilies, soy and fish sauce and other Thai condiments."

Despite its open-door policy, Svalbard does not present an easy migration option. Bitter winter cold and months of darkness, as well as an average July high temperature of 45 degrees F (7 degrees C), deter would-be immigrants. So too does official policy; welfare is not provided, and anyone without a job and a place to stay can be summarily deported. Svalbard also lacks local democracy. The governor of the archipelago, who also acts as police chief, is appointed by Oslo. Building regulations are extremely strict, and most land is devoted to nature reserves. Other oddities abound, as summarized on a libertarian website whose enthusiasts were eyeing Svalbard as a potential “European Freestate.” According to commentator Joffeloff, “outside the settlements it's illegal to not carry a gun; inside the settlements you had better get it away quickly because then you are suddenly an unaccountable madman, guilty until proven innocent just like on the mainland.” (Guns are to be carried outside of the settlements for protection against bears.)
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I've almost cleared out my backlog.


  • AFP reports that the Inuit are upset that they've not been included as participants in an upcoming conference of Arctic foreign ministers.

  • The Toronto Star announces that despite recent regulations limiting the number of bars in the neighbourhood, Ossington Avenue's art scene is still going.

  • Wired speculates on Google's future in China, everything from full collaboration to exiting the country altogether.

  • This Associated Press article distinguishes between Eurozone countries (like France and Germany) with dynamic and diversified economies, and the PIGS which remain depressed and--at least in Spain's case--might face a lost decade.

  • Europeans are, indeed, starting to wonder how a country could leave the Eurozone (answer: not without financial collapse). The threat may be used to justify a closer fiscal union of the currency bloc.

  • The Turkish president threatened to expel the hundred thousand Armenian migrants estimated to be in Turkey if Armenians continue to push for recognition of the Armenian genocide.

  • Britain, it appears, is being pointed to Canada as an example of what might happen if the country gets a hung parliament (presumably with the Liberal Democrats increasing their share.)

  • Diplomats suggest that Ukraine's President Viktor Yanukovich might have the pull and credibility with Russia and Ukraine's Russophones necessary to move towards the European Union and consolidate the nation-state.

  • Great. Apparently there are entire lakes of methane-producing bacteria) beneath the Antarctic ice, jsut waiting to surface.

  • In Gatineau, the Francophone suburb of ottawa on the Québec side of the Ottawa River, a growing number of immigrants is starting to settle in.

  • Jeff Rubin makes the point that the Canadian dollar is now a petrocurrency, and that this petrocurrency is seriously hurting manufacturing in central Canada and, indeed, most of the rest of the country save Alberta.

  • A Canadian astronomer took a picture of the Soviet Lunokhod-2 unmanned moon rover, on the Moon.

  • Privatize the TTC, one Toronto Life writer asks? Why not?

  • The Pacific Mall, an Asian-themed mall located just north of Toronto, hopes to double its size.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • James Bow reacts to Pat Robertson's evil and highlights the malign consequences of foreign intervention in Haiti.

  • Centauri Dreams announces that, for the first time, astronomers have acquired the spectrum of an extrasolar planet.

  • Daniel Drezner is unimpressed by the Israeli government's humiliation of the Turkish ambassador.

  • Global Sociology writes about the recent anti-immigrant pogrom in the southern Italian town of Rosarno, pointing out that the same immigrants who are so hostile are the same immigrants whose superexploitation makes the town's citrus harvests possible.

  • Hunting Monsters comments on the peculiar powers of the Icelandic president--apparently the office's veto powers were exercised for the first time with the bank settlement.

  • At the MacLean's's website, Paul Wells of Inkless Wells celebrates the fact that the Liberal Party's recent ads attacking the government's proroguing of Parliament is actually an offensive, the first in quite some time.

  • Marginal Revolution observes that Haiti's children are particularly vulnerable.

  • Murdering Mouth points out that, economically speaking, the 1990s saw infinitely more progress than the Aughts.

  • Noel Maurer reacts with surprise at the news that Margaret Thatcher wanted to acquire an island from Indonesia or the Philippines, jointly with Australia, for the resettlement of boat people.

  • Gideon Rachman suggests that ordinary Chinese are sympathizing with Google in its dispute with the Chinese government.

  • Slap Upside the Head observes that Prince Edward Island has finally updated its laws to fully acknowledge same-sex marriage on official documents.

  • The Dragon's Tales links to recent research suggesting that tree growth in a warmer Arctic will accelerate global warming, since their dark colour absorbs heat better than tundra.

  • Torontoist's Cal McLean writes about Toronto's punk scene.

  • Towleroad announces the news that China just had its first public gay wedding.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Over at the National Post, Don Martin recently wrote about how the Mackenzie valley pipeline, something that would transfer natural gas from the fields of the frigid Mackenzie delta south to North American consumers and in so doing jumpstart the local economy, seems to have been dismissed yet again for not the first time in forty years. This time, the federal government is the reluctant partner.

A clearcut slash ripped straight through the boreal forest and entered the Mackenzie River before emerging to disappear into the southern horizon — the prep-work outline for a 1,200-kilometre pathway set to become Canada’s largest-ever construction project.

This is the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline route, connecting the motherlode of Arctic gas deposits in the Beaufort Sea to the northern Alberta gas dissemination network.

But no pipeline equals no pipedream — and the $16-billion megaproject to create another energy frontier and give aboriginal communities an economic lifeline is now apparently dead.

[Minister of the Environment Jim] Prentice was still optimistic about the project just four months ago, talking of signing off on lingering aboriginal claims and getting the sluggish project review committee’s report before securing a federal sign-off for participating in the project.

But unless last week’s priorities committee’s nixing of any federal role in the project is overturned by a full Prime Minister Stephen Harper cabinet, the best, if not only, hope for Arctic and aboriginal economic stimulus is gone.

[. . .]

One top source in Natural Resources raises the ‘I’m not dead yet’ Monty Python skit to suggest there’s lingering life in the project, although that analogy ends badly for the bleating actor, who is quickly put out of his misery by a whack on the head.

Mr. Prentice did emerge on Tuesday to muddy the waters a bit, shrugging it off as a private-sector investment while insisting the “proponents continue to assess the fiscal framework put forward previously by the federal government.”

[. . .]

If, or when, the project dies, shock waves will be felt up and down a Mackenzie Valley where aboriginal enterprise had hoped to buy a one-third stake in the project amid giddy predictions they would eventually pocket annual dividends of more than $100-million.

Huge camps, some sleeping thousands of construction workers, were planned along the route as the pipeline snaked down a booming valley.  

But the risk-sharing role of the federal government, exchanging a taxpayer’s investment of unknown size for a revenue slice linked to the price of natural gas, has been increasingly iffy for years.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Globe and Mail's Doug Saunders this past Saturday wrote about Canada's push to get its Arctic territorial claims recognized.

This new assertiveness has caught European and Russian officials off guard as Ottawa pushes to fend off attempts by other northern powers and the European Union to claim stakes in the Northwest Passage and the open seas of the High Arctic.

While this involves hard diplomacy, such as Canada's leading role in a move to exclude the EU from sitting on the Arctic Council, Mr. Harper's officials have also ordered embassies abroad to mobilize their cultural resources to deliver this policy message, to create a visual image of a fully Arctic Canada.

The stakes are high. Yesterday, Russia released a report arguing that Arctic resources could spark military confrontations, and Canada recently released a major atlas of the Arctic, the result of research intended to back claims of Arctic land ownership under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

"Canada is an Arctic nation and an Arctic power," Foreign Minister Lawrence Cannon told European leaders in Tromso, Norway, at the end of April, while directing his diplomats to adopt an assertive new language around Canada's Arctic possessions. Under his instructions, the new phrase "Arctic power" has begun appearing in communiqués and speeches.

The message for Europe's leaders and citizens is simple and abrupt: The Arctic is not up for grabs. "Through our robust Arctic foreign policy," Mr. Cannon said, "we are affirming our leadership, stewardship and ownership in the region."


Russia, it seems, is Canada's major competitor, although the European Union is also being held at a distance on account of the loudness of Russia's claims and Canada's fear that a European Union voice could overpower Canada's.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
From this Monday's The Globe and Mail comes Steven Chase's article "Military showed little enthusiasm in Arctic sovereignty patrol, report says".

The Canadian Forces have come under fire in an internal report highly critical of military leaders' lack of interest in an Arctic sovereignty protection exercise last August.

Defending Arctic sovereignty is supposed to be a major priority under goals the Harper government set when it took office in February, 2006.

The report on Operation Nanook, obtained by The Globe and Mail under the Access to Information law, was written by a Forces directorate that helped organize the August, 2007, Arctic exercise.

It says Canadian military leaders didn't place a high enough priority on the operation, and it singles out for criticism Canada Command, the military organization given the task of defending this country.

[. . .]

Operation Nanook, which took place between Aug. 7 and 17 last year, is the biggest such annual exercise in the Arctic. Last year's scenarios included intercepting drug smugglers and responding to a ship's oil spill.

The report was critical of the RCMP's V Division in Nunavut for failing to devote sufficient effort to planning and staging the exercise, and blamed the Mounties' "lack of engagement" in part for problems with how things unfolded. Another hindrance was fog.

"Regrettably, V Division of the RCMP, for a number of valid reasons, tends to view ... Nanook as a distraction rather than an opportunity," it said. The report did not explain why the Mounties might lack enthusiasm for Nanook.

An RCMP spokesman blamed lower-than-normal staffing across Nunavut last August. "Human resources levels across the Division were 25 per cent below normal and ongoing operational issues and day-to-day community policing needs took precedence over the exercise," Corporal Greg Cox said.

"Senior RCMP officials were aware of the exercise and co-operated with DND and other exercise officials as much as possible."


Concerns over Canadian sovereignty in Northern Canada, particularly over the famed Northwest Passage, which might become navigable with global warming. The Canadian Encyclopedia provides a reasonably thorough and fair overview of the matter from a Canadian perspective, unlike this 2005 Canadian American Strategic Review paper that goes so far as to build up a Danish order of battle in the case of a Danish claim over, among other potential targets, Ellesmere Island. (Another Cyprus-like affair between Canada and Denmark in the High Arctic might be "interesting" but ... Yeah, right.)

At any rate, Prime Minister Harper had made multiple promises back in 2006 to secure the Arctic for various reasons as described in this 2006 Parliamentary research paper, including national prestige and potentially valuable natural resources. It's perhaps unsprising to see that Canada's own latest willing roi fainéant, content to let the provinces "take as much sovereignty as [they] can swallow", is just as unwilling or unable to do anything positive in the Arctic as in the rest of Canada.
Page generated Jul. 12th, 2025 03:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios