rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Bad Astronomy's Phil Plait reports on the fragility of asteroid Ryugu.

  • Centauri Dreams looks at the JUICE probe, planned to explore the three icy moons of Jupiter.

  • John Quiggin at Crooked Timber reports on the fact that Jimmy Carter was warned in the 1970s about the possibility of global warming.

  • D-Brief notes that the Earth might not be the best world for life, that watery worlds with dense atmospheres and long days might be better.

  • Jessica Poling at the Everyday Sociology Blog writes about the construction of gender.

  • Far Outliers looks at the Nigerian city of Agadez, at one point a sort of port city of the Sahel.

  • Gizmodo asks a variety of experts their opinion on which species is likely to be next in developing our sort of intelligence. (Primates come up frequently, though I like the suggestion of bacterial colonies.)

  • JSTOR Daily looks/a> at the genderless Quaker prophet Publick Universal Friend.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money comments on the interview of Amy Wax with The New Yorker.

  • Marginal Revolution shares the enthusiasm of Tyler Cowen for Warsaw and Poland.

  • Peter Pomerantsev writes at the NYR Daily about how the alt-right has taken to culture-jamming.

  • Starts With A Bang's Ethan Siegel notes the exceptional power of cosmic rays.

  • Window on Eurasia shares the lament of a Chuvash writer about the decline of her people's language.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • 'Nathan Burgoine at Apostrophen links to a giveaway of paranormal LGBT fiction.

  • Bad Astronomer Phil Plait shares some stunning photos of Jupiter provided by Juno.

  • The Broadside Blog's Caitlin Kelly looks at the desperate, multi-state strike of teachers in the United States. American education deserves to have its needs, and its practitioners' needs, met.

  • Centauri Dreams looks at PROCSIMA, a strategy for improving beamed propulsion techniques.

  • Crooked Timber looks at the history of the concept of the uncanny valley. How did the concept get translated in the 1970s from Japan to the wider world?

  • Dangerous Minds shares a 1980s BBC interview with William Burroughs.

  • The Dragon's Tales links to a paper tracing the origin of the Dravidian language family to a point in time 4500 years ago.

  • JSTOR Daily notes Phyllis Wheatley, a freed slave who became the first African-American author in the 18th century but who died in poverty.

  • Language Hat notes the exceptional importance of the Persian language in early modern South Asia.

  • Language Log looks at the forms used by Chinese to express the concepts of NIMBY and NIMBYism.

  • Language Hat notes the exceptional importance of the Persian language in early modern South Asia.

  • The NYR Daily notes that, if the United States junks the nuclear deal with Iran, nothing external to Iran could realistically prevent the country's nuclearization.

  • The Planetary Society Blog looks at the latest findings from the Jupiter system, from that planet's planet-sized moons.

  • Roads and Kingdoms notes that many Rohingya, driven from their homeland, have been forced to work as mules in the illegal drug trade.

  • Starts With A Bang considers how early, based on elemental abundances, life could have arisen after the Big Bang. A date only 1 to 1.5 billion years after the formation of the universe is surprisingly early.

  • Strange Maps' Frank Jacobs notes how the centre of population of different tree populations in the United States has been shifting west as the climate has changed.

  • Understanding Society's Daniel Little takes a look at mechanisms and causal explanations.

  • Worthwhile Canadian Initiative's Frances Woolley takes a look at an ECON 1000 test from the 1950s. What biases, what gaps in knowledge, are revealed by it?

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Centauri Dreams links to archival video painstakingly collected from the Voyager missions.

  • Citizen Science Salon notes ways ordinary people can use satellite imagery for archaeological purposes.

  • Good news: Asian carp can't find a fin-hold in Lake Michigan. Bad news: The lake is so food-deprived nothing lives there. The Crux reports.

  • D-Brief notes that, once every second, a fast radio burst occurs somewhere in the universe.

  • Dangerous Minds looks at the psychedelic retro-futurism of Swedish artist Kilian Eng.

  • Dead Things notes the recovery of ancient human DNA from some African sites, and what this could mean for study.

  • Cody Delistraty reconsiders the idea of the "coming of age" narrative. Does this make sense now that we have abandoned the idea of a unitary self?

  • The Dragon's Gaze links to a paper examining the evolution of icy bodies around different post-main sequence stars.

  • The Great Grey Bridge's Philip Turner notes anti-Putin dissident Alexei Navalny.

  • Hornet Stories notes reports of anti-gay persecution in Azerbaijan.

  • Language Log takes a look at the dialectal variations of southern Ohio.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money starts a discussion about what effective disaster relief for Puerto Rico would look like.

  • The LRB Blog looks at the aftermath of the recent earthquake in Mexico, and the story of the buried girl who was not there.

  • Marginal Revolution notes that Toronto real estate companies, in light of rent control, are switching rental units over to condos.

  • Naked Anthropologist Laura Agustín takes a look at the origins and stories of migrant sex workers.

  • The NYR Daily talks about the supposedly unthinkable idea of nuclear war in the age of Trump.

  • Drew Rowsome gives a strongly positive--and deserved review to the Minmar Gaslight show The Seat Next to the King, a Fringe triumph now playing at the Theatre Centre.

  • Starts With A Bang's Ethan Siegel explains how so many outer-system icy worlds have liquid water.

  • Towleroad features Jim Parsons' exploration of how important is for him, as a gay man, to be married.

  • Window on Eurasia suggests Russian language policy limiting minority languages in education could backfire, and wonders if Islamization one way people in an urbanizing North Caucasus are trying to remain connected to community.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Anthrodendum offers resources for understanding race in the US post-Charlottesville.

  • D-Brief notes that exoplanet WASP-12b is a hot Jupiter that is both super-hot and pitch-black.

  • The Dragon's Gaze links to a paper examining various models of ice-covered worlds and their oceans' habitability.

  • The Everyday Sociology Blog takes a look at the value placed by society on different methods of transport.

  • Far Outliers looks at how Chinese migrants were recruited in the 19th century.

  • Hornet Stories notes that the authorship of famously bad fanfic, "My Immortal", has been claimed, by one Rose Christo.

  • Marginal Revolution notes one explanation for why men are not earning more. (Bad beginnings matter.)

  • Peter Watts has it with facile (and statistically ill-grounded) rhetoric about punching Nazis.

  • At the NYR Daily, Masha Gessen is worried by signs of degeneration in the American body politic.

  • Livejournal's pollotenchegg maps the strength of Ukrainian political divisions in 2006 and 2010.

  • The Power and the Money's Noel Maurer is afraid what AI-enabled propaganda might do to American democracy in the foreseeable future.

  • Roads and Kingdoms notes an enjoyable bagel breakfast at Pondichéry's Auroville Café.

  • Drew Rowsome celebrates the introduction of ultra-low-cost carriers for flyers in Canada.

  • Strange Company notes the 19th century haunting of an English mill.

  • Window on Eurasia notes that Crimean Tatars, and Muslims in Crimea, are facing more repression.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Dragon's Tales linked to Space News' report showing that the ESA is set to join NASA in the ranks of deep-space explorers.

The European Space Agency on Dec. 9 signed a contract with Airbus Defence and Space for the construction of ESA’s Juice – Jupiter Icy Moons – orbiter, scheduled for launch in 2022 aboard a European Ariane 5 rocket.

The contract had been expected since ESA’s July decision to approve a contract valued at 350.8 million euros ($374 million) with Airbus after a competition with Thales Alenia Space of France and Italy and OHB SE of Germany, which had submitted a joint bid.

Francois Auque, head of Airbus Space Systems, said Juice hardware will be produced as early as mid-2016, with the full contracting team from 60 companies lined up by 2017. Some 150 people will be working on the prime contractor’s project team at the program’s peak in 2017-2018, he said.

Juice will spend 7.5 years after launch making its way to the Jupiter system, where it will investigate the Europa, Ganymede and Callisto moons. Its mission is expected to last 3.5 years.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Dragon's Tales links to a paper, "The formation of the Galilean moons and Titan in the Grand Tack scenario", that provides an explanation for why Galilean moons like Ganymede and Callisto lack atmospheres despite being as massive as densely-shrouded Titan. Migration in the early solar system explains this.

In the "Grand Tack" (GT) scenario for the young solar system, Jupiter formed beyond 3.5 AU from the Sun and migrated as close as 1.5 AU until it encountered an orbital resonance with Saturn. Both planets then supposedly migrated outward for several 105 yr, with Jupiter ending up at ~5 AU. The initial conditions of the GT and the timing between Jupiter's migration and the formation of the Galilean satellites remain unexplored. We study the formation of Ganymede and Callisto, both of which consist of ~50% water and rock, respectively, in the GT scenario. We examine why they lack dense atmospheres, while Titan is surrounded by a thick nitrogen envelope. We model an axially symmetric circumplanetary disk (CPD) in hydrostatic equilibrium around Jupiter. The CPD is warmed by viscous heating, Jupiter's luminosity, accretional heating, and the Sun. The position of the water ice line in the CPD, which is crucial for the formation of massive moons, is computed at various solar distances. We assess the loss of Galilean atmospheres due to high-energy radiation from the young Sun. Ganymede and Callisto cannot have accreted their water during Jupiter's supposed GT, because its CPD (if still active) was too warm to host ices and much smaller than Ganymede's contemporary orbit. From a thermal perspective, the Galilean moons might have had significant atmospheres, but these would probably have been eroded during the GT in < 105 yr by solar XUV radiation. Jupiter and the Galilean moons formed beyond 4.5 (+/-0.5) AU and prior to the proposed GT. Thereafter, Jupiter's CPD would have been dry, and delayed accretion of planetesimals should have created water-rich Io and Europa. While Galilean atmospheres would have been lost during the GT, Titan would have formed after Saturn's own tack, because Saturn still accreted substantially for ~106 yr after its closest solar approach, ending up at about 7 AU.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Planetary Society Blog's Emily Lakdawalla noted earlier that JUICE, the proposed European Space Agency unmanned mission to Jupiter and its icy moons that I blogged about last December, has been officially selected and will likely be adopted. This is certainly of note, not only because JUICE is a major expedition that's the European Space Agency's attempt to salvage its part of a joint NASA-ESA mission canceled by the American agency, but because this is the first ESA mission into the outer solar system, to this point an exclusive preserve of NASA.

The Twitterverse is buzzing this morning with news that the Science Programme Committee of the European Space Agency has recommended that the next large European mission be JUICE, a mission to explore the three icy Galilean satellites and eventually to orbit Ganymede. The recommendation is not binding; it must be voted upon (a simple majority vote, according to BBC News), at a meeting of the Science Programme Committee, consisting of representatives of all 19 ESA member states, on May 2. The committee is likely to green-light this recommendation, but it shouldn't be taken as a certain decision just yet.

JUICE is being recommended over ATHENA (an x-ray observatory) and NGO (a gravitational wave observatory). It would launch in June 2022, enter Jupiter orbit in January 2030, and end in Ganymede orbit in June 2033. It is a concept that has been modified from JGO, the Jupiter Ganymede Orbiter, originally conceived as Europe's half of a US-Europe two-spacecraft mission to Jupiter, where NASA had originally proposed to provide a Jupiter Europa Orbiter. NASA canceled its plans to participate in that mission just as it canceled its participation in ExoMars more recently, and as with ExoMars, ESA appears ready to go forward without the USA. In fact, ESA has modified the originally proposed JGO mission to incorporate some of the science goals that would have been accomplished by NASA's Europa mission.

Here's the mission description and profile from the ESA document:

Science goals

The JUICE mission will visit the Jupiter system concentrating on the characterization of Ganymede, Europa and Callisto as planetary objects and potential habitats and on the exploration of the Jupiter system considered as an archetype for gas giants in the solar system and elsewhere. The focus of JUICE is to characterize the conditions that may have led to the emergence of habitable environments among the Jovian icy satellites, with special emphasis on the three ocean-bearing worlds, Ganymede, Europa, and Callisto. The mission will also focus on characterizing the diversity of processes in the Jupiter system which may be required in order to provide a stable environment at Ganymede, Europa and Callisto on geologic time scales, including gravitational coupling between the Galilean satellites and their long term tidal influence on the system as a whole.

Mission profile

The mission will be launched in June 2022 by an Ariane 5 ECA and will perform a 7.5 yr cruise toward Jupiter based on an Earth-Venus-Earth-Earth gravitational assist. The Jupiter orbit insertion will be performed in January 2030, and will be followed by a tour of the Jupiter system, comprising a transfer to Callisto (11 months), a phase studying Europa (with 2 flybys) and Callisto (with 3 flybys) lasting one month, a "Jupiter high-latitude phase" that includes 9 Callisto flybys (lasting 9 months) and the transfer to Ganymede (lasting 11 months). In September 2032 the spacecraft is inserted into orbit around Ganymede, starting with elliptical and high altitude circular orbits (for 5 months) followed by a phase in a medium altitude (500 km) circular orbit (3 months) and by a final phase in low altitude (200 km) circular orbit (1 month). The end of the nominal mission is foreseen in June 2033.


[. . .]

This selection -- if it is accepted -- represents a big win for planetary science and a big loss for space-based astrophysics in Europe. Which is, one can't help but notice, opposite to what the currently-proposed NASA budget represents.

I'm pretty ignorant of the internal and external politics involved in these decisions, and also of the relative merits of JUICE, ATHENA, and NGO, so while I admit I'm happy the planetary mission got selected, I don't feel qualified to comment on whether it should have or shouldn't have been the one that ESA picked. But, as a member of the American public, I can't help but see this decision as Europe stepping in to the sucking vacuum left by NASA in the exploration of the outer planets. NASA's inability to follow up on decades of spectacular successes in outer solar system exploration with any mission beyond Cassini's end in 2017 leaves an opportunity for Europe to take over the leadership of Earth's exploration of the solar system beyond the asteroid belt. It remains a challenge that Europe doesn't currently have the capability to produce radioisotope power sources for spacecraft; limited to solar power at present, that means Europe can't get beyond Jupiter. But Jupiter is far enough, for now.

The outer planets science community is a small and international one, so for sure there will be American participation in the science team, and probably also in the payload; the ESA document says specifically that "NASA has expressed an interest in contributing to the payload." Science instruments on ESA missions work differently from NASA. They aren't paid for by ESA; ESA builds and pays for the spacecraft, but different member states propose, build, and operate the science instruments using their own funds. ESA estimates that the spacecraft will cost €830 million and that ESA member states will spend an estimated €241 million to build instruments. NASA may contribute up to €68 million toward the payload. I hope it contributes the full amount; it'd be hard to imagine a way to get more bang for one's bucks than to pay for a couple of instruments and 10 or 20 scientists to work on a mission being built, developed, launched, and operated by someone else.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Callisto, outermost of second-largest of four Jupiter's planet-sized moons, has been neglected. Even though it's a huge complex world very nearly the size of Mercury, it's neglected in favour of more spectacular moons elsewhere in the Jupiter system--volcanic Io, Europa with its oceans and possible life, even near-twin Ganymede with its grooved terrain--or other planet's moons like Saturn's atmosphere-laden Titan. It's even neglected in science fiction. When Jupiter is stellified at the end of Arthur C. Clarke's 2010--I blogged about the likely consequences of the stellification in January here--it's Ganymede that gets warmed into habitability, while Callisto is still a boring wasteland. Callisto's marked as a dead world, hence an uninteresting one.

Douglas Muir has stepped up to Callisto's defense. It's interesting, too, with its own evolutionary processes and mysteries! (Is it for certain it doesn't have a subsurface ocean, though?)

First, let's get the painfully obvious stuff out of the way: yes, Callisto is a bit on the bland side. It doesn't have an atmosphere, like Titan. It doesn' have volcanoes, like Io, or geysers, like Enceladus. It probably doesn't have a huge internal ocean of water like Europa. It's not part of a "double planet" like Charon. It doesn't have a magnetic field, like Ganymede. It's just a large, icy moon with a heavily cratered surface. So, yes, you could say that Callisto is less interesting than some other places.
Except that you'd be stupid to say that, because Callisto is actually pretty damn interesting.

Let's start with the most common misconception, which is that Callisto is "geologically dead". We're told that its surface is "saturated" with craters, so that any new crater would obliterate one or more old ones. Craters, nothing but craters. Right?

Wrong. Much of Callisto's surface is -- wait for it -- eroded. Yes, it's full of craters, but there are vast regions where the craters have been degraded to the point where you can hardly recognize them. All that's left are smooth, undulating basins with lumps or spires in the middle.

What's causing the erosion? Well, take a moment to consider how odd Callisto actually is. It's a large icy world that's relatively warm -- daytime surface temperatures get up to around 160 Kelvin, or about -170 Fahrenheit, and can peak at another 10 K higher than that at noon on the equator. That's actually pretty toasty for an ice moon. The other moons of Jupiter are all 30 or 40 degrees cooler than that. Callisto is warmer because it's dark -- it has a really low albedo. (Why? We're not sure. One guess is that radiolysis has broken down organic compounds, leaving a sooty residue.) Whatever the reason, Callisto is the warmest large icy body in the Solar System.

So Callisto gets warm enough that water ice can sublime. That's very different from, say, someplace like Titan. At Titan's 95 K, water ice is completely inert, dead as granite. But at 160 K? Water can actually have a vapor pressure. A very tiny vapor pressure, to be sure. But over geological time, many millions of years, water ice will slowly sublime away into the vacuum. The sharp edges of craters will gradually blur and then slump. Much of the vapor is lost to space, but some condenses as bright, reflective frost. That's what we're seeing when we look at Callisto... mostly dark stuff, but with gleaming shiny bright bits. So if you could walk around the surface of Callisto, it wouldn't look much like Earth's Moon, all gravel and sharp edges. Instead, most features would be rounded and soft-edged.

[. . .]

You'll still see a lot of people saying that Callisto's surface is "old", "ancient", or even "pristine". No. Even at the macro level, all those big craters have been softened by erosion, and the composition of the surface has been dramatically changed by radiolysis and the movement of volatiles. It's like the difference between a bright new shiny penny, and one that's old, worn down, and tarnished. And at the micro level, the scale of a human walking around, Callisto's surface has been completely transformed. It's not old at all.

And it's probably still evolving. Callisto's surface is being shaped by subtle, slow processes -- sublimation, condensation, radiolysis -- working over geologic time. These things aren't flashy. But they get results, and they're just as interesting as the faster and more blatant processes taking place on Io or Titan.


Go, read the post and the comments.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Shifting from the too-mundane realm of Canadian politics to the wonders of the universe beyond Earth, Centauri Dreams reports on the ongoing debate about Titan and its geological (titanological?) activity. Is it an active world, with ice volcanoes? Or, is it a basically dead world, with only the atmosphere distinguishing it from Jupiter's Callisto?

Back in December, scientists from the Cassini team presented evidence for ice volcanoes on Titan, looking at a region called Sotra Facula, which bears some resemblance to volcanoes on Earth like Mt. Etna in Italy and Laki in Iceland. An ice volcano, also known as a cryovolcano, would draw on geological activity beneath the surface that warms and melts parts of the interior and sends icy materials through a surface opening. Sotra Facula’s two 1000-meter peaks combine what appear to be deep volcanic craters with finger-like flows of material, a kind of surface sculpting that could explain some of the processes occurring on other ice-rich moons.

But work like this is part of an ongoing dialogue testing various hypotheses, and the latest round takes us in a sharply different direction. In a new paper in Icarus, Jeff Moore (NASA Ames) and Robert Pappalardo (JPL) argue that Titan is in fact much less geologically active than some have thought. A cool and dormant interior would be incapable of producing active ice volcanoes:

“It would be fantastic to find strong evidence that clearly shows Titan has an internal heat source that causes ice volcanoes and lava flows to form,” adds Moore. “But we find that the evidence presented to date is unconvincing, and recent studies of Titan’s interior conducted by geophysicists and gravity experts also weaken the possibility of volcanoes there.”


The new work looks at Titan in light of what we see on Callisto, which Moore sees as analogous to Titan ‘if Callisto had weather.’ And indeed, the two moons are roughly the same size, with Callisto’s cratered surface solely the result of impact events rather than internal heating. In the new paper, Moore and Pappalardo see Titan’s surface as explicable entirely from external processes like wind, rain and impacts. These we see in profusion — lakes of liquid methane and ethane, valleys carved by rivers, craters — through infrared and radar instrumentation, but the debate now moves to whether all surface features can be explained in the same way.

Titan’s atmosphere may remain the focus of debate between those who believe the moon is geologically dormant and the ice volcano theorists. The atmosphere is primarily nitrogen, with a few percent methane, and the Sotra Facula analysis, presented at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco last December, focused partially on that mix. Thus Linda Spilker (JPL):

“Cryovolcanoes help explain the geological forces sculpting some of these exotic places in our solar system. At Titan, for instance, they explain how methane can be continually replenished in the atmosphere when the sun is constantly breaking that molecule down.”


Myself, I'd love Titan to be geologically active, but that's just my prejudice. As the first commenter said, we need another and better Titan probe to settle this.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I've blogged in my past about my fascination with Ceres, the first asteroid discovered by astronomers, for decades considered a planet, and most recently reclassified (along with Pluto) as a dwarf planet. Another asteroid is dear to my heart, a geologically interesting body that also has its own claim to dwarf planet status, Vesta.

The discovery of Ceres in 1801 and Pallas in 1802 led German astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers to propose that the two objects were the remnants of a destroyed planet. In 1802 he sent a letter with his proposal to the English astronomer William Herschel, suggesting that a search near the locations where the orbits of Ceres and Pallas intersected might reveal more fragments. These orbital intersections were located in the constellations of Cetus and Virgo.[14]

Olbers commenced his search in 1802, and on March 29, 1807 he coincidentally discovered Vesta in the constellation Virgo. As the asteroid Juno had been discovered in 1804, this made Vesta the fourth object to be identified in the region that is now known as the main asteroid belt. This discovery was announced in a letter addressed to German astronomer Johann H. Schröter dated March 31. Olbers allowed the prominent mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss to name the asteroid after the Roman virgin goddess of home and hearth, Vesta.


Vesta ended up losing its planetary status later in the 19th century, as the discovery of hundreds of other asteroids scattered in what came to be known as the asteroid belt led to the downgrading of these bodies. I think that this downgrading was a mistake in some respects, in that even the larger asteroids, like the larger moons of the outer Solar System (the four Galilean moons and Titan, called "secondary planets" also in the 19th century), weren't considered to be worlds of the same import as the "actually existing" planets. We have sent space probes out to distant Neptune, but nothing to the Ceres and Vesta discovered more than a generation before Neptune.

This, thankfully, is changing. Bad Astronomy linked to these superb NASA images of the Vesta surface, part of an ongoing effort to map first Vesta then Ceres for the benefit of the navigators of the Dawn space proibe, scheduled to visit Vesta in 2011 and Ceres in 2015.

Vesta from four angles

Vesta is a very unusual asteroid, and the key to understanding its unusual nature lies in its density. This rocky world can claim a density of 3.42 grams per cubic centimetre. This is substantially above the estimated density of ~2.07 grams per cubic centimetre estimated for Ceres, almost exactly the same as the 3.34 grams per cubic centimetre of Moon, and not that far removed from Mars' 3.93 grams per cubic centimetre. Even though Vesta is a very small body, estimated to have a diameter of 550 kilometers and a polar axis 462 km, and with a surface gravity a bit more than two percent of Earth's, Vesta is a dense, rocky body. It's unique in having a rocky surface, perhaps similar in composition to the maria of the Moon, that's so reflective that Vesta is the only asteroid visible to the naked eye. The asteroid--the only surviving member of its class--formed as particles collided and condensed over several million years, internal heat produced by the decay of a radioactive isotope of aluminum common in the early Solar System, this melting resulting in a sorting out of Vesta's material by density before the too-small world began to cool.

Vesta's complex surface is marked by one very, very big crater discoveredd in 1997.

The most prominent surface feature is an enormous crater 460 kilometres in diameter centered near the south pole. Its width is 80% of the entire diameter of Vesta. The floor of this crater is about 13 kilometres below, and its rim rises 4–12 km above the surrounding terrain, with total surface relief of about 25 km. A central peak rises 18 kilometres above the crater floor. It is estimated that the impact responsible excavated about 1% of the entire volume of Vesta, and it is likely that the Vesta family and V-type asteroids are the products of this collision. [. . .] Spectroscopic analyses of the Hubble images have shown that this crater has penetrated deep through several distinct layers of the crust, and possibly into the mantle, as indicated by spectral signatures of olivine.

Several other large craters about 150 kilometres wide and 7 kilometres deep are also present. A dark albedo feature about 200 kilometres across has been named Olbers in honour of Vesta's discoverer, but it does not appear in elevation maps as a fresh crater would. Its nature is presently unknown; it may be an old basaltic surface. It serves as a reference point with the 0° longitude prime meridian defined to pass through its center.

The eastern and western hemispheres show markedly different terrains. From preliminary spectral analyses of the Hubble Space Telescope images, the eastern hemisphere appears to be some kind of high albedo, heavily cratered "highland" terrain with aged regolith, and craters probing into deeper plutonic layers of the crust. On the other hand, large regions of the western hemisphere are taken up by dark geologic units thought to be surface basalts, perhaps analogous to the lunar maria.


The large south-polar crater--visible in the two top images--may be the scar produced by a collision that ejected perhaps one percent of its mass via at least one massive impact a billion years ago, creating a signifcant family of asteroids was thrown off of the Vestan surface by this and other impacts.

Could Vesta be elevated to the status of a dwarf planet? Maybe. The infamous International Astronomical Union resolution defines planets as bodies massive enough to pull themselves into spherical shapes through their own gravity. Vesta isn't a sphere, perhaps a result of that collision, and it has only a quarter the mass of the already small Ceres. If Dawn determines that Vesta is massive enough to mold itself into a sphere, and if it turns out that Vesta's oblateness is productive of the aforementioned massive asteroid collision, Vesta could join Ceres in that elite club.

Age of miracles and wonders.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Bad Astronomy's Phil Plait lets us know that T Pyxidis, a recurring nova star that might go supernova, isn't nearly close enough to kill us all.

  • Global Sociology examines the very serious impact of the telenovela on all elements of popular culture but wonders how relevant it is to the North American soap opera experience.

  • To commemorate Galileo's discovery of Jupiter's four planet-sized moons, Johnny Pez linked to four classic science-fiction short stories, each one set on a different moon. He also reports on the 1930s' race to ascend into the stratosphere.

  • Marginal Revolution reports on a study of housing in India that suggests majority communities will respond more favourably to religious minorities if there's little residential segregation.

  • Slap Upside the Head reports ona questionable Calgary Stampede marketing survey that asks respondents some homophobic questions.

  • Spacing Toronto looks at Thistledown, a community long since assimilated into Toronto by the city's growth.

  • Window on Eurasia considers whether Bonapartism--militarized and populist, but centralized and modernizing, on the model of Napoleon III--might be in Russia's future.

rfmcdonald: (Default)


I have to thank 80 Beats for their blog post "400 Years After Galileo Spotted Them, the Moons of Jupiter Are Looking Fly", and for this image showing the four Galilean moons--Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto--against their parent body of Jupiter.

On January 7, 1610, Galileo Galilei pointed his “spyglass” to the heavens and stared up at Jupiter, one of the brightest lights in the evening sky, and noted what he at first assumed to be three bright stars near the planet. But over the following nights, he realized that those three bright bodies weren’t fixed in the heavens like stars, but rather seemed to dance around Jupiter along with a fourth, smaller body.

Galileo triumphantly announced his discovery of four “planets” that revolved around Jupiter in his March treatise, Starry Messenger [pdf]. Thinking of his pocketbook, he dutifully proposed naming them the Medicean Stars in honor of his patron, Cosimo de Medici. But the name didn’t stick, and today we honor the scientist rather than the patron by calling Jupiter’s four largest satellites the Galilean moons.

The discovery dealt a death blow to the Ptolemaic understanding of the universe, in which all planets and stars were believed to orbit the Earth. For, as Galileo wrote in his treatise, “our own eyes show us four stars which wander around Jupiter as does the moon around the earth.”

In the 400 years that have passed since Galileo first laid eyes on them, we’ve learned a great deal about the moons Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto (all named after the mythological paramours of Jupiter). If all goes according to plan we’ll soon get to know them much more intimately–NASA and the European Space Agency are currently planning missions to closely observe three of the moons.
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios