rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Ryan Anderson at anthro{dendum} looks at the unnatural history of the beach in California, here.

  • Architectuul looks at the architectural imaginings of Iraqi Shero Bahradar, here.

  • Bad Astronomy looks at gas-rich galaxy NGC 3242.

  • James Bow announces his new novel The Night Girl, an urban fantasy set in an alternate Toronto with an author panel discussion scheduled for the Lillian H. Smith Library on the 28th.

  • Centauri Dreams looks at the indirect evidence for an exomoon orbiting WASP-49b, a possible Io analogue detected through its ejected sodium.

  • Crooked Timber considers the plight of holders of foreign passports in the UK after Brexit.

  • The Crux notes that astronomers are still debating the nature of galaxy GC1052-DF2, oddly lacking in dark matter.

  • D-Brief notes how, in different scientific fields, the deaths of prominent scientists can help progress.

  • Bruce Dorminey notes how NASA and the ESA are considering sample-return missions to Ceres.

  • Andrew LePage at Drew Ex Machina looks at the first test flights of the NASA Mercury program.

  • The Dragon's Tales looks at how Japan is considering building ASAT weapons.

  • Andrew LePage at Drew Ex Machina looks at the first test flights of the NASA Mercury program.

  • Far Outliers looks how the anti-malarial drug quinine played a key role in allowing Europeans to survive Africa.

  • At In Media Res, Russell Arben Fox considers grace and climate change.

  • io9 reports on how Jonathan Frakes had anxiety attacks over his return as Riker on Star Trek: Picard.

  • JSTOR Daily reports on the threatened banana.

  • Language Log looks at the language of Hong Kong protesters.

  • Erik Loomis at Lawyers, Guns and Money notes how a new version of The Last of the Mohicans perpetuates Native American erasure.

  • Marginal Revolution notes how East Germany remains alienated.

  • Neuroskeptic looks at the participant-observer effect in fMRI subjects.

  • The NYR Daily reports on a documentary looking at the India of Modi.

  • Corey S. Powell writes at Out There about Neptune.

  • The Planetary Society Blog examines the atmosphere of Venus, something almost literally oceanic in its nature.

  • Noel Maurer at The Power and the Money considers how Greenland might be incorporated into the United States.

  • Rocky Planet notes how Earth is unique down to the level of its component minerals.

  • The Russian Demographics Blog considers biopolitical conservatism in Poland and Russia.

  • Starts With a Bang's Ethan Siegel considers if LIGO has made a detection that might reveal the nonexistence of the theorized mass gap between neutron stars and black holes.

  • Frank Jacobs at Strange Maps looks at Marchetti's constant: People in cities, it seems, simply do not want to commute for a time longer than half an hour.

  • Understanding Society's Daniel Little looks at how the US Chemical Safety Board works.

  • Window on Eurasia reports on how Muslims in the Russian Far North fare.

  • Arnold Zwicky looks at cannons and canons.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Bad Astronomer Phil Plait shares beautiful images of nebula Sharpless 2-29, brilliant and beautiful from the heart of our galaxy.

  • Centauri Dreams notes how New Horizons is maneuvering for its rendezvous with KBO MU69 on 1 January 2019.

  • Daily JSTOR notes how Indian schools were at once vehicles for the assimilation of American indigenous peoples and also sites for potential resistance.

  • Dangerous Minds shares the vintage Vampirella art of Enrique Torres-Prat.

  • From Tumblr, Explain It Like I'm Not From Lawrence looks at a very unusual tower in the downtown of that Kansas community.

  • Hornet Stories notes that PrEP is becoming available in Brazil, but only for a small subset of potential users.

  • Imageo notes a recent American study observing that the degree of Arctic heating is in at least two millennia.

  • Joe. My. God. notes that Bermuda has repealed marriage equality. I can't help but think this will not help the island's tourism.

  • Language Hat links to a new encyclopedia article examining the origins of the Japanese language. I'm surprised the article suggests there are no verifiable links to Korean, Paekche aside.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money has an after-action report on the Alabama senate election. I agree with most of the conclusions--certainly it shows a need to contest every election!

  • Allan Metcalf at Lingua Franca quite likes the term "fake news" for its specific power, claiming it as his word of 2017.

  • The NYR Daily reflects on an exhibition of the powerful works of Modigliani.

  • The Planetary Society Blog reports on some infrared images taken by Juno of Jupiter and volcanic Io.

  • Roads and Kingdoms shares 21 pieces of advice for people interested in visiting Iran as tourists.

  • Towleroad's list of the Top 10 albums of 2017 is worth paying attention to.

  • If this Window on Eurasia report is correct and HIV seroprevalence in Russia is twice the proportion officially claimed, 1.5% of the population ...

rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Dragon's Tales links to a paper, "The formation of the Galilean moons and Titan in the Grand Tack scenario", that provides an explanation for why Galilean moons like Ganymede and Callisto lack atmospheres despite being as massive as densely-shrouded Titan. Migration in the early solar system explains this.

In the "Grand Tack" (GT) scenario for the young solar system, Jupiter formed beyond 3.5 AU from the Sun and migrated as close as 1.5 AU until it encountered an orbital resonance with Saturn. Both planets then supposedly migrated outward for several 105 yr, with Jupiter ending up at ~5 AU. The initial conditions of the GT and the timing between Jupiter's migration and the formation of the Galilean satellites remain unexplored. We study the formation of Ganymede and Callisto, both of which consist of ~50% water and rock, respectively, in the GT scenario. We examine why they lack dense atmospheres, while Titan is surrounded by a thick nitrogen envelope. We model an axially symmetric circumplanetary disk (CPD) in hydrostatic equilibrium around Jupiter. The CPD is warmed by viscous heating, Jupiter's luminosity, accretional heating, and the Sun. The position of the water ice line in the CPD, which is crucial for the formation of massive moons, is computed at various solar distances. We assess the loss of Galilean atmospheres due to high-energy radiation from the young Sun. Ganymede and Callisto cannot have accreted their water during Jupiter's supposed GT, because its CPD (if still active) was too warm to host ices and much smaller than Ganymede's contemporary orbit. From a thermal perspective, the Galilean moons might have had significant atmospheres, but these would probably have been eroded during the GT in < 105 yr by solar XUV radiation. Jupiter and the Galilean moons formed beyond 4.5 (+/-0.5) AU and prior to the proposed GT. Thereafter, Jupiter's CPD would have been dry, and delayed accretion of planetesimals should have created water-rich Io and Europa. While Galilean atmospheres would have been lost during the GT, Titan would have formed after Saturn's own tack, because Saturn still accreted substantially for ~106 yr after its closest solar approach, ending up at about 7 AU.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Centauri Dreams reports on an ingenious proposal for a sample-return mission to Jupiter's moons of Europa and Io.

  • Crooked Timber is critical of George Packer's criticism of Wikileaks et al.

  • The Dragon's Gaze reports on the discovery of giant planets orbiting non-main sequence giant stars.

  • The Dragon's Tales links to a news report of a symposium on the Russian economy. Can state banks substitute for foreign investors, and should they?

  • Amitai Etzioni comes out in favour of exploration and colonization of the oceans.

  • Far Outliers recounts a Japanese massacre of civilians in Papua New Guinea in the Second World War.

  • The Financial Times' The World blog doesn't think the European Parliament's candidate for that body's presidency should be accepted.

  • The point is made at Lawyers, Guns and Money that "friendzone" is terrible not least because it reduces all relationships with women to sex.

  • Torontoist notes that if the Liberals won the Ontario election they'd give lots of nice things to Toronto, but can the province afford it?

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • The Big Picture shares photos of young Russian military cadets training.

  • blogTO has a transcript of one of Ford's most recent reported rants.

  • Centauri Dreams and D-Brief both note that the giant exoplanet Beta Pictoris b apparently has an eight-hour day.

  • Crooked Timber's John Quiggin, focusing on Australia, discusses right-wing tribalism.

  • The Dragon's Gaze links to a paper examining various possibilities for orbits of planets in the Gliese 581 system.
  • The Dragon's Tales links to a proposal (with pictures) for a Io volcano observer space probe.

  • Eastern Approaches notes the continuing deterioration of eastern Ukraine.

  • Geocurrents' Martin Lewis comments on the geographical illiteracy of the United States and of a very bad Pakistani school atlas.

  • Joe. My. God. notes that, today, Brunei is implementing full sharia law.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money notes an Australian proposal to outlaw civil society-led boycotts.
  • Marginal Revolution links to a poll suggesting Americans don't care about income inequality.

  • The Planetary Society Weblog's Emily Lakdawalla notes that we're getting closer to figuring out which Kuiper belt dwarf planet is larger, Pluto or Eris.

  • The Tin Man explains why he prefers Twitter to Facebook. (The former feels more free-form, less of a gated community.)

  • Window on Eurasia notes that responsibility for recent increases in birth rates in Russia can't be assigned entirely, or even mostly, to the Russian government.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Universe Today's Nancy Atkinson writes about a minor mystery involving patterns of volcanism on Jupiter's innermost major moon, Io.

“Rigorous statistical analysis of the distribution of volcanoes in the new global geologic map of Io,” said Christopher Hamilton of the University of Maryland, College Park and the Goddard Spaceflight Center. “We found a systematic eastward offset between observed and predicted volcano locations that can’t be reconciled with any existing solid body tidal heating models.”

Io’s internal heat is created by the tidal forces inflicted from the giant planet Jupiter on one side and from two neighboring moons that orbit further from Jupiter – Europa and Ganymede on the other.

Researchers say there are questions about how this tidal heating affects the moon’s interior. Some propose it heats up the deep interior, but the prevailing view is that most of the heating occurs within a relatively shallow layer under the crust, called the asthenosphere. The asthenosphere is where rock behaves like putty, slowly deforming under heat and pressure.

“Our analysis supports the prevailing view that most of the heat is generated in the asthenosphere, but we found that volcanic activity is located 30 to 60 degrees East from where we expect it to be,” said Hamilton.

On Earth, a simple explanation how volcanoes are created is that when tectonic plates shift in such a way, the subsurface magma is able to flow onto the surface. On Io, the tidal forces from Jupiter actually force Io’s surface to bulge up and down by as much as 100 m, causing magma to flow continuously.

[. . .]

Possibilities to explain the offset include a faster than expected rotation for Io, an interior structure that permits magma to travel significant distances from where the most heating occurs to the points where it is able erupt on the surface, or a missing component in existing tidal heating models, like fluid tides from an underground magma ocean, according to the team.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Universe Today's Nancy Atkinson reported on the latest findings from Europa. In a paper available online, a pair of astronomers report on evidence not only about Europa's ocean, but about the possible contents of the ocean and the ocean's indirect interactions with the local neighbourhood. Sulfur ejected from Io's volcanoes might be present. The impact of this on the ocean's potential habitability is open to question.

Astronomer Mike Brown and his colleague Kevin Hand might be suffering from “Pump Handle Phobia,” as radio personality Garrison Keillor calls it, where those afflicted just can’t resist putting their tongues on something frozen to see if it will stick. But Brown and Hand are doing it all in the name of science, and they may have found the best evidence yet that Europa has a liquid water ocean beneath its icy surface. Better yet, that vast subsurface ocean may actually shoot up to Europa’s surface, on occasion.

[. . .]

“We now have evidence that Europa’s ocean is not isolated—that the ocean and the surface talk to each other and exchange chemicals,” said Brown, who is an astronomer and professor of planetary astronomy at Caltech. “That means that energy might be going into the ocean, which is important in terms of the possibilities for life there. It also means that if you’d like to know what’s in the ocean, you can just go to the surface and scrape some off.”

“The surface ice is providing us a window into that potentially habitable ocean below,” said Hand, deputy chief scientist for solar system exploration at JPL.

[. . .]

Salts were detected in the Galileo data – “Not ‘salt’ as in the sodium chloride of your table salt,” Brown wrote in his blog, “Mike Brown’s Planets,” “but more generically ‘salts’ as in ‘things that dissolve in water and stick around when the water evaporates.’”

[. . . N]ow, with data from the Keck Observatory, Brown and Hand have identified a spectroscopic feature on Europa’s surface that indicates the presence of a magnesium sulfate salt, a mineral called epsomite, that could have formed by oxidation of a mineral likely originating from the ocean below.

[. . .]

The magnesium sulfate appears to be generated by the irradiation of sulfur ejected from the Jovian moon Io and, the authors deduce, magnesium chloride salt originating from Europa’s ocean. Chlorides such as sodium and potassium chlorides, which are expected to be on the Europa surface, are in general not detectable because they have no clear infrared spectral features. But magnesium sulfate is detectable. The authors believe the composition of Europa’s ocean may closely resemble the salty ocean of Earth.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I think that io9 may have overreached in titling a post. The post "Why we won’t find Earth-2 around a red dwarf star" links to a very interesting paper regarding unconsidered problems facing potentially Earth-like planets around red dwarf stars, "Tidal Venuses: Triggering a Climate Catastrophe via Tidal Heating" by Barnes, Mullins, et al., but the paper consider a specific known exoplanet orbiting a red dwarf--Gliese 667C c, covered by me back in February here--and concludes that it could be habitable after all.

What's going on? It all has to do with the habitable zones around stars, the set of orbits in which a planet could plausibly support an Earth-like climate friendly to liquid water. Traditional calculations of a habitable zone have considered the radiant energy produced by a star. For red dwarfs--dim, low mass stars--a planet in the habitable zone would be closely bound by gravitation to its star, quite possibly with one side forever facing its sun in much the same way that one side of the Moon forever faces the Earth and the other forever faces away. This degree of tidal locking wouldn't prevent such a planet from being habitable, as atmospheric models suggest that an atmosphere only slightly denser than Mars would be capable of transporting enough heat to prevent the planet's atmosphere from freezing on the dark side. Other constraints, however, might exist. The authors identify the heat produced by the gravitational tides exerted by a star on such a close planet as a major source of heat.

As a planet moves from periastron, its closest approach to the star, to apoastron, the furthest point, and back again, the gravitational force changes, being inversely proportional to distance squared. This difference creates an oscillating strain on the planet that causes it to undergo periodic deformation. The rigidity of the planet resists the deformation, and friction generates heat. This energy production is called tidal heating.

Tidal heating is responsible for the volcanism on Io (Strom et al. 1979; Laver et al. 2007), which was predicted, using tidal theory, by Peale et al. (1979). Io is a small body orbiting Jupiter with an eccentricity of 0.0041, which is maintained by the gravitational perturbations of its fellow Galilean moons, that shows global volcanism which resurfaces the planet on a timescale of 100 – 105 years (Johnson et al. 4 1979; Blaney et al. 1995; McEwen et al. 2004). The masses of Jupiter and Io are orders of magnitude smaller than a star and terrestrial exoplanet, and thus the latter have a much larger reservoir of orbital and rotational energy available for tidal heating. Moreover, some exoplanets have been found with orbital eccentricities larger than 0.9 (Naef et al. 2001; Jones et al. 2006; Tamuz et al. 2008). Thus, the tidal heating of terrestrial exoplanets may be much more effective than on Io (Jackson et al. 2008c,a; Barnes et al. 2009a, 2010; Heller et al. 2011). This expectation led to the proposition that terrestrial exoplanets with surface heat fluxes as large or larger than Io’s should be classified as “Super-Ios”, rather than “Super-Earths” (Barnes et al. 2009b).


The authors go on to calculate that it's quite possible for some planets closely orbiting red dwarf stars, especially worlds orbiting low-mass red dwarf stars (less than 20% the mass of our sun, perhaps) and worlds with very eccentric orbits, to be located within the "classical" habitable zone of their star but nonetheless be so heated by the tidal forces exerted by their star as to become "Tidal Venuses", becoming superheated worlds which lose their water to evaporation in space in just hundreds of millions of years. The aforementioned Gliese 667C c is not likely to be such a planet, according to the team's calculations, as its orbit is too distant. Other worlds, as yet undiscovered, may not be so lucky.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
The Wired Science article "Titan: A Wet World Not Far From Earth", by Adam Mann, makes very interesting classifications.

Though Saturn's largest moon, Titan, is a small, cold world orbiting on the outskirts of the solar system, it actually boasts many familiar features.

“Titan is fascinating because it has some surprising properties so similar to Earth,” said planetary scientist Oded Aharonson from the California Institute of Technology. “It has a liquid which erodes channels, an atmosphere, a hydrologic cycle, and many other parallels.”

Chief among Titan’s interesting qualities is that it's the only body other than Earth where liquids are known to flow in large concentrations on the surface. Because average temperatures there are -300 degrees Fahrenheit, these liquids are not water. Instead, hydrocarbons such as methane and ethane rain down from clouds, course over the landscape in rivers and eventually pour out into large lakes and seas.

The presence of liquids has sparked scientists’ imaginations. If Titan has so many Earth-like features, perhaps it possesses one more terrestrial trait: the presence of life. Native organisms on Titan would be an incredible discovery, showing that life may have formed more than once and suggesting it's common in the universe.


The below map of Ligeia Mare, a Titanian hydrocarbon sea with a greater surface area than Lake Superior, illustrates the article.



Is Titan Earth-like? Well, let's say that Titan is exactly Earth-like save in the many, many ways in which Titan is completely different. It's an outer-system moon with a mass one percent or so that of the Earth, with a surface temperature hundreds of degrees cooler than the Earth, an atmosphere substantially denser than the Earth's and composed almost entirely of nitrogen (no oxygen there), and possessing a hydrologic cycle dominated by liquid hydrocarbons, not liquid water. The suggestively Earth-like lake above is the product of the action of eons of hydrocarbon liquid erosion of a cryogenic Titanian surface made of a mixture of rock and ice, a surface apparently tectonically inactive and perhaps as much shaped by impacts as by indigenous activity. If Titan was ever warmed to Earth-like temperatures, its cryogenic atmosphere and hydrosphere would quickly evaporate, heated to the point that it could escape the world's meager gravitational pull in a few millions of years, at most. In this very non-Earth-like environment, life on Titan would be plausibly very different from life on Earth, shaped by the world's very low temperatures and perhaps using liquid hydrocarbons instead of water as its solvent of choice.

Mars has a much more Earth-like climate, one that--at most hospitable--barely overlaps with the least hospitable extremes of Earth, may have possessed (still possess?) a hydrologic cycle predicated on water, certainly possesses a rocky surface with minimal levels of tectonic activity and clear evidence of having been worked by water, and even offers the potential for secure habitats for recognizably Earth-like life. Venus' superhot and superdense carbon dioxide atmosphere does not support water anywhere near the planetary surface, but the world did support water oceans in its cooler youth while tectonic activity in forms broadly familiar to those on Earth occurs (planetary resurfacings instead of plate tectonics, but volcanoes and quakes do occur). Critically, both worlds plausibly supported very broadly Earth-like conditions for--perhaps--billions of years.

Titan's a fascinating, complex world, deserving of attention. I wonder, though, how useful it is to identify certain of its characteristics as especially Earth-like when in most respects Titan is more different from Earth than at least two other solar system worlds, its similarities being mostly involving superficial resemblances between very different realities. If Titan is Earth-like, what about high-density and rocky Mercury? Or the very tectonically active Io? Or moons like Europa and Enceladus which plausibly have tectonic activity heating subsurface water oceans? Allowing the category of "Earth-like" to be too broad risks emptying the category of meaning.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Richard Lovett at National Geographic News is one of the many sources to comment on the discovery of massive amounts of lava beneath the crust of Jupiter's innermost major moon Io.

Only slightly larger than Earth's moon, Io is the most volcanically active body in the solar system. The discovery solves a long-standing debate over how much of the moon's insides must be molten to feed the ongoing eruptions.

"At any time, Io has 400 [and] maybe more active volcanoes," said study leader Krishan Khurana, a planetary physicist at the University of California, Los Angles.

"They are very powerful—they can shoot plumes out into space to a height of about 300 miles [500 kilometers]." Finding an extensive magma ocean means that "now we know why there are so many, and where the lava comes from."

[. . .]

Khurana and colleagues made the find after reexamining readings from the Galileo spacecraft, which orbited Jupiter from 1995 to 2003 and made occasional flybys of the planet's moons, including Io.

The data showed how Io deflects Jupiter's enormous magnetic field via a process called electromagnetic induction—"very similar to the principle used by the metal detectors at the airport," Khurana said.

Magma has high electrical conductivity, he explained, a trait that laboratory studies have demonstrated with molten rocks similar to those expected to lie beneath Io's surface.

As Jupiter's electromagnetic field penetrates Io, it interacts with the magma ocean, and a current forms on the outer edge of the molten rock layer. This current in turn generates its own electromagnetic waves, which deflect Jupiter's field lines, an effect the Galileo probe was able to detect.

The data show that Io's magma exists in an underground layer that lies about [30 to 50 kilometers] beneath the surface, between the crust and the mantle.

The magma layer is at least [50 kilometers] thick, and it might be as thick as [320 kilometers].


The magma, likely with the consistency of slushy ice (a mix of molten rock and crystals), was created by tidal forces produced by Jupiter, this magma ocean in turn generating tidal energy through friction.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Callisto, outermost of second-largest of four Jupiter's planet-sized moons, has been neglected. Even though it's a huge complex world very nearly the size of Mercury, it's neglected in favour of more spectacular moons elsewhere in the Jupiter system--volcanic Io, Europa with its oceans and possible life, even near-twin Ganymede with its grooved terrain--or other planet's moons like Saturn's atmosphere-laden Titan. It's even neglected in science fiction. When Jupiter is stellified at the end of Arthur C. Clarke's 2010--I blogged about the likely consequences of the stellification in January here--it's Ganymede that gets warmed into habitability, while Callisto is still a boring wasteland. Callisto's marked as a dead world, hence an uninteresting one.

Douglas Muir has stepped up to Callisto's defense. It's interesting, too, with its own evolutionary processes and mysteries! (Is it for certain it doesn't have a subsurface ocean, though?)

First, let's get the painfully obvious stuff out of the way: yes, Callisto is a bit on the bland side. It doesn't have an atmosphere, like Titan. It doesn' have volcanoes, like Io, or geysers, like Enceladus. It probably doesn't have a huge internal ocean of water like Europa. It's not part of a "double planet" like Charon. It doesn't have a magnetic field, like Ganymede. It's just a large, icy moon with a heavily cratered surface. So, yes, you could say that Callisto is less interesting than some other places.
Except that you'd be stupid to say that, because Callisto is actually pretty damn interesting.

Let's start with the most common misconception, which is that Callisto is "geologically dead". We're told that its surface is "saturated" with craters, so that any new crater would obliterate one or more old ones. Craters, nothing but craters. Right?

Wrong. Much of Callisto's surface is -- wait for it -- eroded. Yes, it's full of craters, but there are vast regions where the craters have been degraded to the point where you can hardly recognize them. All that's left are smooth, undulating basins with lumps or spires in the middle.

What's causing the erosion? Well, take a moment to consider how odd Callisto actually is. It's a large icy world that's relatively warm -- daytime surface temperatures get up to around 160 Kelvin, or about -170 Fahrenheit, and can peak at another 10 K higher than that at noon on the equator. That's actually pretty toasty for an ice moon. The other moons of Jupiter are all 30 or 40 degrees cooler than that. Callisto is warmer because it's dark -- it has a really low albedo. (Why? We're not sure. One guess is that radiolysis has broken down organic compounds, leaving a sooty residue.) Whatever the reason, Callisto is the warmest large icy body in the Solar System.

So Callisto gets warm enough that water ice can sublime. That's very different from, say, someplace like Titan. At Titan's 95 K, water ice is completely inert, dead as granite. But at 160 K? Water can actually have a vapor pressure. A very tiny vapor pressure, to be sure. But over geological time, many millions of years, water ice will slowly sublime away into the vacuum. The sharp edges of craters will gradually blur and then slump. Much of the vapor is lost to space, but some condenses as bright, reflective frost. That's what we're seeing when we look at Callisto... mostly dark stuff, but with gleaming shiny bright bits. So if you could walk around the surface of Callisto, it wouldn't look much like Earth's Moon, all gravel and sharp edges. Instead, most features would be rounded and soft-edged.

[. . .]

You'll still see a lot of people saying that Callisto's surface is "old", "ancient", or even "pristine". No. Even at the macro level, all those big craters have been softened by erosion, and the composition of the surface has been dramatically changed by radiolysis and the movement of volatiles. It's like the difference between a bright new shiny penny, and one that's old, worn down, and tarnished. And at the micro level, the scale of a human walking around, Callisto's surface has been completely transformed. It's not old at all.

And it's probably still evolving. Callisto's surface is being shaped by subtle, slow processes -- sublimation, condensation, radiolysis -- working over geologic time. These things aren't flashy. But they get results, and they're just as interesting as the faster and more blatant processes taking place on Io or Titan.


Go, read the post and the comments.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I've blogged in my past about my fascination with Ceres, the first asteroid discovered by astronomers, for decades considered a planet, and most recently reclassified (along with Pluto) as a dwarf planet. Another asteroid is dear to my heart, a geologically interesting body that also has its own claim to dwarf planet status, Vesta.

The discovery of Ceres in 1801 and Pallas in 1802 led German astronomer Heinrich Wilhelm Olbers to propose that the two objects were the remnants of a destroyed planet. In 1802 he sent a letter with his proposal to the English astronomer William Herschel, suggesting that a search near the locations where the orbits of Ceres and Pallas intersected might reveal more fragments. These orbital intersections were located in the constellations of Cetus and Virgo.[14]

Olbers commenced his search in 1802, and on March 29, 1807 he coincidentally discovered Vesta in the constellation Virgo. As the asteroid Juno had been discovered in 1804, this made Vesta the fourth object to be identified in the region that is now known as the main asteroid belt. This discovery was announced in a letter addressed to German astronomer Johann H. Schröter dated March 31. Olbers allowed the prominent mathematician Carl Friedrich Gauss to name the asteroid after the Roman virgin goddess of home and hearth, Vesta.


Vesta ended up losing its planetary status later in the 19th century, as the discovery of hundreds of other asteroids scattered in what came to be known as the asteroid belt led to the downgrading of these bodies. I think that this downgrading was a mistake in some respects, in that even the larger asteroids, like the larger moons of the outer Solar System (the four Galilean moons and Titan, called "secondary planets" also in the 19th century), weren't considered to be worlds of the same import as the "actually existing" planets. We have sent space probes out to distant Neptune, but nothing to the Ceres and Vesta discovered more than a generation before Neptune.

This, thankfully, is changing. Bad Astronomy linked to these superb NASA images of the Vesta surface, part of an ongoing effort to map first Vesta then Ceres for the benefit of the navigators of the Dawn space proibe, scheduled to visit Vesta in 2011 and Ceres in 2015.

Vesta from four angles

Vesta is a very unusual asteroid, and the key to understanding its unusual nature lies in its density. This rocky world can claim a density of 3.42 grams per cubic centimetre. This is substantially above the estimated density of ~2.07 grams per cubic centimetre estimated for Ceres, almost exactly the same as the 3.34 grams per cubic centimetre of Moon, and not that far removed from Mars' 3.93 grams per cubic centimetre. Even though Vesta is a very small body, estimated to have a diameter of 550 kilometers and a polar axis 462 km, and with a surface gravity a bit more than two percent of Earth's, Vesta is a dense, rocky body. It's unique in having a rocky surface, perhaps similar in composition to the maria of the Moon, that's so reflective that Vesta is the only asteroid visible to the naked eye. The asteroid--the only surviving member of its class--formed as particles collided and condensed over several million years, internal heat produced by the decay of a radioactive isotope of aluminum common in the early Solar System, this melting resulting in a sorting out of Vesta's material by density before the too-small world began to cool.

Vesta's complex surface is marked by one very, very big crater discoveredd in 1997.

The most prominent surface feature is an enormous crater 460 kilometres in diameter centered near the south pole. Its width is 80% of the entire diameter of Vesta. The floor of this crater is about 13 kilometres below, and its rim rises 4–12 km above the surrounding terrain, with total surface relief of about 25 km. A central peak rises 18 kilometres above the crater floor. It is estimated that the impact responsible excavated about 1% of the entire volume of Vesta, and it is likely that the Vesta family and V-type asteroids are the products of this collision. [. . .] Spectroscopic analyses of the Hubble images have shown that this crater has penetrated deep through several distinct layers of the crust, and possibly into the mantle, as indicated by spectral signatures of olivine.

Several other large craters about 150 kilometres wide and 7 kilometres deep are also present. A dark albedo feature about 200 kilometres across has been named Olbers in honour of Vesta's discoverer, but it does not appear in elevation maps as a fresh crater would. Its nature is presently unknown; it may be an old basaltic surface. It serves as a reference point with the 0° longitude prime meridian defined to pass through its center.

The eastern and western hemispheres show markedly different terrains. From preliminary spectral analyses of the Hubble Space Telescope images, the eastern hemisphere appears to be some kind of high albedo, heavily cratered "highland" terrain with aged regolith, and craters probing into deeper plutonic layers of the crust. On the other hand, large regions of the western hemisphere are taken up by dark geologic units thought to be surface basalts, perhaps analogous to the lunar maria.


The large south-polar crater--visible in the two top images--may be the scar produced by a collision that ejected perhaps one percent of its mass via at least one massive impact a billion years ago, creating a signifcant family of asteroids was thrown off of the Vestan surface by this and other impacts.

Could Vesta be elevated to the status of a dwarf planet? Maybe. The infamous International Astronomical Union resolution defines planets as bodies massive enough to pull themselves into spherical shapes through their own gravity. Vesta isn't a sphere, perhaps a result of that collision, and it has only a quarter the mass of the already small Ceres. If Dawn determines that Vesta is massive enough to mold itself into a sphere, and if it turns out that Vesta's oblateness is productive of the aforementioned massive asteroid collision, Vesta could join Ceres in that elite club.

Age of miracles and wonders.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Bad Astronomy's Phil Plait lets us know that T Pyxidis, a recurring nova star that might go supernova, isn't nearly close enough to kill us all.

  • Global Sociology examines the very serious impact of the telenovela on all elements of popular culture but wonders how relevant it is to the North American soap opera experience.

  • To commemorate Galileo's discovery of Jupiter's four planet-sized moons, Johnny Pez linked to four classic science-fiction short stories, each one set on a different moon. He also reports on the 1930s' race to ascend into the stratosphere.

  • Marginal Revolution reports on a study of housing in India that suggests majority communities will respond more favourably to religious minorities if there's little residential segregation.

  • Slap Upside the Head reports ona questionable Calgary Stampede marketing survey that asks respondents some homophobic questions.

  • Spacing Toronto looks at Thistledown, a community long since assimilated into Toronto by the city's growth.

  • Window on Eurasia considers whether Bonapartism--militarized and populist, but centralized and modernizing, on the model of Napoleon III--might be in Russia's future.

rfmcdonald: (Default)


I have to thank 80 Beats for their blog post "400 Years After Galileo Spotted Them, the Moons of Jupiter Are Looking Fly", and for this image showing the four Galilean moons--Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto--against their parent body of Jupiter.

On January 7, 1610, Galileo Galilei pointed his “spyglass” to the heavens and stared up at Jupiter, one of the brightest lights in the evening sky, and noted what he at first assumed to be three bright stars near the planet. But over the following nights, he realized that those three bright bodies weren’t fixed in the heavens like stars, but rather seemed to dance around Jupiter along with a fourth, smaller body.

Galileo triumphantly announced his discovery of four “planets” that revolved around Jupiter in his March treatise, Starry Messenger [pdf]. Thinking of his pocketbook, he dutifully proposed naming them the Medicean Stars in honor of his patron, Cosimo de Medici. But the name didn’t stick, and today we honor the scientist rather than the patron by calling Jupiter’s four largest satellites the Galilean moons.

The discovery dealt a death blow to the Ptolemaic understanding of the universe, in which all planets and stars were believed to orbit the Earth. For, as Galileo wrote in his treatise, “our own eyes show us four stars which wander around Jupiter as does the moon around the earth.”

In the 400 years that have passed since Galileo first laid eyes on them, we’ve learned a great deal about the moons Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto (all named after the mythological paramours of Jupiter). If all goes according to plan we’ll soon get to know them much more intimately–NASA and the European Space Agency are currently planning missions to closely observe three of the moons.

Profile

rfmcdonald: (Default)rfmcdonald

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
28      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 14th, 2025 03:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios