rfmcdonald: (Default)
Did you know that PFLAG--Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, one of the premiere support groups for relatives of non-heterosexuals--has a Chinese branch now? I didn't until I came across an Economist article describing the latest progress in gay rights in China.

The organization has clearly come a long way since its foundation, documented in a 2010 article in the Global Times' Beijing edition. This interesting-looking documentary on parents of out children in China is likewise promising.

Homosexuality was declassified as a mental illness in China a decade ago, but prejudice remains deep. So when an editor at the government education department in the city of Hangzhou was compiling a pamphlet recently to help parents guide their children through puberty, she included a warning about “deviant” behaviour.

What she may not have expected was an irate open letter in response from a group of mothers of gay children. Eighteen mothers, from all over China, affiliated with Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays, an NGO known as PFLAG China, signed the letter. It called for the book to be withdrawn.

“We’re extremely angry about this,” one of the signatories says who asked only to be identified by her internet name: Romantic Mum from Hebei. “Understanding and accepting gay people starts with education,” she continues. “But if kids continue to get this kind of education, the prejudice will remain.”

The mother says her own “unsuitable education” meant that she was devastated when her son came out to her at the age of 15: “I kept asking myself what I had done wrong in bringing him up.” But last year, after joining some online discussion groups, she accepted that her son was not going to change. Now she helps run PFLAG’s hotline, which offers advice to parents of gay children.

PFLAG’s director, Hu Zhijun, says that ten years ago very few children came out to their parents. Now, with more information available online, a new generation of gay people are more confident. “They’re more likely to tell their parents and classmates,” he says.

The government editor’s response was encouraging too: she invited the volunteers for a chat, apologised for not knowing much about gay people, and said there will be changes in the next edition of the book.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I've blogged in the past about Guido Westerwelle, Germany's out Foreign Minister. Towleroad today pointed to a news story suggesting that the Belarusian president used Westerwelle's sexual orientation to try to trigger a diplomatic incident following the suppression of free elections.

Last November in Minsk, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko suggested to German Minister of Foreign Affairs Guido Westerwelle that he should cease being gay.

Lukashenko recently acknowledged the incident, telling reporters that he dislikes "faggots" and confirming he told Westerwelle "it is necessary to live a normal life."

Russian gay activist Nikolai Alekseev expressed surprise that there was little reaction to the incident from German gay activists or the German government.

"To leave without reaction what Lukashenko said is nothing else than setting a dangerous precedent," Alekseev said. "If he can bash verbally a German minister on his sexual orientation, then why he would not do it with all Belarusian LGBT people.

"People have to understand that their absence of reaction can have some negative side effects to others."


ILGA Europe went into more detail about the comments, the Gay Russia site going into more detail after Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorsky himself.

According to the Polish Minister, the Belarusian President created a diplomatic incident when he told the openly gay German Minister that all gays should be sent to State Farms.

"When I was in Minsk together with Guido Westerwelle, we talked about minorities, and not just national minorities. Similarly (concerning sexual minorities) Alexander Lukashenko also expressed himself. I recognise that it should not be an example for members of the Civil platform" explained Radoslava Sikorsky to the News Agency Regnum on February 14.

Citing sources in the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Polish daily «Wprost» writes that during the meeting of the Polish and German foreign ministers in Minsk, President Lukashenko made a long monologue.

"He said he does not understand how a man can live with a man. It was an obvious allusion to Westerwelle, who has a partner. The German minister looked nervous, but Lukashenko went even further. In very severe form, he said he did not have anything against lesbians, but that he would be happy to send gay men to State farms" writes the newspaper.

On the eve of last December Presidential elections in Belarus, Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski together with his German counterpart, Guido Westerwelle, travelled to Minsk, where they both called President Alexander Lukashenko to hold transparent and fair elections. Mr Lukashenko was re-elected on the first round with 79.67% of the votes.


The situation for GLBT rights in Belarus isn't very good, so it's probably not surprising that Lukashenko used Westerwelle's sexual orientation--broadly unremarkable in Germany, increasingly so in Poland--to delegitmize European criticism of Belarus' totalitarianism. Alekseev quoted above is right to note that letting Lukashenko's bigotry pass for three months without any public criticism likely isn't good; certainly it seems indicative of Lukahshenko's respect for minority rights generally.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • 80 Beats observes the discovery of a star in the Large Magellanic Cloud, a satellite galaxy of our Milky Way, that's the most massive star discovered to date with a mass three hundred times that of our sun.

  • At the Everyday Sociology Blog, Janice Prince Inniss writes about the rising rates of intermarriage in the United States, with Asians and Hispanics marrying outside their demographic more often than whites or blacks, and some potential partners (whites, mainly) more valued than others.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money's Robert Farley is properly scathing of a book, Walter Laqueur's The Last Days of Europe, that's terribly sloppy in its argument that Europe is becoming Eurabia.

  • Marginal Revolution quotes from a Stratfor analysis of Greece's situation that's altogether too reductionistic: Greek problems aren't all about geography, people.

  • At the Search, Douglas Todd points out that rumours that Muslim birth rates in Canada are so high that soon we'll be elected Muslim prime ministers are, well, Eurabia.

  • Towleroad's Andy Towle announces that after many years, the Obama administration has helped the International Lesbian and Gay Human Rights Commission to finally gain consultative status at the United Nations, along with other groups. Abroad, a coalition of mainly Muslim countries has opposed the recognition; inside the United States, some Republicans followed suit.

  • Undercover Economist Tim Harford writes about the thriving--and mass popularity--of board games like Settlers of Catan in Germany.

  • Window on Eurasia reports speculations that the recent ouster of the nationalist governor of the Russian republic of Bashkortostan might mean that the Russian government is finally going to place the autonomous ethnic republics more tightly under its control.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Acts of Minor Treason's Andrew Barton points out that genes aren't everything, that the environment (in its broadest sense) controls the expression of genes in any species.

  • blogTO's guest writer Matthew Harris summarizes the controversy surrounding the Bohemian Embassy condo development on Queen Street West.

  • Centauri Dreams speculates about the idea of humanity dispatching biological packages to distant worlds in order to encourage the panspermic spread of our biosphere. The idea is controversial.

  • At Crooked Timber, Henry Farrell speculates that the ongoing debt crisis in Greece might accelerate European integration.

  • Far Outliers visits anti-Chinese legislation in independent Indonesia and the treatment of Chinese in the Dutch East Indies by Japan during the Second World War.

  • A Fistful of Euros' Douglas Muir examines the upcoming examination of the legality of Kosovo's declaration of independence, suggesting that the court's likely to fudge the decision rather than take a controversial stance.

  • Joe. My. God announces the good news that the European Union is requiring aspiring member-states to respect gay rights and the sad news that the Roman Catholic diocese of Washington D.C. has closed down its foster child program rather than stop discriminating against same-sex couples.

  • Language Hat explores the sorts of largely good-hearted ethnic jokes made by people in the very multiethnic Russian Caucasian republic of Dagestan.

  • The Search's Douglas Todd writes about how a Pentecostal preacher has been coordinating chaplaincy services

  • Steve Munro points out that, contrary to rumour, the TTC employs ten thousand people.

  • Window on Eurasia suggests that Lithuania's overlookied Russophone community is starting to mobilize behind demands for greater recognition.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
John Lorinc's Globe and Mail article on the emergence of out politicians in Canada is worth reading in full. Unfortunately, most of it is behind the paper's subscription firewall.

When Toronto mayoral candidate George Smitherman kissed his spouse, Christopher Peloso, before a bank of cameras this week, he announced his campaign with a public display of affection normally reserved for heterosexual candidates and their spouses.

The gesture may have appeared casual, but it signalled two things to Canadians: that same-sex marriage is becoming an acceptable part of the country's social and political geography and that being openly gay is no longer a liability for politicians. As David Rayside, a University of Toronto professor of political science and sexual diversity, notes, “Visibility counts.”

Mr. Smitherman will be getting a whole lot more visibility during the next year as he seeks to become the first gay mayor of Canada's largest city. And he may not be the only candidate reaching for that goal: He will probably be challenged by another openly gay politician, Glen Murray. The two-term former mayor of Winnipeg has not yet formally announced his candidacy, but he has acknowledged that he is considering joining the race.

Their opponent, in turn, will almost certainly be businessman and radio host John Tory, a socially progressive conservative who once lost a hard-fought provincial riding race to another openly gay candidate, Kathleen Wynne.

As a one-time health minister, Mr. Smitherman, 44, will certainly face far more questions about his role in the eHealth Ontario scandal than about his sexual orientation. That's as it should be. Few Torontonians – or Vancouverites or Montrealers – would be surprised to learn that lifestyle is no longer an issue in local politics. But are Canadians outside large urban centres – especially those in small towns or rural areas – prepared to elect openly gay politicians to top leadership roles, such as premier or prime minister?

Pollster Michael Adams, who tracks social values in Canada, says sexual orientation isn't an issue. “We're at the point where we're past it,” he says. “There are groups whose cultural differences are more controversial than being gay.”


The previously mentioned Scott Brison, out since 2002, made bids for the Progressive Conservative party leadership in 2003 and for the Liberal Party leadership in 2006. In both campaigns, his sexual orientation wasn't an issue, at least not openly. Television coemdian Rick Mercer suggests in his 2003 interview of Brison that his Nova Scotianness was the problem.



Lorinc does conclude by noting that some of the more prominent gay politicians, like Liberal George Smitherman in Ontario and John Baird for the Conservatives in Ottawa, have become prominent through their aggressiveness: the two men were loud enforcers for their governments, known for being aggressive and constantly on the offensive. Might there be parallels with the way that the first crop of female national leaders--Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher, say--were notable for their hard-headedness and aggressiveness? If gay politicians now, like female politicians a couple of decades ago, have to be aggressive in order to be taken seriously, contrary to Lorinc's assertion there's still a way to go.

"What are things like in your countries," I ask my readers.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • At Acts of Minor Treason, Andrew's very skeptical about the good sense of ideas to save money on the TTC by cutting service: positive feedback loops in negative directions are always nasty. (Thanks to [livejournal.com profile] mindstalk for correcting my terminology.)

  • Bad Astronomy's Phil Plait shows pictures of the footsteps of the Apollo 12 astronauts taken by a recent Moon probe.

  • Centauri Dreams reports that, in the recent tradition of astronomers finding smaller and more distant objects, a small chunk of ice a bit less than one kilometre across was found seven billion kilometres away from Earth by the Hubble.

  • The Global Sociology blog tackles the nurture-versus-nature debate on gender differences and argues strongly on nurture's side.

  • Joe. My. God lets us know that a North Carolina politician mocked the sexual orientation of another politician's dead gay son, and that Rwanda is also considering strongly homophobic legislation on the Ugandan model.

  • Language Log's Geoff Nunberg discusses the question of how linguists should respond to conflicts of interest, with the discussions expanding upon what a conflict of interest for linguists actually is.

  • Murdering Mouth wonders how, or if, you can break through to someone operating under a completely different paradigm.

  • Inspired by Douglas Muir's posts from the Congo at Halfway Down the Danube, Noel Maurer uses Mexican history to demonstrate that banks and breweries can survive extreme levels of violence.

  • Slap Upside the Head reports on anti-gay freakouts, among gamers unhappy with a same-sex encounter in a video game, and with homophobes who don't like a Nova Scotia MPs inclusion of a picture of him with his husband on his Christmas mailing.

  • the F OR V M discusses the question of whether or not the failing of US companies to bid on Iraqi oil means that they expect significantly greater instability in that country in a year's time.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Buju Banton, a Jamaican reggae star perhaps best known outside reggae fandom for homophobia, whether the murderous sentiments expressed in songs like "Boom Bye Bye" ("World is in trouble/Anytime Buju Banton come/Batty bwoy get up an run/At gunshot me head back") or for his joining in a mob assault on gay men in Jamaica, has been arrested on cocaine charges in Florida. Good for him.

A few years ago, I stated forthrightly that so long as murderous homophobia is popular in Jamaica and supported to one degree or another by the Jamaican government, the country can go rot. Why would I want to visit a place where that sort of behaviour is acceptable? Who would? If things improve, fine, but I've no interest in waiting. Uganda's anti-gay bill, passed by factions with a worrying amount of support by American evangelicals and so far lacking much of the opposition one might have hoped churches to voice against that sort of murderous persecution, makes me think the same way about that country.

Except. Joe. My. God. made a couple of posts (1, 2) about Banton's arrest, and while the number of Buju Banton supporters appearing to defend their star was annoying (no, he is not the next Martin Luther King) the number of commenters who were responding to those commenters using language little short of racist was shocking. To what extent, I wonder, does support for equal rights for any minority and disgust at a country that intentionally falls short correspond with bigotry of one kind or another?
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • blogTO's Robin Sharp reports on the latest fears that the Annex, arguably the signature neighbourhood of Jane Jacobs' urbanism philosophy, is on the verge of changing hugely.

  • James Bow thanks the opposition parties in the Canadian parliament for passing a resolution forcing the Conservative government to release documentation relevant to the torture of Canadian detainees.

  • Daniel Drezner lets us know that North Korea's revaluation of its currency is producing measurable levels of popular unrest and fears this may help hardliners be all the more in control and remain aggressive internationally.

  • English Eclectic's Paul Halsall thanks American conservative preacher Rick Warren for condemning Uganda's anti-gay law.

  • At Gideon Rachman's blog, the Financial Times' Victor Mallet documents the latest tiresomeness of the Anglo-Spanish confrontations re: Gibraltar.

  • Global Sociology notes that poor countries are great places to dump toxic waste.

  • Douglas Muir at Halfway Down the Danube explores the machinations behind Congo's bizarre seafront and Angola's enclave of Cabinda.

  • Marginal Revolution points out that, contrary to libertarian fantasies, the Confederate States of America was actually quite a strong state.

  • Normblog's Norman Geras points out that using Saudi Arabia's low level of religious tolerance as a standard anywhere in the world is a Bad Thing.

  • Noel Maurer follows up on Douglas Muir's post on Congo's weird maritime border by examining how that border created the oil-rich Angolan enclave of Cabinda, and documents Venezuela's now-finished oil-driven economic boom.

  • Strange Maps documents another case of long-standing cultural differences driving politics, here dialectal differences mapping onto support for conservative and liberal parties in Denmark.

  • At Understanding Society, Daniel Little examines how recent community surveys in southeastern Michigan document the recession's severe effects, and examines Arthur Koestler's fictional take on Bukharin.

  • At the Volokh Conspiracy, Eugene Volokh reveals that even states which explicitly don't recognize same-sex marriage recognize the parenting rights of same-sex couples, split or otherwise, as per long-standing practice.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
I lost a friend over this question, discussed at Torontoist.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, Canada was rocked with its worst public health disaster ever: the tainted blood scandal. After being infused with infected blood product, one thousand Canadian Red Cross patients contracted HIV and twenty thousand more were infected with hepatitis C. Even worse, a federal health employee claimed that it was known by the early 1980s that contaminated blood existed within the system.

In the years that followed, the feds instituted a compensation program for infected patients, and the Red Cross was ordered by the Supreme Court to pay seventy-nine million dollars in settlements. The scandal caused the Red Cross (now succeeded by Canadian Blood Services) to establish one of its most controversial policies: any man who had any type of sexual contact—even once—with another man since 1977 was barred from donating blood products.

This policy is not unique to Canadian Blood Services; it's ubiquitous in blood agencies around the world, despite state-of-the-art tests now employed to screen-out diseased blood. There are also many other conditions that will disqualify potential donors, although the system is only as effective as the applicants are honest. This autumn, however, CBS finally started accepting stem cell donations from gay men. The latest Health Canada guidelines now allow for tissue, cell, and organ donation by gay men, but that change doesn't apply to blood products. Some say that the screening technology is now effective enough that it doesn't pose a significant risk to the hundreds of Canadians waiting for donors, and that the policy perpetuates longstanding myths about gay men; others feel that prohibiting gay men from donating is not discriminatory, but simply a matter of public safety and common sense.


My problem with the ban is that modern RNA tests can pick up the virus at a very early stage of infection--days, as opposed to months--and that the blood-donation ban is a reflex reaction to the ghastly tainted blood scandal. On balance, however, I support the ban, inasmuch as queer men do have substantially higher rates and incidences of HIV infection than their straight counterparts, other demographics with an above-average rates and incidences of infection with HIV and other blood-born diseases are also banned, there is still a certain if low risk of infected blood making it through, and I'm really at a loss to understand how having one's own blood and body parts be used in medical procedures is a right.

And you?
rfmcdonald: (Default)
I like these links. I also like posting without HTML errors--sorry!


  • Acts of Minor Treason's Andrew remarks--with pictures--on how there isn't very much old Toronto at all.
  • Anthropology.net reacts to a neuroscientist, one David Eagleman, who seems to argue that he human capacity for synaesthesia--briefly, the ability for people's sensory impressions to cross-connect in an unusual way--has interesting implications for human consciousness.

  • Bad Astronomy reacts to the news that astronomers have found a correlation between the likelihood that a star hosts planets and that of low lithium abundance. Centauri Dreams pays attention to the same findings.

  • A BCer in Toronto's Jeff Jedras considers the ongoing Romanian presidential election campaign from his position on the ground.

  • John Quiggin at Crooked Timber argues that the European leaders who started the First World War are mass murderers on the scale of a Hitler or a Stalin.

  • Daniel Drezner is skeptical of the idea that China will escape the nearly iron-clad law that countries of a certain income will democratize, based on China's past precedent.

  • English Eclectic's Paul Halsall pronounces himself decidedly in favour of the European Union and the Lisbon Treaty.

  • Everyday Sociology makes the argument that the exceptionally tight structure of military life helps create people predisposed to random violence.

  • Far Outliers describes anti-Greek violence by Ottoman authorities in Thessaloniki in 1821, and quotes Niall Ferguson's suggestion that 1979, not 1989, saw the biggest break from the past with the rise of China and radical Islam.

  • Global Sociology examines the arguments of Afghan woman parliamentarian Malalai Joya and her despair at the continued fundamentalism of Afghanistan's leaders and reports on findings that although women tend to live longer than men, they have a lower quality of life.

  • The Grumpy Sociologist points out that the selection of Laos as host of the Southeast Asian Games makes the poor country into a field for economic competition between powerful neighbouring states for influence.

  • Language Hat takes note of the ubiquity of Hungarians.

  • Language Log's Mark Liberman really doesn't like the idea that differences in landscape necessarily translate into huge differences in language and meaning.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money's Sek rightly despairs for Camille Paglia's good sense.

  • Erin's Lost & Found, heavy on art, features an excellent picture of me.
  • Marginal Revolution hosts a discussion on whether or not the sheer size of the economic gap between many developing countries and their developed counterparts is promoting an unproductive despair on the part of the former.

  • Noel Maurer reports that the fact that uranium production is tightly-linked to particular states means that there isn't any integrated, elastic, uranium market.

  • Slap Upside the Head reacts to news from the United States that same-sex couples behave quite similarly to opposite-sex ones in terms of parenting and whatnot.

  • Torontoist reviews Torontonian David Sax's work on the deli and its decline as related to Jewish assimilation.

  • Towleroad announces that an opposite-sex couple in the United Kingdom want a gay civil partnership in order to protest the exclusion of same-sex couples from marriage. (Peter Tatchell has pronounced himself in favour of the extension of these basic rights to opposite-sex couples.

  • The Yorkshire Ranter reports on Nigeria's defeat of the various Niger Delta militias demanding control of local oil reserves.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • Far Outliers takes a look at the syncretism that marked the Jews of Ottoman-era Salonica.
  • Lawyers, Guns and Money's Dave Brockington is perplexed by the British Conservatives' erratic and unproductive policies on Europe, and also makes the point that Democratic defeats in recent elections and referenda in the United States have to do with key components of Obama's coalition like the young and minorities not turning out.

  • Noel Maurer writes about the long-term impact of financial crises on trend economic growth.

  • J. Otto Pohl blogs about the man responsible for the creation of Kyrgyzstan back in the 1920s.

  • Passing Strangeness explores the mystery of what, exactly, the early 16th century infectious English Sweate actually was.

  • Slap Upside the Head lets us know that children's publisher Scholastic censored a book featuring lesbian parents, and reports on the happy enws that the United States now allows HIV-positive visitors within its borders.

  • Will Baird at the Dragon's Tales reports on a new initiative on Guamanian statehood.

  • The Voloh Conspiracy's Ilya Somin makes the obvious point that Leon Trotsky was an evil, evil man.

  • Window on Eurasia blogs about the transformation of identities among Daghestani migrants in Russian cities and the prevalence of nationalism ahead of religion as an anti-Russian force in the North Caucasus.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
Noreen Fagan writes in Xtra! about how many same-sex binational couples, and not only in the United States, move to Canada as the only way that they can keep their families together.

I walked with purpose, my boots hitting the floor in a tempo that echoed my urgency. My mouth was dry and anxiety had sunk into the creases on my face. My family walked behind me, no one daring to talk in case my composure collapsed. I knew where to go and what to do. In my hand — now sweaty — I gripped an unassuming brown envelope that carried my family’s future in it. Our Canadian immigration papers.

It was just after midnight in early March 2007. We were walking down a wide hallway from the plane into Toronto’s Pearson International Airport, towards a glass window with signs directing new immigrants inside. We entered the room and went to the last counter that was open, handed our papers over to a small woman who, in a matter of fact way, stamped our papers, took our photographs and confirmed our permanent resident status before shuffling us toward customs. Like it was nothing.

It didn’t register right away that we were basically home free. Less than an hour later we walked out of the airport. We were tired but exhilarated — the relief was palpable. Only then could I let myself breathe. We hugged: me, my partner Tamara and our two boys. But it was Sebastian, our eldest son, who stirred up the emotion in all of us when he stopped and, referring back to the immigration officer said, “Mum, I like this country. That was the first time we have ever been called a family.”

Walking out of the airport that night, stamped papers in hand, was the last step on a journey that began when I first came out as a lesbian in Lusaka, Zambia in 1993. At 30 years old, I left a seven-year marriage and, with two young sons, embraced my sexual orientation in a country where proven incidents of homosexual conduct could land you in jail for up to 40 years.

It was then that I began my search for a place that my family could call home. It was a journey that, when I met my partner Tamara, turned epic. It took us from Zambia via the United States to Canada.

My partner is American and I am Zambian. We have been together for 12 years and have raised two sons — we are a family in our eyes, in our friends’ eyes, in the eyes of the Canadian government — but not according to the Zambian or United States governments. There, we have no status and no chance of living as a couple or a family.

“We considered a marriage between Noreen and my gay brother but what kind of a message is that to give your children?” says Tam when people ask her about other options. “Trying to teach them tolerance and pride, telling them there is nothing to be ashamed of — but, you need to lie to the social workers, your teachers, just about everyone.”

When it came down to it, living in the US was a short-term answer to a lifelong commitment. My sons and I moved there from Zambia in 2000 knowing that the chances of living there permanently depended heavily on the political climate. After four years of living together in the US, with no recognition as a couple or a family in sight, we applied to immigrate to Canada — something we later learned is a common strategy for binational same-sex couples.

The decision was wrought with emotion. Tam was devastated that she would have to leave the US, her family and her job. In turn, I was angry that, as a queer couple, we had to pay a high price for living in the US — higher taxes because Tam was considered a single person, $20,000 a year in university fees in order to keep my student visa. There was no possibility of socking away any money with a family of four living on one salary and with no idea of what the future held.

In the end, it was the boys’ future and our desire to see them in a welcoming environment that caused us to buckle down and start the lengthy application process. We spent months completing paperwork and pooling family funds. After the application was in, we waited anxiously for two years until we were finally accepted as permanent residents of Canada.

By Aug 11, 2008, we were ready to finally move. We packed the last of our things in a minivan and headed off to Canada, leaving behind our friends and our community in Carrboro, North Carolina. It was one of the hardest things that I have ever done — to leave friends who had become like family to us. Leaving them was, and still is, a harsh reminder of the sacrifices we have made in order to be accepted as a family. Though we’re certainly not the only ones.


Go, read the rest.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Continuing the theme on yesterday's post about GLBT rights and family values, I thought I'd like to Paul Hogarth's article in San Francisco's Beyond Chronicle, which, well, is as hopeful as the subject line suggests. There's material reasons for this hopefulness.

I truly believe that – with our help – Maine will become the first state in the nation to successfully defend marriage equality at the ballot box, providing a roadmap for California to repeal Proposition 8. Maine activists have been working hard for five years to pass gay marriage, but events in the last few days now point to what should be an historic victory on November 3rd. With only 19 days left, what I’m seeing from the “Yes on 1” campaign reminds me of where “No on 8” was at this point last year – outgunned by the opposition, unable to control the message and at a loss about what to do. If Question 1 passes, it will be our fault for not having done more. But if Question 1 fails, those of us who get involved will have made history – which is why I hope to go back for the last four days. Here are the reasons for my optimism ...

One reason why I got involved in this effort was that “No on 1” said they only needed $3 million dollars for the entire campaign – a pittance compared with California efforts. “We’re a cheap date,” said campaign manager Jesse Connolly at this year’s Netroots Nation Convention. New fundraising totals that came out this week show that “No on 1” has already raised $2.7 million (with most of the money coming from Maine residents) – and bloggers are planning a big fundraising push for today that should keep them on track with their goal.

The bigger news, however, is that “Yes on 1” reported only raising $1.1 million – with a campaign debt of $400,000 (our side has no debt.) This provoked their spokesman Marc Mutty (who is on loan from the Portland Archdiocese) to send out an urgent message on October 13th that their cause was under “financial assault.” In the mass e-mail, which can be reviewed in full here, Mutty says they had known from the opposition’s superior ground game that our side had been raising more money. But they had “never dreamed the situation was as dire as it is,” and are now urging their supporters to make a “sacrificial contribution” to pass Question 1.


Religion has also been defused.

A group called Catholics for Marriage Equality has staged walk-outs on Sunday services when the Church took up second collection plates on behalf of the “Yes on 1” campaign, and “No on 1” has organized several press conferences with religious leaders. As a result, media coverage in Maine newspapers has talked about how communities of faith are on “both sides” of the issue.

Now, the question has taken center stage. The “No on 1” campaign’s latest ad features Yolande Dumont, a French Catholic grandmother from Lewiston – a conservative city in Maine – who speaks about her gay son, his partner and their child. Yolande mentions that she’s a devout Catholic, her faith is important to her, and that she supports marriage equality. In an election where “No on 1” has had to respond to many of the opposition’s attacks, it is a positive TV ad with a general “feel-good” message about the value of strong families.

[. . . There] a distinction between rank-and-file Catholic voters (many who, like Dumont, support marriage equality) and the Church hierarchy. Maine is a very Catholic state, but it also has one of the lowest levels in church attendance – which suggests that many Catholics are already a bit disillusioned with their Church leadership. The reason they cite for pulling the ad will only infuriate Maine Catholics, because it says they cannot have a different opinion from the hierarchy.


And finally, the ads appeal to the fact that Mainers know same-sex couples already and Mainers are fundamentally fair people who really do care about children.

In every state where marriage equality has been on the ballot, opponents have used “the children” as a means of scaring swing voters – preying on their worst fears about what gays and lesbians will do to kids in the classroom. From the start, “No on 1” has pre-empted this attack by bringing up the fact that many gay couples raise children. When opponents brought up the tired line that gay marriage will be “taught” in public schools, our side has countered that what schools teach is that no child should feel ashamed of what kind of family they may come from.

On my last morning in Maine, the Portland Press Herald had a front-page “human interest” profile of two couples on each side of Question 1. The ones supporting it were a Christian couple concerned about the “sanctity” of marriage. The opponents were a lesbian couple who are raising two daughters. For them, said the Press Herald, it was “all about the kids” – i.e., they want a safe and secure future for their children that comes from being raised by a legally married couple.


Go, read the article in full.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Over at France's Cité Gay, a writer asks ("Le Pacte Civil de Solidarité (Pacs) fête ses 10 ans," ""The PACS celebrates its 10th birthday) what the PACS, a " form of civil union between two adults (same-sex or opposite-sex) for organising their joint life [that] brings rights and responsibilities, but less so than marriage," is like now. Right-wingers worst-case claims, are, of course, decidedly counterfactual.

The PACS at its adoption was assailed by opponents on the grounds that it would lower the birth rate of France and it would devalue marriage. With a fertility rate that exceeds two children per woman, France ranks alongside Ireland as the champion of the birth rate in Europe. INSEE in its Demographic Balance in 2008 report was the beginning of the observation that France was the top European countries in terms of births and the number of marriages remained relatively stable.

But is the success of the PACS that does not contradict this. 146,084 PACS were registered in 2008 by the Statistical Office of the Ministry of Justice, an increase of 43% compared to 2007 (against 32% between 2006 and 2007). With these figures, France had passed since the millionth PACS mark. PACS' endings are also stable: 23,354 civil partnerships were broken in 2008, against 22,783 in 2007. Finally, same-sex couples constitute a stable rate percetnage of about 6% of registered partnerships in total, but their number continues to grow in absolute numbers although less so than for same-sex couples.


This, as the author notes, compares nicely to the stability of relationships in general.

The critics of Pacs suggest that PACS are unstable despite the facts without commenting on specific statistics of divorce, which continues to grow in number and has risen percentage-wise (over 72 000 divorces in 2007) and to a lesser extent the acceptance of divorce has almost doubled in ten years (28 000 divorces in 2007), only twenty years after it became possible. the fault is now 20 years into a minority when it was the rule.In 2007, the number of divorces totaled 134,477, after a period of stability around 120,000 divorces a year from 1996 to 2002.

It is society as a whole that wants more flexibility in organizing our families, as is reflected in the success of PACS and the modes of termination of marriage; births and unions are increasingly disconnected with number of births outside marriage in the majority.


Survivor rights and binational PACS remain major problems.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
Slap Upside the Head always has wonderful links. Catholic Vote Action, it seems, is unhappy about a pro-same-sex marriage television advertisement in Maine, the state preparing for a referendum on same issue. Why?

Catholic Vote Action, a religious political group based in Chicago, is demanding that an ad supporting equal marriage rights in the state of Maine be pulled off the air.

The ad, which features a real family including a Catholic grandmother who supports her gay son and his adopted child, was produced by Protect Maine Equality in response to an upcoming ballot initiative that would take away the existing right of gay couples to marry in the state. “I’ve been a Catholic all my life,” the grandmother says in the ad, “my faith means a lot to me.” She continues, “Marriage to me is a great institution that works, and it’s what I want for my children too.”

Essentially, it’s a real-life example of how it’s possible to harmonize one’s faith and family, supporting the loving relationships in which families can flourish.

Unacceptable, of course, according to Catholic Vote Action, who released a press release on Monday declaring that all Catholics do not support “counterfeit marriages” and demanding that the ad be pulled immediately. Because, as we all know, loving and supporting your family throughout hardships and mean-spirited attacks just isn’t a value worth keeping.



What I find amusing, in a twisted kind of way, is not only the group's assumption that queers can't constitute families, but the group's assumption that queers don't have valid families, that families are unwilling to stand together and figure out solutions to their problems and that these processes include the sorts of people that Catholic Vote Action wants to exclude altogether.
rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • blogTO's Rick McGinnis blogs about the disappearance of the former Bohemian district of Gerrard Village thanks to rising real estate prices.
  • James Bow comments on the Louisiana judge opposed to interracial marriage. Racist, that last guy.

  • Far Outliers links to a source discussing how Fijians of Melanesian background, not just Indo-Fijians, are beginning to become sailors on the world stage in larger numbers. The blog also tackles the remnants of Thessaloniki's multiculturalism.

  • Language Log reports on language conflict in Taiwan and Guangdong, as locals try to reassert their languages against Putongua. In a related post, the blog wonders what exactly constitutes an ethnic group.

  • Lawyers, Guns and Money's Robert Farley savages American conservative commentator Charles Krauthammer.

  • Peter Rukavina links to a video tour of Toronto's Coach House Press.

  • Slap Upside the Head notes that yet another group of "concerned citizens" want to forcibly exclude a GLBT-themed book from a public library.

  • Towleroad reports that American gay writer Edmund White thinks that same-sex marriage is radical simply because it normalized same-sex couples.

  • Window on Eurasia observes that an opening of the Turkish-Armenian frontier would transform the mental maps and national identities of Armenians and Turks alike, and also comments on Russia's emergence as a supplier of raw materials to China.

rfmcdonald: (Default)

  • blogTO reports that Church Street restaurant Zelda's has moved away on account of too-expensive rents.

  • Excitingly, Centauri Dreams talks about a model of the Europan interior ocean that allows for the possibility of large amounts of oxygen dissolved in that moon's water, creating the possibility for macroscopic life, not just microorganisms.

  • Crooked Timber argues that European left-wing political parties have done so badly of late because, well, there isn't much left-wing about them any more.

  • Daniel Drezner doesn't think that China's possession of US Treasury bonds makes it all that much a financial power, and likewise doesn't think that Europe's long experience with multinational negotiations via the European Union will help it at the G-20 table.

  • English Eclectic's Paul Hall is critical of some criticism of an increasingly queer-friendly British Conservative Party for its anti-gay European Parliament allies.

  • Far Outliers quotes a reflection on the frequent contradictions between official and personal histories as illustrated by the history of Thessaloniki.

  • Gideon Rachman blogs about the intensification of Latvia's ongoing economic crisis.

  • Hunting Monsters says that the problems surrounding the European Constitution's passage and the documents lack of popularity generally reflect wider European ambivalence about an unaccountable Union.
  • Normblog cites a couple of paragraphs by David Malouf making the point that one of the best things about cities is the way they can detach people from tribes.

  • Slap Upside the Head reports on a recent court ruling in Russia establishing the legal non-existence of same-sex marriage in that country.

  • Window on Eurasia reports that most Ukrainians don't see a military threat from Russia and observes the growing role of Central Asians and Caucasians in Russian Islamic communities.

rfmcdonald: (Default)
I was surprised to find out, via Slap Upside the Head, about the horror story experienced by a Canadian gay couple in Dubai. Xtra has it.

A gay Toronto couple was detained for 28 days in Dubai for carrying the prescription arthritis drug Celebrex, which is banned in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Rocky Sharma and Stephen Macleod, who have been together for 10 years, were stopped upon arrival in Dubai on Aug 2, where they planned to spend the day before returning to Toronto from a vacation in India.

Macleod had a bottle of the prescription arthritis medication Celebrex in his suitcase. They were told Celebrex is a controlled substance in UAE and, even though they did not present themselves to border officials as a couple, both partners were detained.

“I think they thought we were gay and we would have some party drugs with us,” says Sharma, who is now safely back at home with his partner. “They were definitely targeting people who are young, from the western world and nicely dressed, like they are going to party.”

The UAE has very tough drug laws. Even over-the-counter medications that include traces of codeine are restricted. Possession can result in lengthy jail sentences, heavy fines or the death penalty, according to an advisory issued by the Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT).

[. . .]

They were not given an opportunity to contact a lawyer or consular officials but Sharma managed to contact friends at home on his Blackberry, which he had on him at the time of his arrest. Those friends gave him the emergency contact number of the Canadian embassy in Abu Dhabi, which Sharma called before his Blackberry was confiscated. Sharma’s family also contacted DFAIT in Canada but their efforts were stymied by the long weekend.

[. . .]

For the next 18 days, Sharma and Macleod could only communicate with each other via the case worker provided by the Canadian consulate.

“That was one of the worst parts, because I had no idea how he was doing, he had no idea how I was doing,” says Sharma. “We were told by the embassy not to even hint that we were a couple, to act like we were only friends, and that’s what we did.”

Homosexuality is punishable by death in UAE.

Even when the couple was formally declared innocent by the Dubai prosecution on Aug 18, they were kept another 11 days while their paperwork was processed.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
In my final post on Guido Westerwelle, the out leader of Germany's successful Free Democratic Party (1, 2), I'd like to note James Kirchick's suggestion in Newsweek that Westerwelle, if he becomes Foreign Minister as per German political tradition, could help normalize of homosexuality in any number of homophobic countries by his very presence.

Westerwelle is about to become the face that Germany presents overseas—which might be a problem for the nations where the denial of homosexuality and the imprisonment, torture, and murder of gay people are official state policies. That's why, after he takes the helm of the Foreign Ministry, Westerwelle ought to kick off his tenure with a tour of the world's most homophobic nations, speaking about the horrific ways in which these regimes treat their gay citizens. Unfortunately, he might be on the road for a while.

Westerwelle could begin his journey in Iran, which depends heavily on Germany as its No. 1 European trading partner. In his infamous address two years ago at Columbia University, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad denied the very existence of homosexuality in his country—an absurd claim. Three years ago, the case of two Iranian teenagers hanged for homosexuality drew worldwide condemnation.

After Iran, it'd be on to nearby Saudi Arabia, which, despite a burgeoning gay underworld, beheads gay people. Then he could fly down to Zimbabwe, where President Robert Mugabe refers to gays as "perverts" who are "lower than dogs and pigs." It was probably inevitable that a crude strongman like Hugo Chávez would turn to prejudices like anti-Semitism and homophobia in order to find scapegoats for his ruinous policies; who better than Westerwelle—as the foreign minister of a country that overcame its own murderous encounters with these two hatreds—to confront Chávez about targeting such vulnerable populations? How could these assorted dictators respond to the foreign minister from the fourth-biggest economy with anything other than bluster?

While it's unfortunately true that many homophobic regimes channel popular homophobic opinion in their countries, it's also true that individuals are more likely to support equal rights for homosexuals if they interact with them. For the vast majority of the people in nations Westerwelle visits, he will be just a distant figure, someone whose face they will see on the front page of newspapers and on television. But his being in the room during high-level talks with the likes of Ahmadinejad and Vladimir Putin may alter their attitudes about homosexuality, if only a little.


There is, of course, the question of whether or not someone's personal identity should be used to make someone do something. There's also the question of whether or not he will actually become Finance Minister, if only for the sake of a coherent foreign policy firmly under the control over the governing party.

[I]ncoherence in foreign policy mattered little before reunification, when Germany's low-key foreign policy mainly consisted of supporting European integration and the transatlantic alliance. But today, Germany claims international leadership and is expected to adopt regional and global responsibilities. Today, German foreign policy should not be a matter of coalition squabbles. Therefore, the foreign minister should come from Merkel's own party.

Westerwelle should move into the finance ministry instead. While the foreign policy part of the FDP's manifesto is weak, it has strong positions on economic policy: it advocates open markets, less stringent hiring and firing rules, an effective competition policy, help for small enterprises and, most importantly, lower and simpler taxes. Westerwelle insists that he will not sign a coalition agreement that does not contain tax reform. But he also knows that with €1.6 trillion in public debt and a new law mandating a zero deficit by 2016, there is not much room for fiscal manoeuvre.


Why am I excited by all this? It's just nice to have a high-profile political figure who's out, and Canada doesn't have such a figure apart from a certain someone who really isn't gay, no, really. Iceland's Prime Minister Jóhanna Sigurðardóttir, and Britain's Peter Mandelson. (Britons can tell me whether the last is a good role model; I've read a broad spectrum of opinions.) It's just, well, it makes me happy.
rfmcdonald: (Default)
You should consider yourself lucky that I was able to post these links today. If not, I would have had to post them tomorrow, and likely displaced that day's [FORUM] post entirely.


  • 3 Quarks Daily links to Robert Kaplan's article in the Atlantic Monthly praising al-Jazeera as an authentic and interesting expression of Third World opinion.

  • Acts of Minor Treason celebrates Germany's new interest in using nuclear energy.

  • James Bow bids farewell to Toronto's mayor David Miller, who has announced that he won't run in the next election in 14 months' time. Bow thinks that he did reasonably well, especially considering the innate conservatism of the city's bureaucracy.

  • Centauri Dreams explores new observations made of pre-planetary dust disks, soon to become planets, orbiting any number of stars. Of note is a dusk disk found in orbit of a massive and terrifically energetic B blue star. If these disks can form there, commenters suggest, surely they could form anywhere.

  • Far Outliers documents the series of annexations made by Western powers in Polynesia over the 1840-1906 period, and perhaps not coincidentally notes the popularity of sailors from the Pacific islands.

  • A Fistful of Euros' Alex Harrowell points out that the canceled American anti-missile program that would have made use of bases in the Czech Republic and Poland wasn't very useful anyway. Meanwhile, the inimitable Edward Hugh observes that the very low interest rates in demographically aging countries like Germany and Sweden has helped provider countries like the United States and Spain with far too much capital to be managed responsibly.

  • Noel Maurer finds the area of a disenchanted American military staging a coup against the elected government ludicrous, and rightly so.

  • Slap Upside the Head follows the lawsuit and counter-lawsuit involving a gay man forbidden from donating blood, and reports on the inability of American same-sex couples married in Canada to get divorces back home.

  • Over at Torontoist, we see a sensitive, productive discussion on bicycles and their role in Toronto in the somewhat critical post "Terence Corcoran Hates Your Bike".

Profile

rfmcdonald: (Default)rfmcdonald

February 2021

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
212223242526 27
28      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 10:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios